if by "plain Cherokee" you mean the classic boxy XJ that they haven't
made for about 7 years, they were available for a few years with an
awful (Renault?) diesel back in the 80s.
cheers!
e
Loren Faeth wrote:
> A plain cherokee had no diesel option as far as I know.
___
Come to the UK if you want crappy cars/vans with a dieselall the Grand
Voyagers in my neighbourhood are diesel. So are the Cheeps...and Land
Rovers/Range Rovers...well, not ALL the Range Roverssome poseurs still
drive the petrol crap.
You gotta love all the Aston Martins and Bentley Contin
Huh? The 2007 Cheep Grand Cherokee was the only one of the much
touted 2007 dodge lineup with MB Bluetec engines that actually
materialized. Only problem was that the Cheep was $50k. I told the
Stealer that for $50 k, I'd buy a real Mercedes.
The Cheep Liberty had an italian (no parts avail
Some of them had a turbocharged Detroit. Got horrible milage -- I'd
have thought 30 + with a 602 variant, they got 22 with the diesel.
The 4.0L gasser gets 18, I think.
Peter
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http:
Sticker on? these is about 38K.? I thought they were 3.2 L tho.
Jim in Phoenix
2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee 3.0 Diesel 2 left! New lower price! - $30230
(Scottsdale,AZ)
Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008-03-07, 6:16PM MST
We have 2 Diesels left and they need to go!!!
The 3.0 Crd is in Ward
I thought the "modern" (XJ/1984-2001) cherokees were lighter, I seem to
recall that they were 3000-3100lbs, where the "Full Size" jeeps (earlier
cherokees/wagoneers, and grand cherokee/wagoneer through 1993 (SJ body
style)) were in the 4500lb neighborhood...
Those I-6's are pretty respectable
David B. wrote:
"I had a roommate in college that had one,
although his only had one tank. The gas gauge was broken, so we filled
up every 100 miles, which made it depressingly easy to figure the fuel
economy. If I remember right we got 10 mpg solo, 6 mpg pulling a
snowmobile trailer
Kevin wrote:
Second, a v8 quadratrac four door full size jeep from the seventies with
the ultra-rare two-tank option weighs 4600 lbs on the scales. I have one.
[And yes, it really needs the second tank. Boy is that thing thirsty.]
Thanks for the correction. I had a roommate in college that
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:22:05AM -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:
> Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:
> > Wonder why they were so slow, even with turbos.
>
> Jeeps are HEAVY. I don't know what a Cherokee weighed, but the 70s
> Wagoneers were nearly three tons IIRC.
For starters, that cherokee was a comple
we can't compare XJ Cherokees to the Full Size J**ps; XJs (like those of
the diesel vintage) didn't weigh anywhere near that much.
since they're frame-less unitized construction, even with the wife and
myself in ours, our modified mid-90s 4x4 XJ with a 4.0L and automatic
trans weighs in under un
Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:
Wonder why they were so slow, even with turbos.
Jeeps are HEAVY. I don't know what a Cherokee weighed, but the 70s
Wagoneers were nearly three tons IIRC.
Same reasons the Nissans in Scouts were slow. Nobody builds automotive
diesels like MB and VW. High RPM, Inj timing advance, high P/W ratio, high
performance inj pumps.
Related to why MB 4 and 6 cyl gassers outperform detroit iron on P/W or
HP/Cu In
At 08:41 AM 6/6/2006, you wrote:
Won
Wonder why they were so slow, even with turbos.
Kevin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 01:45:53AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
<<86 diesel jeep cherokee?? didnt know they made them.>.
For the European market. I saw a few in Italy about that time. Slow and
smoky. Perhaps VM engines.
Rena
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 01:45:53AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> <<86 diesel jeep cherokee?? didnt know they made them.>.
>
> For the European market. I saw a few in Italy about that time. Slow and
> smoky. Perhaps VM engines.
Renault. Available stateside two years (86, 87?). 2.1L TD. Even w
<<86 diesel jeep cherokee? didnt know they made them.>.
For the European market. I saw a few in Italy about that time. Slow and
smoky. Perhaps VM engines.
RLE
15 matches
Mail list logo
