We will see just how much Green New Deal power there is if that idiot from WA
has his way. He has gotten the SEA persecutor to now want to go after the
fossil fuel industry in town. Makes you wonder how these idiots will heat
their homes in the winter. Fire wood? Not going to be oil or
I see all points, unlike you.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 2:26 PM Randy Bennell via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
>
> Andrew refuses to see the point, but continues to drive his dirty old
> diesel.
>
>
>
> On 25/06/2019 9:30 AM, Dwight Giles via Mercedes wrote:
> > I think you missed the
Andrew refuses to see the point, but continues to drive his dirty old
diesel.
On 25/06/2019 9:30 AM, Dwight Giles via Mercedes wrote:
I think you missed the humor.
Dwight Giles Jr.
Wickford RI
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019, 10:29 AM Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
The bottom line is that there is no free lunch - it takes a lot of energy
to travel quickly, and producing that has costs - it's just a matter of
where you leave the pollution, and how wide an area you spread it over.
There is quite an environmental impact from the production of those "clean"
Yes, I did. Probably not the first time. Still, I feel the need to step up
for EVs.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:30 AM Dwight Giles
wrote:
> I think you missed the humor.
>
> Dwight Giles Jr.
> Wickford RI
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019, 10:29 AM Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes <
>
I think you missed the humor.
Dwight Giles Jr.
Wickford RI
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019, 10:29 AM Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> We are talking about emissions - not the attendant impacts of manufacture.
> If you expand the scope of this comparison then you must also
We are talking about emissions - not the attendant impacts of manufacture.
If you expand the scope of this comparison then you must also consider the
huge footprint of the fossil fuel extraction industry.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 3:03 AM fmiser via Mercedes
wrote:
> > G wrote:
>
> > Equally, I
> G wrote:
> Equally, I raise the point that, nuclear, solar, geothermal,
> wind, hydro, all come with their own set of environmental
> impacts, which in some cases are extremely far reaching.
> The main difference as I see it between Diesel and EV is simply
> the poorly accounted long term
Equally, I raise the point that, nuclear, solar, geothermal, wind, hydro,
all come with their own set of environmental impacts, which in some cases
are extremely far reaching.
The main difference as I see it between Diesel and EV is simply the poorly
accounted long term impacts of the manufacture
You missed the point. The EV could have been charged from non-fossil fuel
burning sources (nuclear, solar, geothermal, wind, hydro).
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 12:36 PM Curley McLain via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> The "diesel" caption should say "YOU are so dirty" coming from a
The "diesel" caption should say "YOU are so dirty" coming from a greenie
weenie along side the road, or the "electric" driver.
Greg Fiorentino via Mercedes wrote on 6/22/19 12:43 PM:
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives
OTOH, if the power plant were wind or solar = or even a nuke - then it's a
different story.
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 7:35 PM Craig via Mercedes
wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 10:43:48 -0700 Greg Fiorentino via Mercedes
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
>
> Thanks for sending it. I have already posted it on
On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 10:43:48 -0700 Greg Fiorentino via Mercedes
wrote:
>
>
Thanks for sending it. I have already posted it on another list, with the
comment I just received it on another list.
Craig
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives
13 matches
Mail list logo
