Re: [MBZ] MBZ engine in a J**p (was: Re: 300d hydraulic lifters)

2009-02-10 Thread ernest breakfield
then anyone wants to know but there you go. Manfred Manfred Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 21:53:17 -0800 From: ernest breakfield erne...@backyardengineering.org Subject: [MBZ] MBZ engine in a J**p (was: Re: 300d hydraulic lifters) when you say J**p, most people would ASSuME it's a 4WD; i didn't

Re: [MBZ] MBZ engine in a J**p (was: Re: 300d hydraulic, lifters)

2009-02-10 Thread MG
-0800 From: ernest breakfield erne...@backyardengineering.org Subject: Re: [MBZ] MBZ engine in a J**p (was: Re: 300d hydraulic lifters) hi Manfred! if the fact that this J**p was a 2WD was mentioned previously, i must have missed it; i don't read every post with Subject lines that aren't

Re: [MBZ] MBZ engine in a J**p (was: Re: 300d hydraulic lifters)

2009-02-09 Thread MG
erne...@backyardengineering.org Subject: [MBZ] MBZ engine in a J**p (was: Re: 300d hydraulic lifters) when you say J**p, most people would ASSuME it's a 4WD; i didn't see anything in your post to make it clear you were talking about one of the rare 'neutered' models. ;-) (after almost 250K

[MBZ] MBZ engine in a J**p (was: Re: 300d hydraulic lifters)

2009-02-08 Thread ernest breakfield
when you say J**p, most people would ASSuME it's a 4WD; i didn't see anything in your post to make it clear you were talking about one of the rare 'neutered' models. ;-) (after almost 250K miles on ours, i have no idea why anyone who didn't need 4WD would buy a J**p..?) cheers! e