On 2022-01-07 22:26, G Mann via Mercedes wrote:
Just by the pictures it looks to have major A pillar damage. To
reconstruct
to that level would be a very serious lesson in body reconstruction and
in
my opinion, the reason it is where it is, for sale.
Does it likely have good salvage parts left
I think I would rather have a E250 anyway. Not much use for a small GLK.
On 1/7/2022 9:26 PM, G Mann via Mercedes wrote:
Just by the pictures it looks to have major A pillar damage. To reconstruct
to that level would be a very serious lesson in body reconstruction and in
my opinion, the reason
Just by the pictures it looks to have major A pillar damage. To reconstruct
to that level would be a very serious lesson in body reconstruction and in
my opinion, the reason it is where it is, for sale.
Does it likely have good salvage parts left ? Yes, if you need them, value
is there. If you
Worth fixing. My well maintained 2014 GLK 250 with 143k miles drives like
a new car.
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022, 6:32 PM Kaleb Striplin via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> That’s a little too fubar for me
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jan 7, 2022, at 4:46 PM, mitch--- via Mercedes
>
That’s a little too fubar for me
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 7, 2022, at 4:46 PM, mitch--- via Mercedes
> wrote:
>
> Needs door, fender, and possibly some unibody straightening, but you don't
> see many 4 cylinder diesels, especially at 5k miles per year.
> If had a better record of
Needs door, fender, and possibly some unibody straightening, but you
don't see many 4 cylinder diesels, especially at 5k miles per year.
If had a better record of completing projects, I'd buy it and wait until
I find a suitable body donor.
Who's near Chicago, besides Rick and the Ghost of
