Re: [MBZ] 1994 S Class Diesels, Bad Heads?

2006-03-20 Thread Alex Chamberlain
On 3/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > While looking at the photos of the SDL on eBay, I just realized that the > W124 300D looks amazingly similar to the W140 350SDL! > > Obviously, the interior of the W140 is much more luxurious than the W124, > but the exterior photos rea

Re: [MBZ] 1994 S Class Diesels, Bad Heads?

2006-03-20 Thread Desert Rat
> http://members.rennlist.com/my_911/Index.htm For my Paint Job Info > - Original Message - > From: "John Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Mercedes mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 9:32 PM > Subject: [MB

Re: [MBZ] 1994 S Class Diesels, Bad Heads?

2006-03-20 Thread l02turner
Stuff http://members.rennlist.com/webercarbs http://members.rennlist.com/my_911/Index.htm For my Paint Job Info - Original Message - From: "John Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mercedes mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 9:32 P

Re: [MBZ] 1994 S Class Diesels, Bad Heads?

2006-03-19 Thread redghost
The heads should be just fine. It is the rods that end up ovaling the engine On Saturday, March 18, 2006, at 06:32 PM, John Peterson wrote: Did Mercedes fix the bad head issues with the S's by the 1994 year? I was looking at the biggie http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Mercedes-Benz-300-Ser

Re: [MBZ] 1994 S Class Diesels, Bad Heads?

2006-03-19 Thread Marshall Booth
John Peterson wrote: Did Mercedes fix the bad head issues with the S's by the 1994 year? I was looking at the biggie http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Mercedes-Benz-300-Series-S-350-DIESEL-S350-94-MERCEDES-RARE-IMMACULATE_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ6336QQitemZ4622935201QQrdZ1 It is sad that such

Re: [MBZ] 1994 S Class Diesels, Bad Heads?

2006-03-19 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
I wouldnt say the heads are bullet proof, just less prone to cracking than the earlier 603's Desert Rat wrote: The technical term we use to describe these vehicles are "rod benders", John. Heads were bullet proof .It's the egg shaped cylinders due to weak rods is what caused most of the 350 d

Re: [MBZ] 1994 S Class Diesels, Bad Heads?

2006-03-19 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
yep, and made the bottom end junk. John Peterson wrote: Did Mercedes fix the bad head issues with the S's by the 1994 year? I was looking at the biggie http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Mercedes-Benz-300-Series-S-350-DIESEL-S350-94-MERCEDES-RARE-IMMACULATE_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ6336QQitemZ

Re: [MBZ] 1994 S Class Diesels, Bad Heads?

2006-03-19 Thread dave walton
Mine blew the head gasket at 181k miles. While I was inside I also replaced the bent #1 connecting rod. Wonderful cars - until they break. Later heads have a redesigned oil passage in front of the #1 cylinder. I don't hear people complaining about cracked heads on these. The one on eBay looks to h

Re: [MBZ] 1994 S Class Diesels, Bad Heads?

2006-03-19 Thread Desert Rat
The technical term we use to describe these vehicles are "rod benders", John. Heads were bullet proof .It's the egg shaped cylinders due to weak rods is what caused most of the 350 diesel engines to become boat anchors. You need to find one with a new MB crate engine and not just rebuilt. On 3

[MBZ] 1994 S Class Diesels, Bad Heads?

2006-03-19 Thread John Peterson
Did Mercedes fix the bad head issues with the S's by the 1994 year? I was looking at the biggie http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Mercedes-Benz-300-Series-S-350-DIESEL-S350-94-MERCEDES-RARE-IMMACULATE_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ6336QQitemZ4622935201QQrdZ1 It is sad that such a comfortable body had