On Jul 2, 2012 1:23 AM, dave walton walton.d...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an OCZ SSD in my net book, now running Ubuntu. So far no complaints
once they fixed the firmware, after 6 months or so, but it is not a
computer we use a lot. Definitely the best upgrade for that computer as far
as battery
I have found ubuntu to be far and away the easiest to install on multiple
strange hardware. No idea why. Win7 is garbage unless you have piles of oem
cd with drivers. Same with vista.Bound to be open source support for SSD.
clay
1974 450sl - Frosch - Two tone green
1972 220D - Gump
On Jul 2, 2012 11:59 AM, clay monroe redgh...@comcast.net wrote:
Bound to be open source
support for SSD.
After reading a lot of reviews on Newegg, I'm leaning towards shelling out
the extra $50 for Intel over OCZ, not only because it sounds like you get
what you pay for in reliability, but
I have to say that Windows 7 has installed flawlessly whenever I've
tried it, which has only been a few times. It's the dozens of
update/reboot cycles post-install that are the pain.
Ubuntu is a commercially-sponsored distribution has as a primary goal
the creation of an easy-to-use Linux
almost too far.
If I am not able to get winblows to install, I have no issue with ubuntu on
that machine. These are failed hackintosh boxes from white box systems or
corporate toss away. AMD or intel, ubuntu does not care what the audio or
video card is, what sort of usb or firewire, wifi
Keep in mind that all SSD's have limited write cycles and will
eventually wear out. Writes progressively slow down as you reach it's
end of life.
A company I once worked for switched their BSD-based product to
SSD's for 'reliability'. The failures, infrequent before than,
then started pouring
I am deploying a 200TB IBM SAN (XIV) this week that uses around 3TBs of SSDs
for caching. Looking forward to putting this baby into service... we have a
bunch of ESX boxes that I want to expand, along with increasing the size of the
disk pool for our Tivoli storage library.
Dan
On Jul 1,
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Jim Cathey j...@windwireless.net wrote:
Flash, IIRC, degrades to something like 1/10 of initial write speed,
or even worse, over the rated life span.
How do I determine the rated life span?
Dave Walton wrote:
If speed is paramount, buy a larger drive, format
How do I determine the rated life span?
Ideally it's in the spec sheet.
-- Jim
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Jim Cathey j...@windwireless.net wrote:
How do I determine the rated life span?
Ideally it's in the spec sheet.
All it says is for the OCZ drive I linked to is MBTF 2 million hours.
I wondered how that compared to a modern (conventional) hard drive, so
I
Alex Chamberlain apchamberl...@gmail.com writes:
Dave Walton wrote:
If speed is paramount, buy a larger drive, format it to a lower capacity,
and run the manufacturer's utility to add the extra space into the wear
leveling cache. That will speed up writes.
Are these utilities something you
There is a protocol that aligns the block size used by the OS with the
block size used by the drive. This can minimize writes depending on
the application.
Not sure if the wear leveling realignment utilities are generally
released. You can probably find them somewhere. Increasing the number
of
12 matches
Mail list logo
