Alex wrote: Edmunds.com says the last year for the Reatta was 1991. Snook,
are you talking about the Riviera made at the same time as the Reatta, or the
next generation after that, sold 1995-1999? I've always thought the latter was
a drop-dead gorgeous car---sometimes GM's styling department
I never understood these cars. Weren't they kind of expensive when they
were out? I used to see a few of them around, never really knew what
their specs were. Are they desirable in some way? Sporty, high
performance? Were they some kind of re-badged furrin model?
There were allegations of a handbuilt element to the car. Nothing really
special in any way, but nice enough cars
--Original Message--
From: Rich Thomas
Sender: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com
To: Mercedes Discussion List
ReplyTo: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: [MBZ] OT Buick Reatta
Windsor, CT 06095
- Original Message -
From: jabbahur...@gmail.com
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 9:36:14 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT Buick Reatta
There were allegations of a handbuilt element to the car
pm7...@comcast.net wrote:
A neighbor had one, claimed very good service, decent mileage.
Just your typical, durable Buick with a 3800 engine, except this one has no
interior space and looks kind of cool. 15 years ago they'd have a resale value
about double that of a same year Regal.
Mitch.
Rich wrote: I never understood these cars. Weren't they kind of expensive
when they
were out? I used to see a few of them around, never really knew what
their specs were. Are they desirable in some way? Sporty, high
performance? Were they some kind of re-badged furrin model?
The Reatta was
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Donald Snook dsn...@mtsqh.com wrote:
The Riveria was probably a better car because it had the same powertrain,
without many of
the prone-to-break electronics that the Reatta was saddled with.
Edmunds.com says the last year for the Reatta was 1991. Snook,
