Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-28 Thread andrew strasfogel
I actually found and drove home a good running 83 300TD with a bad body and cracked dash yesterday! The drive train will be transplanted into the donee car. The donor car has a better than average palomino interior - anybody interested? The transmission seems OK except for perhaps one thing.

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-27 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
$200 andrew strasfogel wrote: Anybody care to guess what an engine-less 1983 300TD with a nice blue interior and rusty but restorable body is worth? No warranty on the used transmission either! On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I dont really

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-27 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
The head is unique to the wagon, have to use a wagon engine or swap the wagon head on. Mitch Haley wrote: andrew strasfogel wrote: Kaleb, I may have found a used '84 project car with a good engine. Will that engine fit in my 83 without any modifications? If it's coming out of a coupe or

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-25 Thread Mitch Haley
andrew strasfogel wrote: Anybody care to guess what an engine-less 1983 300TD with a nice blue interior and rusty but restorable body is worth? No warranty on the used transmission either! Swap the toasted engine from the rust free car into it. Sell it like you bought the rust free car, a

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-25 Thread andrew strasfogel
Interesting advice. I was actually thinking of transferring the drive train (engine + transmission) into the rust-free car, but not reinstalling either into my rusty wagon. How would this affect the value of the car I would be trying to sell? On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Mitch Haley [EMAIL

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-25 Thread Mitch Haley
andrew strasfogel wrote: How would this affect the value of the car I would be trying to sell? I was thinking a rolling chassis/interior would go for parts or salvage, maybe $0.10-0.15 a pound, but maybe a complete but non-running car could be sold as a project car for a little more. OTOH,

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-25 Thread andrew strasfogel
Reading between the lines, are you saying it would be a project if it were a rolling chassis with an engine and transmission lying in the back of the car, but a restorable non-running car if IF the bad engine and questionable tranny were in situ and not removed? On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 7:59 PM,

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-24 Thread andrew strasfogel
Anybody care to guess what an engine-less 1983 300TD with a nice blue interior and rusty but restorable body is worth? No warranty on the used transmission either! On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I dont really see any cracks on that head of yours.

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-23 Thread Loren Faeth
The last I knew, a factory short block did not require a core. The head is likely to be ok. Valves are likely ok also At 09:10 PM 5/22/2008, you wrote: I almost forgot. The body donor is the car that was run out of oil until it wouldn't run, right? The only thing worth saving on that engine

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-23 Thread Mitch Haley
Loren Faeth wrote: The last I knew, a factory short block did not require a core. The head is likely to be ok. Valves are likely ok also Good point. Valves/guides can probably survive a few minutes w/o fresh oil. But the cam and followers were probably the first things to go, and I can't

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-23 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
I dont really see any cracks on that head of yours. I have a place that can actually rebuild the 14;s anyway and they seem to hold up. Luther wrote: That is a posibility, since Kaleb traded me his solid 617 block for my cracked 603 head. Luther On Thu, 22 May 2008 08:51:30 -0500, Loren

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-22 Thread LWB250
There is nothing reputable about Adsit, IMHO. Steer very clear of them. Dan --- andrew strasfogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As feared, my new rust free 1983 wagon does indeed have a bad engine. :((I was thinking of taking the drive train from my decent running 1983 rusty 300TD, but

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-22 Thread Mitch Haley
How rusty is the good running wagon? Is it just looking not so perfect, or does it have holes in the rockers/wheel wells/floors? Wouldn't you rather have the drivetrain you've come to know and trust? I think giving the rust free car a heart transplant from your known car is better than selling

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-22 Thread andrew strasfogel
What about other sources for a rebuilt? On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:36 AM, Mitch Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How rusty is the good running wagon? Is it just looking not so perfect, or does it have holes in the rockers/wheel wells/floors? Wouldn't you rather have the drivetrain you've come

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-22 Thread Rolf
I will buy the old head from you. If you want a good engine and don't care about $ as much go with Metric Motors. 85 is the same as the others, the SLS head is what makes it special. With a shortblock you will be reusing the old head. -Rolf andrew strasfogel wrote: As feared, my new rust free

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-22 Thread Mitch Haley
Rolf wrote: 85 is the same as the others, the SLS head is what makes it special. 85 crank is special too. larger centering hole for the torque converter. You can put a 84 TQ on a 85 crank, but it won't be self-centering. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-22 Thread Tom Hargrave
To: Mercedes Discussion List Subject: Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD I will buy the old head from you. If you want a good engine and don't care about $ as much go with Metric Motors. 85 is the same as the others, the SLS head is what makes it special. With a shortblock you

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-22 Thread Loren Faeth
IF the head on the trashed engine is good, then buy a short block. If the head has more than a couple of small cracks, i'd be inclined to buy a long block if it is not too pricey. Last I knew MB only supplied short blocks. Do check prices from several MB dealers who cater to MBCA. Often

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-22 Thread Rolf
I would think the hole is smaller not larger as the bearing required some trimming for the manual swap? -Rolf Mitch Haley wrote: Rolf wrote: 85 is the same as the others, the SLS head is what makes it special. 85 crank is special too. larger centering hole for the torque converter.

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-22 Thread andrew strasfogel
If my mechanic does the work what would be his extra labor to do the short block vs. engine replacement? How can he tell whether the head is still good? On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Rolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would think the hole is smaller not larger as the bearing required some

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-22 Thread Mitch Haley
andrew strasfogel wrote: If my mechanic does the work what would be his extra labor to do the short block vs. engine replacement? Probably no more than his charge to remove the replacement engine from your old car. If you're paying labor it gets expensive in a hurry no matter which way you

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-22 Thread R A Bennell
block vs. long block - 1983 300TD As feared, my new rust free 1983 wagon does indeed have a bad engine. :((I was thinking of taking the drive train from my decent running 1983 rusty 300TD, but this seems somewhat criminal; I would rather sell it as a daily driver to someone willing to give

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-22 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
your best bet would be to put the engine in from the rusty wagon. Its value is in the engine. andrew strasfogel wrote: As feared, my new rust free 1983 wagon does indeed have a bad engine. :((I was thinking of taking the drive train from my decent running 1983 rusty 300TD, but this seems

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-22 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
No, 85 is different than 81-84. Rolf wrote: I will buy the old head from you. If you want a good engine and don't care about $ as much go with Metric Motors. 85 is the same as the others, the SLS head is what makes it special. With a shortblock you will be reusing the old head. -Rolf

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-22 Thread Mitch Haley
I almost forgot. The body donor is the car that was run out of oil until it wouldn't run, right? The only thing worth saving on that engine is probably the SLS pump and fuel system. If you bought a short block, then you'd still need a cam, cam bearings, rocker arms, valves, guides (and those

Re: [MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-22 Thread Luther
That is a posibility, since Kaleb traded me his solid 617 block for my cracked 603 head. Luther On Thu, 22 May 2008 08:51:30 -0500, Loren Faeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IF the head on the trashed engine is good, then buy a short block. If the head has more than a couple of small cracks, i'd

[MBZ] short block vs. long block - 1983 300TD

2008-05-21 Thread andrew strasfogel
As feared, my new rust free 1983 wagon does indeed have a bad engine. :((I was thinking of taking the drive train from my decent running 1983 rusty 300TD, but this seems somewhat criminal; I would rather sell it as a daily driver to someone willing to give it a new lease on life. Finding