"reverse does not work fully" ??
On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Max Dillon via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> I would get either #1 or #4.
> --
> Max Dillon
> Charleston SC
> '87 300TD
> '95 E300
>
> On December 9, 2017 8:15:53 PM EST, Robert Massmann via Mercedes <
> mercedes@okie
I would get either #1 or #4.
--
Max Dillon
Charleston SC
'87 300TD
'95 E300
On December 9, 2017 8:15:53 PM EST, Robert Massmann via Mercedes
wrote:
>I would be interested in the 2007 E320 to replace my 95 E300D, but need
>to take care of some other financial matters first!
>
>1..
>https://cinci
I would be interested in the 2007 E320 to replace my 95 E300D, but need to take
care of some other financial matters first!
1..
https://cincinnati.craigslist.org/cto/d/95-mercedes-e300-diesel/6354484278.html
2..
https://cincinnati.craigslist.org/cto/d/2008-mercedes-gl320-cdi/6408949130.htm
Alex C. wrote:
"I didn't think 124 wheels would fit over the brakes on a 116/126/107/etc.
without spacers, but Snook says they will, so what do I know. (Or maybe he has
126 wheels on a 124?)"
I don't know if all 124 wheels will "fit" a 126 without spacers. But, the 124
wheels that I got off o
I have a set of 15" fifteen hole rims with an offset of 21.5mm. I presume
they're off of a W126. The same type of rim for my 124 has an offset of
49mm. I think W140 has something like 52mm
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> no the 140 and 126 is not
no the 140 and 126 is not the same offset, dont ask me what they are but
I know they are different
Alex Chamberlain wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Mitch Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://nh.craigslist.org/car/600106582.html - This has to be a scam... Aside
>> from the ugly wh
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Mitch Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Alex Chamberlain wrote:
> > Could be late 124/early 210 wheels with spacers.
>
> I thought it looked like those wheels without spacers.
> Handling should be interesting if I'm right.
>
It does kind of look like that.
Alex Chamberlain wrote:
> Could be late 124/early 210 wheels with spacers.
I thought it looked like those wheels without spacers.
Handling should be interesting if I'm right.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buy
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Mitch Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://nh.craigslist.org/car/600106582.html - This has to be a scam... Aside
> from the ugly wheels it looks awesome.
>
> I don't believe that there are any 8 hole wheels which are of appropriate
> offset
> for a W116.
>
Mitch Haley wrote:
> http://nh.craigslist.org/car/600106582.html - This has to be a scam... Aside
> from the ugly wheels it looks awesome.
>
> I don't believe that there are any 8 hole wheels which are of appropriate
> offset
> for a W116.
I think I've seen some on a W126. Is that possible? If
That Jetta may or may not have the "eco-diesel" engine, which has a turbo,
but no boost enrichment apparatus. These engines can run for a very long
time, as long as the timing belt is changed religiously at or before the
interval schedule.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Curt Raymond <[EMAIL PR
http://nh.craigslist.org/car/600106582.html - This has to be a scam... Aside
from the ugly wheels it looks awesome.
I don't believe that there are any 8 hole wheels which are of appropriate offset
for a W116.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see offici
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Curt Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://nh.craigslist.org/car/600106582.html - This has to be a scam... Aside
> from the ugly wheels it looks awesome.
Remember, nobody wants 116s and it probably has broken ACC.
Agree with you about the chrome '90s whe
http://nh.craigslist.org/car/604974274.html - Fresh out of storage makes me
nervous.
http://nh.craigslist.org/car/603599882.html - is this high mileage for a diesel
Jetta? This is the painfully slow one right?
http://nh.craigslist.org/car/600106582.html - This has to be a scam... Aside
from th
14 matches
Mail list logo
