Donnie Darko might think otherwise
--R
On 2/7/2011 1:49 PM, WILTON wrote:
Oh, I read it, but that's OK. ;<)
BTW, local Goldsboro paper is even worse, or maybe it's because I have
more personal knowledge of some of the stuff local rag prints - 'just
can't seem to get stuff right. It see
I think that was the first thing my son learned in ME school ---
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Craig wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 21:47:27 -0600 OK Don wrote:
>
> > Mechanical engineers build weapons, civil engineers build targets.
>
> Now that you mention it, I do remember that one.
>
>
> Cra
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 21:47:27 -0600 OK Don wrote:
> Mechanical engineers build weapons, civil engineers build targets.
Now that you mention it, I do remember that one.
Craig
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search l
That's great! Congratulations. I wish him well.
Wilton
- Original Message -
From: "OK Don"
To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: Wilton taking over NCDOT, was Re: OT Rant (was "F-16
Dead-St
Guided weapons?
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Walt Zarnoch wrote:
> So where do the ME/EE crosses like myself fit in? :)
>
> Walt
>
--
OK Don
2001 ML320
1992 300D 2.5T
1990 300D 2.5T
1997 Plymouth Grand Voyager
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used
He has passed the exam, now needs someone to give him real work experience
for the practical portion of the certification.
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 10:54 PM, WILTON wrote:
> Most states (well, NC, anyway) would then require that your son pass the
> appropriate Professional Engineering (PE) exam(s)
detonation.
They always emphasize how close they came to Armageddon - in reality, not
close at all - weapons were in SAFE configuration.
Wilton
- Original Message -
From: "Tim C"
To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 12:22 PM
Subject: Re
That's how I've seen it presented, bearing in mind that it was fed to the
N&O by the HOA.
However, the things I see from NCDOT say Lacy fielded the HOA's complaint,
suggested the HOA hire a consultant, the HOA comes back with a
professional-looking report that uses the lingo, and not only does the
So where do the ME/EE crosses like myself fit in? :)
Walt
On Feb 7, 2011 7:10 AM, "John Reames" wrote:
> ME's build weapons; CE's build targets...
> Then there is the one about the various disciplines discussing what
discipline God is (but that belongs on banned)...
>
> --
> John W Reames
> jwrea
ME's build weapons; CE's build targets...
Then there is the one about the various disciplines discussing what discipline
God is (but that belongs on banned)...
--
John W Reames
jwrea...@comcast.net
Home: +14106646986
Mobile: +14437915905
On Feb 6, 2011, at 22:19, Craig wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Feb 2
quot;
To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2011 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: Wilton taking over NCDOT, was Re: OT Rant (was "F-16
Dead-Stick Landing...NOW training/education")
In the fairness of full disclosure, I should state that (knocking on
woo
ruary 06, 2011 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: Wilton taking over NCDOT, was Re: OT Rant (was "F-16
Dead-Stick Landing...NOW training/education")
Mechanical engineers build weapons, civil engineers build targets.
I think that as long as the "non-engineer" wasn't pai
In the fairness of full disclosure, I should state that (knocking on wood),
my son will graduate as a mechanical engineer this spring ---
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:47 PM, OK Don wrote:
> Mechanical engineers build weapons, civil engineers build targets.
>
> I think that as long as the "non-engine
Mechanical engineers build weapons, civil engineers build targets.
I think that as long as the "non-engineer" wasn't paid for the work, it's
fine. Although I don't have a EE degree, doesn't make it unlawfull for me to
build and operate a radio receiver. I do have an amateur license to operate
a tr
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 21:11:55 -0500 John Reames
wrote:
> I read it as in the...gentleman...was questioning whether it was fraud
> for a non-engineer to apply engineering principles and use engineering
> data in a report that was submitted to the NCDoT; that NCDoT (and the
> citizens of the state (c
I read it as in the...gentleman...was questioning whether it was fraud for a
non-engineer to apply engineering principles and use engineering data in a
report that was submitted to the NCDoT; that NCDoT (and the citizens of the
state (country if FHWA funds are involved)) were the damaged parties
Your interpretation could be correct, but I read it as the DOT didn't like its
own conclusions being challenged and they have found a technicality that lets
them disregard the appeal, as well as slap the hand of the person who submitted
it.
Allan
On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 09:16 -0500, "Tim C" wrote
But Bev would be heart broken!
To play devil's advocate for Lacy, the N&O said it was the first time he has
done a referral to BELS. It wasn't clear from the article, but if the
history was unclear (submitted by the HOA does not necessarily imply money
was not exchanged) when he got the document,
18 matches
Mail list logo
