Re: [MBZ] Pre-rodbender?

2006-12-28 Thread John W. Reames III
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Bob Rentfro wrote: > This is pre-rodbender, correct? > > http://tinyurl.com/yy9n9p 3.0L should be okay. it was the 3.5 (.97x) engine that liked to run with the pistons cock-eyed -j. BTW my brother has a 1987 SDL in need of work (engine seems okay, except the tensioner, and

Re: [MBZ] Pre-rodbender?

2006-12-27 Thread Bob Rentfro
Yes it is...wadaya think it will go for? Bob R. - Original Message - From: "Sunil Hari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mercedes Discussion List" Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 9:27 AM Subject: Re: [MBZ] Pre-rodbender? yep - that's the 3.0L turbodiesel,

Re: [MBZ] Pre-rodbender?

2006-12-27 Thread dave walton
Yes. That looks like a nice one. Very nice. My 87 has 330,000+ miles. Easy to work on. Lots of room under the hood for a WVO conversion. -Dave Walton 82 240D, 87SDL, 94S350, 99E30 On 12/27/06, Bob Rentfro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is pre-rodbender, correct? http://tinyurl.com/yy9n9p Bo

Re: [MBZ] Pre-rodbender?

2006-12-27 Thread Sunil Hari
yep - that's the 3.0L turbodiesel, IIRC. Nearly bulletproof, and actually the exact car i've been looking for. However, it's in Cali. On 12/27/06, Bob Rentfro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is pre-rodbender, correct? http://tinyurl.com/yy9n9p Bob R ___

[MBZ] Pre-rodbender?

2006-12-27 Thread Bob Rentfro
This is pre-rodbender, correct? http://tinyurl.com/yy9n9p Bob R