Re: [MBZ] Opinions (was: WAY too much for this car)

2005-11-22 Thread Dave M.
Hi Donald, I understand where you're coming from, and usually I'd agree that is was a little on the high side. And, I don't trust photos that much either. However, if you read the entire text of the ad, almost every high-dollar failure has been addressed. That includes the A/C system, tranny, and

Re: [MBZ] Opinions (was: WAY too much for this car)

2005-11-22 Thread Gabriel S.
it is way overprice...read the blue book value...shit, you can even double that and it STILL isn't what it sold for.

Re: [MBZ] Opinions (was: WAY too much for this car)

2005-11-22 Thread Marshall Booth
Gabriel S. wrote: it is way overprice...read the blue book value...shit, you can even double that and it STILL isn't what it sold for. What it sold for was what it was worth!! Anyone that sold it for less would be a FOOL! Marshall -- Marshall Booth (who doesn't respond to unsigned

Re: [MBZ] Opinions (was: WAY too much for this car)

2005-11-22 Thread John Peterson
selling MB diesels. We won't quite our day jobs, however! John Peterson Kingston RI 1991 300D 2.5 74k - Original Message - From: Marshall Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mercedes mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 7:46 PM Subject: Re: [MBZ] Opinions (was: WAY

Re: [MBZ] Opinions (was: WAY too much for this car)

2005-11-22 Thread Gabriel S.
What it sold for was what it was worth!! Anyone that sold it for less would be a FOOL! Like I said earlier...I think wagon owners tend to 'puff' the value of their cars. You wagon drivers are like users of Macintosh computers! PS all in humor and not trying to start a flame.