Re: [MBZ] Transmission Question

Subject: Re: [MBZ] Transmission Question Yep. My experience as well in a 123diesel On Jan 22, 2016 11:27 AM, "Kaleb C. Striplin via Mercedes" < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > No it means the transmission is shot and needs to be rebuilt > > Sent from my iPhone > >

Re: [MBZ] Transmission Question

The adjustment bolt is only on older transmissions Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 22, 2016, at 12:33 PM, Mitch Haley via Mercedes > wrote: > > > >> On January 22, 2016 at 12:02 PM Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes >> wrote: >> >> >> Yep. My

Re: [MBZ] Transmission Question

Bushings are a few bucks and fairly quick and non-invasive. Car probably would not suffer having fresh ones. Then you can mess with the internals if that fix was not right clay On Jan 22, 2016, at 8:25 AM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes wrote: > I think it's a matter of putting the transmission

Re: [MBZ] Transmission Question

e- > From: Mercedes [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of > clay via Mercedes > Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 5:31 PM > To: Mercedes Discussion List <mercedes@okiebenz.com> > Cc: clay <redgh...@comcast.net> > Subject: Re: [MBZ] Transmission Questi

Re: [MBZ] Transmission Question

I don't know about that but have you checked the bushings? They went bad on one of the SDs and it was almost impossible to get it in gear forward or reverse. --R On 1/22/16 11:08 AM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes wrote: Does lack of reverse engagement in a W126 mean a failed B2 piston? I

Re: [MBZ] Transmission Question

Yep. My experience as well in a 123diesel On Jan 22, 2016 11:27 AM, "Kaleb C. Striplin via Mercedes" < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > No it means the transmission is shot and needs to be rebuilt > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jan 22, 2016, at 10:08 AM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes < >

Re: [MBZ] Transmission Question

I think it's a matter of putting the transmission selector in "R" but the car not backing up. Good thing to check, though. Thanks! Dan Sent from my iPad > On Jan 22, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Rich Thomas via Mercedes > wrote: > > I don't know about that but have you checked

Re: [MBZ] Transmission Question

No it means the transmission is shot and needs to be rebuilt Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 22, 2016, at 10:08 AM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes > wrote: > > Does lack of reverse engagement in a W126 mean a failed B2 piston? I > couldn't recall if that was the symptom. > >

[MBZ] Transmission Question

Does lack of reverse engagement in a W126 mean a failed B2 piston? I couldn't recall if that was the symptom. Thanks, Dan Sent from my iPad ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change

Re: [MBZ] transmission question, 1981 300SD

To: mercedes@okiebenz.com Subject: [MBZ] transmission question, 1981 300SD While back, I bought a 300SD at an auction. The car needs a minimum maintenance. When I first took it to the tire/alignment shop, the owner of the shop mentioned to me that the transmission was slipping in 1st gear. hummn! I am

[MBZ] transmission question, 1981 300SD

While back, I bought a 300SD at an auction. The car needs a minimum maintenance. When I first took it to the tire/alignment shop, the owner of the shop mentioned to me that the transmission was slipping in 1st gear. hummn! I am trying to make sense of this before I get into it. The

Re: [MBZ] transmission question, 1981 300SD

P. Prud'homme wrote: While back, I bought a 300SD at an auction. The car needs a minimum maintenance. When I first took it to the tire/alignment shop, the owner of the shop mentioned to me that the transmission was slipping in 1st gear. hummn! But you don't notice it? And this was a tire

Re: [MBZ] transmission question, 1981 300SD

P. Prud'homme pa...@yahoo.com writes: While back, I bought a 300SD at an auction. The car needs a minimum maintenance. When I first took it to the tire/alignment shop, the owner of the shop mentioned to me that the transmission was slipping in 1st gear. hummn! I am trying to make sense of

[MBZ] Transmission question

The tranny slippage on my 240D (automatic) in reverse seems to be getting worse and worse. I still can't find that adjustment bolt that sometimes backs out -- maybe Kaleb can point it out next time he is in Iowa. But I checked the fluid level, thinking maybe it was low, when we got back from a

Re: [MBZ] Transmission question

I thought the issue with an over-full tranny was that the fuid gets whipped up into a froth - then can't lubricate parts, resulting in a tranny that grinds its self to bits. Maybe it starts with reverse? Would having too much fluid in the system have anything to do with slipping going

Re: [MBZ] Transmission Question

So this would lead me to wonder if I could also get almost any transmission from a w126 to work in my 82 300SD as well? I'm sure that the auto in a w123 300D will. Of course what I would like is to replace the atomatic with a 5 speed manual. Are there any that would work, that I could find,

[MBZ] Transmission Question

Hello: Well a transmission from a 89 420SEL be a bolt in replacement for a trans in a 88 560SEL. RC _ Play Flexicon: the crossword game that feeds your brain. PLAY now for FREE. 

Re: [MBZ] Transmission Question

Will a transmission from a 89 420SEL be a bolt in replacement for a trans in a 88 560SEL. My GUESS would be yes. But there's probably somebody here who actually knows. -- Jim

Re: [MBZ] Transmission Question

Yes, the vacuum modulator may be different. Trampas -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Conlon Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 10:44 AM To: mercedes@okiebenz.com Subject: [MBZ] Transmission Question Hello: Well a transmission from

Re: [MBZ] Transmission Question

Yes, it will. There are very slight differences in the valve body, but it will work just fine. Roger Conlon wrote: Hello: Well a transmission from a 89 420SEL be a bolt in replacement for a trans in a 88 560SEL. RC _ Play