Re: [MBZ] OT: garage lighting

2008-02-26 Thread LarryT
://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs . - Original Message - From: Fmiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 1:18 AM Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT: garage lighting It seems than at Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:21:02 -0500, Mitch wrote: I think I found

Re: [MBZ] OT: garage lighting

2008-02-25 Thread Mitch Haley
LarryT wrote: Since we're talking about lights - I'll be buying some fixtures I'll likely be stuck with for 15-20 years so I want to buy something I;ll be happy with. I'm building a 20x36 garage with 3 roll up doors and was considering 8 4' sections of incandescent tubes on each side of the

Re: [MBZ] OT: garage lighting

2008-02-25 Thread Jeff Zedic
Let's see nowthat works out to four dollars per year per unit ...does that sound expensive? You get what you pay for. Zedic ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL

Re: [MBZ] OT: garage lighting

2008-02-25 Thread John Robbins
Mitch Haley wrote: A friend of mine took down the generic 30 year old 4' lamps in his garage and put in some high output 8' lamps that were supposed to work well in cold weather. I forget the wattage, he put five two bulb lights up on three circuits. When you turn them all on, it's daylight in

Re: [MBZ] OT: garage lighting

2008-02-25 Thread PM7088
I'm jealous. I've long ago quit (gave-up) trying to light my garage. Low ceiling and sub zero temps are my problem. Hay Honey, Look, a nice 2 bedroom Fixer Upper with and 8 car barn. Maybe we should bye it. Keep Driving, she said Pete -- Original message

Re: [MBZ] OT: garage lighting

2008-02-25 Thread Mitch Haley
In my very limited experience the electronic ballasts seem to be worth the extra cost. Quick quiet startup + lower energy usage. Sounds good to me! Very good point. Much of the improvment may have been fron replacing 1960s ballasts with 1990s electronics, rather than from replacing 24

Re: [MBZ] OT: garage lighting

2008-02-25 Thread Mitch Haley
I think I found the lights my friend uses. No wonder it's like a sunny day at the beach, he's got over a kilowatt of fluorescent in a two car garage. Just the center fixture alone is 220W. 96 T12 high output, 110W per bulb, electronic ballast, starts at -20F, $104 for a two light fixture at

Re: [MBZ] OT: garage lighting

2008-02-25 Thread Mitch Haley
John M McIntosh wrote: T12 tsk, should consider T8 1 x 8' bulbs scare me. 1x48 would be OK, but I'm already afraid of breakage when I have to handle a 96 T12. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/

Re: [MBZ] OT: garage lighting

2008-02-25 Thread John M McIntosh
T12 tsk, should consider T8 Which is what your government demands... http://www.va.gov/facmgt/consulting/t8lamps.asp On Feb 25, 2008, at 12:21 PM, Mitch Haley wrote: I think I found the lights my friend uses. No wonder it's like a sunny day at the beach, he's got over a kilowatt of

Re: [MBZ] OT: garage lighting

2008-02-25 Thread Allan Streib
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm jealous. I've long ago quit (gave-up) trying to light my garage. Low ceiling and sub zero temps are my problem. Regular incandescents work fine in the cold -- I have 6 100 W bare bulbs in my garage ceiling, and it's plenty bright, though I could use 150 or even

Re: [MBZ] OT: garage lighting

2008-02-25 Thread Fmiser
It seems than at Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:21:02 -0500, Mitch wrote: I think I found the lights my friend uses. No wonder it's like a sunny day at the beach, he's got over a kilowatt of fluorescent in a two car garage. Just the center fixture alone is 220W. WOW! That's a lot of light! It's