This thread is like jock itch ... it just won't go away.
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:27:13 -0700 David Brodbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig McCluskey wrote:
> > George Bush did not cause the Governor of Louisiana to
> > refuse to give permission to the Feds to help.
>
> This has been repeated enough that people assume it's true, but AFAIK it
> isn't.
Bill Gallagher wrote:
> Happy to see the list feels principals of democracy are more
> important than a threat .
Screw democracy, I want liberty. That means no violations of
the Constitution, even if the popular majority likes being
violated.
Thank you for your reply... I ask this question before Katrina to others
and after and the difference is great
Historically, Americans accept the idea to delete democratic
principal in time of national crisis like war. WW1 and ww2 both show a
disregard to civil liberties ...during both th
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:10:52 -0400 andrew strasfogel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I remove the radio can I access the fibreoptic bulb/array?
>
> >
> > > Diesel content: I love my 1983 300TD though I wish I could diagnose
> > > my fiberoptic lights failure (all four rocker switches above the ac
Why don't you guys take this to one of the many political blogs on the
web. They live to tell lies about politicans of the opposite political
persuasion while hoping it will build up their side. Absolutely no one's
mind is going to be changed by repeating the talking points of the day on
this l
Plus why would we give that authority to any politician, whatever party? Dumb
question.
Craig McCluskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 01:46:44 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> if I thought I could trust him
>> he lied and ppl died ... weapons of mass destruction.
>>
Craig McCluskey wrote:
> George Bush did not cause the Governor of Louisiana to
> refuse to give permission to the Feds to help.
This has been repeated enough that people assume it's true, but AFAIK it
isn't. If you can provide me a source that says otherwise, I'd
appreciate seeing it.
There's a
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:31:51 -0400 andrew strasfogel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Mike, you're not alone, though I agree the debate gets too inflamed
> and besides, the red staters outnumber blues about 10,000 to 1 so it's
> probably wiser to cool it... ;)
I already replied to Mike. Stop prop
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 01:46:44 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> if I thought I could trust him
> he lied and ppl died ... weapons of mass destruction.
>
> halliburton
> 9-11
> THE big storm
> ect ect
> i dont think so
Enough of these falsehoods!!! I'm sick and tired of them being pa
Hey Mike, you're not alone, though I agree the debate gets too inflamed and
besides, the red staters outnumber blues about 10,000 to 1 so it's probably
wiser to cool it... ;)
Diesel content: I love my 1983 300TD though I wish I could diagnose my
fiberoptic lights failure (all four rocker switches
if I thought I could trust him
he lied and ppl died ... weapons of mass destruction.
halliburton
9-11
THE big storm
ect ect
i dont think so
mike collins
1985 500 sec
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 01:31:49AM -0400, Bill Gallagher wrote:
> Please vote JUST Yes or No on your opinion above...
I think this one crossed the line from mildly OT to dropping political
grenades with the hopes of starting a political rally on here YET AGAIN.
K
Hans Neureiter wrote:
> Here we go. So, even if */HE/* cancelles elections, that doesn't mean shit.
> There are limitations on what a President can do, thanks to our
> Constitution.
> But if he would persuade Congress and Senate, Oh Boy!
"Newsweek reported that Soaries expressed concern that no fe
Here we go. So, even if *HE* cancelles elections, that doesn't mean shit.
There are limitations on what a President can do, thanks to our
Constitution.
But if he would persuade Congress and Senate, Oh Boy!
On 9/18/05, Bill Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For if situation, President G.
NO
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Harry M.))
> Date: 2005/09/18 Sun PM 01:21:13 EDT
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mercedes mailing list)
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: Request Opinion on Political Issue
>
> thats a not
>
> Bill Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 01:31:49 -0400 Bill Gallagher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For if situation, President G.W.Bush said three week before the next
> Presidential national on TV, that Intelligence reports from the CIA and
> Homeland Security indicate a attack on the USA to disrupt the election
NO!
On 9/18/05, David Brodbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK Don wrote:
> > No!!!
>
> I feel the same way. I think it's a highly unlikely scenario, though,
> because I think *most* people would feel that way and the political
> backlash would be monumental. The Bush administration isn't in *th
LT Don wrote:
>
> Like ... I'd all of a sudden start trusting him?
>
> I think what you just described is referred to in the political science arena
> as a
> dictatorship.
That sawed-off Austrian corporal with the silly moustache got himself elected in
Germany, and it was the last election they
OK Don wrote:
> No!!!
I feel the same way. I think it's a highly unlikely scenario, though,
because I think *most* people would feel that way and the political
backlash would be monumental. The Bush administration isn't in *that*
much of a bubble.
No!!!
--
OK Don, KD5NRO
Norman, OK
'87 300SDL, '81 240D, '78 450SLC
The FSM created the Diesel Benz
http://www.venganza.org/
NO!
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Gallagher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mercedes Mail List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 1:31 AM
Subject: [MBZ] OT: Request Opinion on Political Issue
For if situation, President G.W.Bush
thats a not
Bill Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>For if situation, President G.W.Bush said three week before the next
>Presidential national on TV, that Intelligence reports from the CIA and
>Homeland Security indicate a attack on the USA to disrupt the election
>like in Spain three year
bject: [MBZ] OT: Request Opinion on Political Issue
For if situation, President G.W.Bush said three week before the next
Presidential national on TV, that Intelligence reports from the CIA and
Homeland Security indicate a attack on the USA to disrupt the election
like in Spain three years ago..
Like ... I'd all of a sudden start trusting him?
I think what you just described is referred to in the political science
arena as a dictatorship.
On 9/18/05, Bill Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For if situation, President G.W.Bush said three week before the next
> Presidential natio
Bill Gallagher wrote:
For if situation, President G.W.Bush said three week before the next
Presidential national on TV, that Intelligence reports from the CIA and
Homeland Security indicate a attack on the USA to disrupt the election
like in Spain three years ago. And to save American lives
no
Bill Gallagher wrote:
For if situation, President G.W.Bush said three week before the next
Presidential national on TV, that Intelligence reports from the CIA and
Homeland Security indicate a attack on the USA to disrupt the election
like in Spain three years ago. And to save American
For if situation, President G.W.Bush said three week before the next
Presidential national on TV, that Intelligence reports from the CIA and
Homeland Security indicate a attack on the USA to disrupt the election
like in Spain three years ago. And to save American lives, national
election fo
28 matches
Mail list logo
