Rick Knoble wrote:
http://omaha.craigslist.org/car/621358003.html
The little old lady who didn't drive much drove it 65k in 8 years, then the
2nd owner drove it 10k in 7 years? I wonder if he had an instrument failure
and had the replacement set to 10k over the number on the title from 2001.
Rick wrote:
A little pricey if you ask me, but if the mileage is correct it could be worth
it. Donald Snook, is this your next car ?
Not until i sell my Explorer. But, it could be nice car if the mileage is
correct. I have never seen a 93. I guess this is the 2.5. I assume a 93 has a
Donald Snook wrote:
I have never seen a 93. I guess this is the 2.5. I assume a 93 has a 2.5,
but I have never seen one. Did the 94-95 have the 3.0 six cylinder?
87: OM603, 3.0, I-6
90-93: OM602, 2.5, I-5
94-95: OM606, 3.0, I-6 24v, non turbo
___
Donald Snook [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So, is it worth it to drive the diesel
over the gas car. It might be only becuase if I drive for work, I get
reimbursed and a 124 diesel gets great highway mileage. But, in general
it looks like a wash.
My thinking, unsupported by any hard evidence, is
How's the comfort level and overall satisfaction of owning and driving a
W124 Diesel compared to the Expedition? That would make all the difference
to me. Another thought is that the maintenance on the Mercedes may be a bit
more simply since it's older.
Kevin in Hillsboro, OR
1983 300sD
Subject: Re: [MBZ] 124 Diesel Low Miles In Nebraska
How's the comfort level and overall satisfaction of owning and driving a
W124 Diesel compared to the Expedition? That would make all the
difference
to me. Another thought is that the maintenance on the Mercedes may be a
bit
more simply since
Kevin Kraly wrote:
Another thought is that the maintenance on the Mercedes may be a bit
more simply since it's older.
Simpler yes, but there might be more of it. Pick your poison.
John
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor:
Thats not really too much money if its as described
Rick Knoble wrote:
http://omaha.craigslist.org/car/621358003.html
A little pricey if you ask me, but if the mileage is correct it could be
worth it. Donald Snook, is this your next car ?
Not Mine, No Affiliation, ect.
Rick Knoble
Except you will get 32-33mpg in a 2.5 turbo, at least thats what I get
on mine, that Im probably fixing to sell in order to buy another
interesting car. Except my 2.5 turbo will be quite a bit cheaper than
this one.
Donald Snook wrote:
Rick wrote:
A little pricey if you ask me, but if the
So thats approx 1400 a year in fuel.
Donald Snook wrote:
Rick wrote:
A little pricey if you ask me, but if the mileage is correct it could be
worth it. Donald Snook, is this your next car ?
Not until i sell my Explorer. But, it could be nice car if the mileage is
correct. I have
no diesel in 94 in the US
Mitch Haley wrote:
Donald Snook wrote:
I have never seen a 93. I guess this is the 2.5. I assume a 93 has a 2.5,
but I have never seen one. Did the 94-95 have the 3.0 six cylinder?
87: OM603, 3.0, I-6
90-93: OM602, 2.5, I-5
94-95: OM606, 3.0, I-6 24v, non
11 matches
Mail list logo
