Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Quote without comment

On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 19:39:39 -0600 OK Don via Mercedes wrote: > IIRC, it was damaging the ozone layer, letting UV in that fries most > living things. Since it was banned, the hole in the ozone layer has > closed up. I know, correspondence does not equal causality, but > still . . . Indeed

Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Quote without comment

You're thinking too logically.  Can't do that with the Greenies.  Remember the good old days of $1 cans oof R12?  ;-) LarryT On 11/25/2018 7:10 PM, archer75--- via Mercedes wrote: Remember the '70s when R-12 was banned because it caused global cooling. Why couldn't we just bring back R-12?

Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Quote without comment

Wouldn't one imaginary problem cancel out another imaginary problem? Gerry On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 18:30:16 -0600 Curley McLain via Mercedes wrote: > The problem with R12 was that Duponts patents were expiring, so they > jumped in with the greenie weenies to ban R12, forcing us to buy $10/lb >

Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Quote without comment

IIRC, it was damaging the ozone layer, letting UV in that fries most living things. Since it was banned, the hole in the ozone layer has closed up. I know, correspondence does not equal causality, but still . . . On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:11 PM archer75--- via Mercedes < mercedes@okiebenz.com>

Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Quote without comment

The problem with R12 was that Duponts patents were expiring, so they jumped in with the greenie weenies to ban R12, forcing us to buy $10/lb and up new "refirgerants" in place of $0.50/lb R12. A much better situation for DuPont. Liberally spending other peoples money, stolen at gunpoint,

Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Quote without comment

Remember the '70s when R-12 was banned because it caused global cooling. Why couldn't we just bring back R-12? Global cooling cancelling out global warming? Gerry ... Curley McLain wrote: > Liberally spending other peoples money, stolen at

Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Quote without comment

Liberally spending other peoples money, stolen at gunpoint, to "Cure" a nonexistent "problem." Mitch Haley via Mercedes November 25, 2018 at 1:51 PM https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/11/23/scientists-suggest-dimming-the-sun-to-solve-global-warming/ Scientists

Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Quote without comment

Maybe they would be more likely to have success with fewer unintended consequences if the obsolete nukes were fed to a few remote volcanos. That would spew organical products into the air high enough and wide enough to increase albedo, as well as spread the goodness into the oceans and reduce

Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Quote without comment

How about we simply ignite the methane gas coming out of academia and such scientist? I'm sure the ensuing fire would envelope the earth is a smoke cloud that would block the sun for a couple hundred years. OR, we could just have more forest fires brought on by bad forest management and bad

Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Quote without comment

> On November 25, 2018 at 1:03 PM G Mann via Mercedes > wrote: > > I predict this "mad monkey" will destroy all the pie in the sky ideas about > what the future holds. https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/11/23/scientists-suggest-dimming-the-sun-to-solve-global-warming/ Scientists have

Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Quote without comment

The great prophet of all things about to happen has thus spoken ONE little disconnect from true logic, however, which is a fatal flaw in all he says... That is the hard wired genetic human need for self determination. Rather than letting some one of some thing make all decisions. I predict

[MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Quote without comment

A lot of vague assumptions written by a dreamer. Where are they going to get all that electricity and what will it cost?Sent from my Galaxy Tab® A Original message From: archer75--- via Mercedes Date: 2018-11-25 2:37 AM (GMT-06:00) To: Mercedes Discussion List Cc:

[MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Quote without comment

One obvious omission is the number of fatalities caused by these "wonderful" electric cars that silently attack pedestrians who can't hear them coming. The proponents will claim that their "smart" car will sense and avoid the pedestrian. Even "Failproof" systems fail. There will be a rise