In a message dated 9/2/2005 11:54:22 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i am not saying their should be no government, just that the governments duties should more limited I think protecting the citizenry from civil unrest is a legitimate undertaking for the government. At 11:26 PM 9/1/2005, you wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > it has to do as well with the government having given up on the > > concept that they are even vaguely responsible for the protection of > > its citizens. I'm no longer sure they still even acknowledge any > > responsibilities XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MY QUESTION IS WHY!!! why did not the president issue an order to nationalize the damn cops !!!! and why was /is there NO PLAN TO DO SO?????? 200 cops from each city on the east coast phila, Boston, Pittsburgh ,Atlanta, Washington, ect NY can spare 400 put us under federal rules 10 directives only restore ,maintain and keep order .....never mind arresting ppl and taking reports clear the damn corners!!!!! and stop looters!!!!! the mere presence of a uniform cop stops a lot of crap put us on trains and take us down south! send us in with a duffel bag cont jeans boots duty rig 2 bars of fels naphtha soap 1 bottle of brandy ect only the necessary stuff send us in with the food/ water trucks to the areas that need it to keep order and forchrissakes send the right cops ( real ones not crooks, punks or bullies) it is sooooo damn frustrating to sit here in phila ..doing nothing mike collins phila pa 1985 500 sec
