Does the book give you L/D data, like "At 25,000lb and 40,000ft, your maximum
L/D of 17 will be reached at 220 knots"?
Mitch
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
exactly
On 11/5/2010 9:01 PM, Mitch Haley wrote:
Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:
If you were at max altitude and the engine quit, you should be
able to glide for quite a while
Unless you kept pulling back on the stick trying to hold
altitude while the stick shaker tried to tell you to drop the nose
Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:
If you were at max altitude and the engine quit, you should be able to
glide for quite a while
Unless you kept pulling back on the stick trying to hold altitude while the
stick shaker tried to tell you to drop the nose.
Mitch.
___
In their case, at least a good 41,000 feet.
Ed
300E
On 5 November 2010 19:46, Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:
> If you were at max altitude and the engine quit, you should be able to
> glide for quite a while
>
> On 11/5/2010 1:25 PM, Mitch Haley wrote:
>
>> Allan Streib wrote:
>>
>>> Not to mention t
If you were at max altitude and the engine quit, you should be
able to glide for quite a while
On 11/5/2010 1:25 PM, Mitch Haley wrote:
Allan Streib wrote:
Not to mention the implicit assumption that the pilots won't do
stupid
stuff that they don't know how to recover from. This story is
alm
Let's see... That question similar to "Do I want apple pie or ice cream for
dessert?"
Yes (to both)
--
John W Reames
jwrea...@comcast.net
Home: +14106646986
Mobile: +14437915905
On Nov 5, 2010, at 14:25, Mitch Haley wrote:
> Allan Streib wrote:
>> Not to mention the implicit assumption that t
Allan Streib wrote:
Not to mention the implicit assumption that the pilots won't do stupid
stuff that they don't know how to recover from. This story is almost an
illustration of darwinism at work.
Stupid stuff like operating at book maximum altitude?
Or stupid stuff like not trading altitude
>
> -Original Message- From: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com
> [mailto:mercedes-
> boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of relng...@aol.com Sent: Thursday,
> November 04, 2010 6:53 PM To: mercedes@okiebenz.com Subject: Re: [MBZ]
> CRJ land anywhere??
>
> > I h
Greg
-Original Message-
From: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com]
On Behalf Of relng...@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 6:53 PM
To: mercedes@okiebenz.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] CRJ land anywhere??
> I have flown many times in de Havill
> I have flown many times in de Havilland (now Bombardier) aircraft. I
> am
> confident that they can put down almost anywhere in the event of lost
> power...
>
You could not be more incorrect. Read this and scroll down to the bottom
for the cockpit voice recorder transcript.
http://www.i
10 matches
Mail list logo
