Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-10 Thread andrew strasfogel
Stupid??  The SLS pump in my 83 wagon  has lasted for 25 years/323,000
miles.

On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:44 PM, David Bruckmann 
bruckma...@transcontinental.ca wrote:

 There's another option that may be somewhat simpler: plumb in another
 belt-driven high-pressure pump instead of the stupid timing-chain-driven MB
 pump.

 At least some of the W124 wagons have a dual-pressure, belt-driven pump
 (124-460-15-80 Vickers) for steering/self-levelling. That could almost
 certainly be adapted to a W123...

 D.

 At 10:48 PM + 10/9/09, mercedes-requ...@okiebenz.com wrote:
 Message: 11
 Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:13:22 -0700
 From: tyler casi...@usermail.com
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
 To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
 
 Well, were they done properly? There's no inherent reason why a wagon
 wouldn't handle fine with a regular rear suspension. I'd be willing to
 bet that most of these conversions use stock sedan springs/shocks from a
 junkyard, which aren't stiff enough for a wagon. If I were going to do
 the swap I would cut the sedan springs down and add an aluminum spacer
 to get the correct ride height and spring rate, and get rear shocks that
 are valved properly for the increased rear weight (Bilstein will revalve
 their shocks cheaply). This would certainly be a lot cheaper and easier
 than replacing an engine- and would allow one to customize the spring
 and shock rate for the way they use their wagon. There's also a good
 chance that an aftermarket spring company somewhere makes the correct
 springs for this conversion.
 
 Other options that would work well are nivomat self contained leveling
 shocks, and air bags in the springs.
 
 I'm annoyed that people on here mostly parrot what Marshall said without
 understanding the context.

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091010/4575e113/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-10 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
Especially when you load it down and it stays at the correct height.  
Anybody remember this:


http://www.okiebenz.com/funny/wagonoverload/

andrew strasfogel wrote:

PEOPLE!
I have two wagons - one with its original SLS and the other a spring/shock
conversion to go with a replacement non-300TD engine.  You are welcome to
test drive and compare.  I have done this many times, however, and while I
can state with certainty that the non-SLS 300TD is safe to drive, the
correctly suspended (?) 300TD has a more comfortable, stable suspension and
is there fore more fun to drive.



On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Tyler casi...@usermail.com wrote:

  

Modifications aren't about knowing more than Mercedes or re-inventing the
wheel- fitting a proper rate spring and damper to give you the handling you
want isn't magic or rocket science- there are dozens of books about it and
it's done properly on almost every car made, including the vast majority of
W123s. The ONLY difference is that the wagon has more weight in the rear end
and cargo capacity, requiring a different spring rate and dampener valve.
How different? Look at the same engineering books as the magic mercedes
engineers looked at, and calculate it the same way they did for the sedan.
Why did they go to all of the extra trouble and expense of the hydraulic
system then? Because it gives a smoother ride, and it's a good marketing
gimmick- not because a spring is dangerous or less reliable. I for one
prefer a stiffer ride and better handling than most car buyers, so it's
reasonable for me to modify the suspension on my vehicles accordingly- and I
do careful research and make conservative changes to ensure that the result
is safe and reliable.

There's nothing wrong with modifying a vehicle to suit your needs, if you
know what you're doing and why you're doing it. It doesn't have to mean that
you think the origional engineers were wrong to do what they did, or that
you know more, just that the circumstances are extremely different. I have
had excellent luck adding and removing features, and making minor changes to
many different brands of car to allow them to work properly under the
conditions I use them in, which are often somewhat different from those they
were designed for. I don't, for example consider the fact that I prefer to
add a loud audible alarm to my oil pressure and coolant level sensors an
assault on the competence of the company who decided not to include one from
the factory.

Sincerely,
Tyler


On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Loren Faeth wrote:

 I have done quite a few engine swaps, even put a v-8 in a body made for 6


cyl inline ONLY.  That was an adventure.

I have worked on everything from tractors to medium duty trucks, houses,
commercial buildings concrete, etc.

I do not presume to know more about suspension than the team of
German-trained engineers (real engineers) that designed the 123 SLS system.

tyler, have at it, but I sincerely hope you are never coming toward me
with your frankenheap on an Icy curve with a bump on a rainy night.


At 06:34 PM 10/9/2009, you wrote:

  

*Ahem*

I believe the term here is put up or shut up. If its so easy just take
a long weekend at Andrew's and show us how awesome you can make his car. I'm
sure he'd give you dinner...

-Curt

Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:48:30 -0700
From: tyler casi...@usermail.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Message-ID: 4acfbdbe.4020...@usermail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

It IS trivial to use a spring with the correct spring rate... Anyone
that can do an engine swap, could do this much cheaper and easier.

Tyler

Peter T. Arnold wrote:


GO for it!  Redesign it. I'm sure that the effort would be trivial to
a fellow like you.
  


-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091009/cfb2e204/attachment.html

___

http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Loren Faeth

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

  

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http

Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-10 Thread OK Don
YES! That's the exact picture that I see in my mind when the springs vs SLS
discussion comes up 

On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Kaleb C. Striplin ka...@striplin.netwrote:

 Especially when you load it down and it stays at the correct height.
  Anybody remember this:

 http://www.okiebenz.com/funny/wagonoverload/


 --
 OK Don
 CONSERVATIVE, n.  A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as
 distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them with
 others.
 The Devil's Dictionary
 Ambrose Bierce


-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091010/081f49aa/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-10 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
Well, that wagon had fully working SLS, but I have it WAY overloaded.  
But yes, even with very little in the back, that is EXACTLY what the car 
will do if it was converted to springs.  No amount of stiffening will 
get rid of that.  If you did put in a stiff enough spring, when the car 
was unloaded, I would imagine it would be about like a pogo stick going 
down the road.


OK Don wrote:

YES! That's the exact picture that I see in my mind when the springs vs SLS
discussion comes up 

On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Kaleb C. Striplin ka...@striplin.netwrote:

  

Especially when you load it down and it stays at the correct height.
 Anybody remember this:

http://www.okiebenz.com/funny/wagonoverload/


--
OK Don
CONSERVATIVE, n.  A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as
distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them with
others.
The Devil's Dictionary
Ambrose Bierce




-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091010/081f49aa/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.113/2400 - Release Date: 09/28/09 05:51:00


  


--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
95 E300, 92 500SEL, 92 300SD, 92 300E 4Matic, 91 300D, 91 300E, 
89 560SEL, 87 300SDL x2, 85 380SE 5.0 Euro, 85 190D, 84 190D, 
84 300D euro manny, 81 240D, 80 240D, 76 240D, 76 300D, 
http://www.okiebenz.com


-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091010/c134c76e/attachment.html
-- next part --

Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.113/2400 - Release Date: 09/28/09 05:51:00

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-10 Thread Curt Raymond
Tyler,

Just out of curiousity can you actually answer a question many of us have asked 
you?

Have you ever actually driven a 123 wagon?

-Curt

Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 20:32:51 -0700
From: Tyler casi...@usermail.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Message-ID: 9fc5cfa6-65f4-4d5d-9256-5a2548418...@usermail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes

Modifications aren't about knowing more than Mercedes or re-inventing  
the wheel- fitting a proper rate spring and damper to give you the  
handling you want isn't magic or rocket science- there are dozens of  
books about it and it's done properly on almost every car made,  
including the vast majority of W123s. The ONLY difference is that the  
wagon has more weight in the rear end and cargo capacity, requiring a  
different spring rate and dampener valve. How different? Look at the  
same engineering books as the magic mercedes engineers looked at,  
and calculate it the same way they did for the sedan. Why did they go  
to all of the extra trouble and expense of the hydraulic system then?  
Because it gives a smoother ride, and it's a good marketing gimmick-  
not because a spring is dangerous or less reliable. I for one prefer a  
stiffer ride and better handling than most car buyers, so it's  
reasonable for me to modify the suspension on my vehicles accordingly-  
and I do careful research and make conservative changes to ensure that  
the result is safe and reliable.

There's nothing wrong with modifying a vehicle to suit your needs, if  
you know what you're doing and why you're doing it. It doesn't have to  
mean that you think the origional engineers were wrong to do what they  
did, or that you know more, just that the circumstances are extremely  
different. I have had excellent luck adding and removing features, and  
making minor changes to many different brands of car to allow them to  
work properly under the conditions I use them in, which are often  
somewhat different from those they were designed for. I don't, for  
example consider the fact that I prefer to add a loud audible alarm to  
my oil pressure and coolant level sensors an assault on the competence  
of the company who decided not to include one from the factory.

Sincerely,
Tyler


  
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091010/3b141d65/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-10 Thread Curt Raymond
My favorite part of my wagon was loading a bunch of people into it and feeling 
it rise to the right height. I think there was something wrong in that the car 
would leak down when it was off if you put a bunch of weight in (2 large folks 
in the back seat for instance) but as soon as it went into gear it would figure 
itself out.

On Andrew's problem he really just needs an SLS equipped head right? Would it 
be more expensive to just swap heads than swap engines? Seems like while the 
head was off you'd get a good look at the engine too and have the opportunity 
to make sure everything was okay, and replace the headgasket of course.

Man, all this talk makes me want another wagon.

-Curt

Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:58:21 -0500
From: Kaleb C. Striplin ka...@striplin.net
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Message-ID: 4ad0af1d.7010...@striplin.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; Format=flowed

Especially when you load it down and it stays at the correct height.  
Anybody remember this:

http://www.okiebenz.com/funny/wagonoverload/

andrew strasfogel wrote:
 PEOPLE!
 I have two wagons - one with its original SLS and the other a spring/shock
 conversion to go with a replacement non-300TD engine.  You are welcome to
 test drive and compare.  I have done this many times, however, and while I
 can state with certainty that the non-SLS 300TD is safe to drive, the
 correctly suspended (?) 300TD has a more comfortable, stable suspension and
 is there fore more fun to drive.


  
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091010/ae486647/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-10 Thread Curt Raymond
Ever drive one with bad spheres?
My friend owned one which I later bought that had bad spheres, it was like 
driving a pogo stick. He had it one whole winter like that, I could never 
understand why anybody would want one. When he got the spheres replaced it all 
of a sudden made sense...

-Curt

Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:24:00 -0500
From: Kaleb C. Striplin ka...@striplin.net
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Message-ID: 4ad0df50.2040...@striplin.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; Format=flowed

Well, that wagon had fully working SLS, but I have it WAY overloaded.  
But yes, even with very little in the back, that is EXACTLY what the car 
will do if it was converted to springs.  No amount of stiffening will 
get rid of that.  If you did put in a stiff enough spring, when the car 
was unloaded, I would imagine it would be about like a pogo stick going 
down the road.


  
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091010/473bea3f/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-10 Thread Rich Thomas
The little link to the valve on my wagon broke one day, the back popped 
up about a block from home, I felt like I was back in my buddy's 67 
Chevy we put air shocks and big tires on back in high school.  It looked 
pretty funny.


--R

Curt Raymond wrote:

My favorite part of my wagon was loading a bunch of people into it and feeling 
it rise to the right height. I think there was something wrong in that the car 
would leak down when it was off if you put a bunch of weight in (2 large folks 
in the back seat for instance) but as soon as it went into gear it would figure 
itself out.



___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-10 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin

I once had to use a sedan engine in a wagon and do the head swap.

Curt Raymond wrote:

My favorite part of my wagon was loading a bunch of people into it and feeling 
it rise to the right height. I think there was something wrong in that the car 
would leak down when it was off if you put a bunch of weight in (2 large folks 
in the back seat for instance) but as soon as it went into gear it would figure 
itself out.

On Andrew's problem he really just needs an SLS equipped head right? Would it 
be more expensive to just swap heads than swap engines? Seems like while the 
head was off you'd get a good look at the engine too and have the opportunity 
to make sure everything was okay, and replace the headgasket of course.

Man, all this talk makes me want another wagon.

-Curt

  


--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
95 E300, 92 500SEL, 92 300SD, 92 300E 4Matic, 91 300D, 91 300E, 
89 560SEL, 87 300SDL x2, 85 380SE 5.0 Euro, 85 190D, 84 190D, 
84 300D euro manny, 81 240D, 80 240D, 76 240D, 76 300D, 
http://www.okiebenz.com

-- next part --

Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.113/2400 - Release Date: 09/28/09 05:51:00

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-10 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin

Yep, I have.

Curt Raymond wrote:

Ever drive one with bad spheres?
My friend owned one which I later bought that had bad spheres, it was like 
driving a pogo stick. He had it one whole winter like that, I could never 
understand why anybody would want one. When he got the spheres replaced it all 
of a sudden made sense...

-Curt
  


--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
95 E300, 92 500SEL, 92 300SD, 92 300E 4Matic, 91 300D, 91 300E, 
89 560SEL, 87 300SDL x2, 85 380SE 5.0 Euro, 85 190D, 84 190D, 
84 300D euro manny, 81 240D, 80 240D, 76 240D, 76 300D, 
http://www.okiebenz.com

-- next part --

Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.113/2400 - Release Date: 09/28/09 05:51:00

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-09 Thread Gary Hurst
I've never heard of a suspension converted MB wagon that wasn't a
complete disaster

What the hell am i doing up at this hour?

On 10/7/09, pm7...@comcast.net pm7...@comcast.net wrote:
 Marshal always gave the admonishment that any backyard attempt to convert
 the rear suspension would result in a very expensive  uncomfortable
 suspension.

 USUALLY IN CAPS


 --

 Peter Arnold

 Windsor, CT

 - Original Message -
 From: Meade M CIV SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC Dillon, 53310
 meade.m.dil...@navy.mil
 To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
 Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 6:57:52 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

 Do you have such a bastardized car? Almost every such car I've heard of
 was judged to be a very poor handling car compared to the original SLS.

 Max

 -Original Message-
 From: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com
 [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of Tyler
 Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 3:26 AM
 To: Mercedes Discussion List
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

 Assuming you have the proper spring rate (not just sedan springs), and
 bilstein HD shocks that are valved properly for a wagon- Surely it would
 handle at least as good as a brand new self leveling system- and better
 if you made it a little stiffer (which would also eliminate the need for
 the leveling feature). I personally think the SLS is mostly a marketing
 gimmick- especially on a car that isn't designed for heavy duty towing.
 I guess it lets them get by with softer springs than they otherwise
 would need to prevent sag when loaded, which makes the ride
 softer- but certainly doesn't improve handling over a set of stiff
 regular springs.

 Sincerely,
 Tyler
 1987 190D Turbo Biodiesel

 On Oct 6, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:

 We are talking about a wagon here, correct? Putting in regular
 springs in a wagon makes for better handling? I think not. The SLS
 when working properly handles VERY well. It is a very simple system,
 very little goes wrong. That think will never be right if you just
 put springs in it.

 tyler wrote:
 It sounds like a lot of work and expense to reinstall the self
 levelling system- I'd just keep the regular rear suspension myself.
 Simpler, more reliable, and better handling. If it sags in the rear
 when you load it up, just get stiffer springs or some spacers. I've
 used overload springs with stock height, but a 20% stiffer rate on
 my Volvo wagons that I do a lot of towing with. It handles a little
 better, and doesn't really sag at all when I load it up- but I didn't

 notice any reduction in the ride quality.

 Tyler

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives
 http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
 http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091007/7cf0a594/attachment.html
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


-- 
Sent from my mobile device

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-09 Thread andrew strasfogel
My 1985 300TD with the rear Bilstean shocks and disconnectged SLS isn't a
disaster but it definitely doesn't ride or handle as nicely as my genuine
SLS 1983 300TD, with 322k miles.
So who wants my 1985 300D motor for FREE so I can install the proper engine
and hook up my SLS?


On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Gary Hurst jabbahur...@gmail.com wrote:

 I've never heard of a suspension converted MB wagon that wasn't a
 complete disaster

 What the hell am i doing up at this hour?

 On 10/7/09, pm7...@comcast.net pm7...@comcast.net wrote:
  Marshal always gave the admonishment that any backyard attempt to convert
  the rear suspension would result in a very expensive  uncomfortable
  suspension.
 
  USUALLY IN CAPS
 
 
  --
 
  Peter Arnold
 
  Windsor, CT
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Meade M CIV SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC Dillon, 53310
  meade.m.dil...@navy.mil
  To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
  Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 6:57:52 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
  Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
 
  Do you have such a bastardized car? Almost every such car I've heard of
  was judged to be a very poor handling car compared to the original SLS.
 
  Max
 
  -Original Message-
  From: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com
  [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of Tyler
  Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 3:26 AM
  To: Mercedes Discussion List
  Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
 
  Assuming you have the proper spring rate (not just sedan springs), and
  bilstein HD shocks that are valved properly for a wagon- Surely it would
  handle at least as good as a brand new self leveling system- and better
  if you made it a little stiffer (which would also eliminate the need for
  the leveling feature). I personally think the SLS is mostly a marketing
  gimmick- especially on a car that isn't designed for heavy duty towing.
  I guess it lets them get by with softer springs than they otherwise
  would need to prevent sag when loaded, which makes the ride
  softer- but certainly doesn't improve handling over a set of stiff
  regular springs.
 
  Sincerely,
  Tyler
  1987 190D Turbo Biodiesel
 
  On Oct 6, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:
 
  We are talking about a wagon here, correct? Putting in regular
  springs in a wagon makes for better handling? I think not. The SLS
  when working properly handles VERY well. It is a very simple system,
  very little goes wrong. That think will never be right if you just
  put springs in it.
 
  tyler wrote:
  It sounds like a lot of work and expense to reinstall the self
  levelling system- I'd just keep the regular rear suspension myself.
  Simpler, more reliable, and better handling. If it sags in the rear
  when you load it up, just get stiffer springs or some spacers. I've
  used overload springs with stock height, but a 20% stiffer rate on
  my Volvo wagons that I do a lot of towing with. It handles a little
  better, and doesn't really sag at all when I load it up- but I didn't
 
  notice any reduction in the ride quality.
 
  Tyler
 
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
  For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives
  http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
  For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
  To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
  -- next part --
  An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
  URL:
  
 http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091007/7cf0a594/attachment.html
 
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
  For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
  To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 

 --
 Sent from my mobile device

 ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091009/5a8488b1/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-09 Thread andrew strasfogel
Should be BILSTEIN shocks.



On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:24 AM, andrew strasfogel astrasfo...@gmail.comwrote:

 My 1985 300TD with the rear Bilstean shocks and disconnectged SLS isn't a
 disaster but it definitely doesn't ride or handle as nicely as my genuine
 SLS 1983 300TD, with 322k miles.
 So who wants my 1985 300D motor for FREE so I can install the proper engine
 and hook up my SLS?


 On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Gary Hurst jabbahur...@gmail.com wrote:

 I've never heard of a suspension converted MB wagon that wasn't a
 complete disaster

 What the hell am i doing up at this hour?

 On 10/7/09, pm7...@comcast.net pm7...@comcast.net wrote:
  Marshal always gave the admonishment that any backyard attempt to
 convert
  the rear suspension would result in a very expensive  uncomfortable
  suspension.
 
  USUALLY IN CAPS
 
 
  --
 
  Peter Arnold
 
  Windsor, CT
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Meade M CIV SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC Dillon, 53310
  meade.m.dil...@navy.mil
  To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
  Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 6:57:52 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
  Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
 
  Do you have such a bastardized car? Almost every such car I've heard of
  was judged to be a very poor handling car compared to the original SLS.
 
  Max
 
  -Original Message-
  From: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com
  [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of Tyler
  Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 3:26 AM
  To: Mercedes Discussion List
  Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
 
  Assuming you have the proper spring rate (not just sedan springs), and
  bilstein HD shocks that are valved properly for a wagon- Surely it would
  handle at least as good as a brand new self leveling system- and better
  if you made it a little stiffer (which would also eliminate the need for
  the leveling feature). I personally think the SLS is mostly a marketing
  gimmick- especially on a car that isn't designed for heavy duty towing.
  I guess it lets them get by with softer springs than they otherwise
  would need to prevent sag when loaded, which makes the ride
  softer- but certainly doesn't improve handling over a set of stiff
  regular springs.
 
  Sincerely,
  Tyler
  1987 190D Turbo Biodiesel
 
  On Oct 6, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:
 
  We are talking about a wagon here, correct? Putting in regular
  springs in a wagon makes for better handling? I think not. The SLS
  when working properly handles VERY well. It is a very simple system,
  very little goes wrong. That think will never be right if you just
  put springs in it.
 
  tyler wrote:
  It sounds like a lot of work and expense to reinstall the self
  levelling system- I'd just keep the regular rear suspension myself.
  Simpler, more reliable, and better handling. If it sags in the rear
  when you load it up, just get stiffer springs or some spacers. I've
  used overload springs with stock height, but a 20% stiffer rate on
  my Volvo wagons that I do a lot of towing with. It handles a little
  better, and doesn't really sag at all when I load it up- but I didn't
 
  notice any reduction in the ride quality.
 
  Tyler
 
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
  For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives
  http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
  For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
  To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
  -- next part --
  An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
  URL:
  
 http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091007/7cf0a594/attachment.html
 
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
  For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
  To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 

 --
 Sent from my mobile device

 ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091009/4acfa446/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go

Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-09 Thread tyler
Well, were they done properly? There's no inherent reason why a wagon 
wouldn't handle fine with a regular rear suspension. I'd be willing to 
bet that most of these conversions use stock sedan springs/shocks from a 
junkyard, which aren't stiff enough for a wagon. If I were going to do 
the swap I would cut the sedan springs down and add an aluminum spacer 
to get the correct ride height and spring rate, and get rear shocks that 
are valved properly for the increased rear weight (Bilstein will revalve 
their shocks cheaply). This would certainly be a lot cheaper and easier 
than replacing an engine- and would allow one to customize the spring 
and shock rate for the way they use their wagon. There's also a good 
chance that an aftermarket spring company somewhere makes the correct 
springs for this conversion.


Other options that would work well are nivomat self contained leveling 
shocks, and air bags in the springs.


I'm annoyed that people on here mostly parrot what Marshall said without 
understanding the context.


Tyler

Gary Hurst wrote:

I've never heard of a suspension converted MB wagon that wasn't a
complete disaster

What the hell am i doing up at this hour?

On 10/7/09, pm7...@comcast.net pm7...@comcast.net wrote:
  

Marshal always gave the admonishment that any backyard attempt to convert
the rear suspension would result in a very expensive  uncomfortable
suspension.

USUALLY IN CAPS


--

Peter Arnold

Windsor, CT




___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-09 Thread Peter T. Arnold



GO for it!  Redesign it. I'm sure that the effort would be trivial to a 
fellow like you.


I'm annoyed that people on here mostly parrot what Marshall said 
without understanding the context.
When you have a minute between engineering changes on your suspension, 
why not find a new list?




Tyler


--
Pete Arnold

This e-mail from Peter Arnold and any attachments to it are 
confidential to the intended recipient and may also be uncensored. If 
you have received it in error please consult your religious adviser.   
If you are not the intended recipient, why have you read this far?  
Please do not staple, spindle or otherwise mutilate this document, 
doing so may damage your screen.  All communications may be subject to 
interception or monitoring by the men in black helicopters for 
security purposes. Please rely on your own swine flu virus checking as 
the sender cannot accept any liability for any damage arising from any 
bug or virus infection.


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-09 Thread Gary Hurst
So in theory it could be done right.  This doesn't quite negate the
power of the fact that none of us has ever seen such a creature

On 10/9/09, tyler casi...@usermail.com wrote:
 Well, were they done properly? There's no inherent reason why a wagon
 wouldn't handle fine with a regular rear suspension. I'd be willing to
 bet that most of these conversions use stock sedan springs/shocks from a
 junkyard, which aren't stiff enough for a wagon. If I were going to do
 the swap I would cut the sedan springs down and add an aluminum spacer
 to get the correct ride height and spring rate, and get rear shocks that
 are valved properly for the increased rear weight (Bilstein will revalve
 their shocks cheaply). This would certainly be a lot cheaper and easier
 than replacing an engine- and would allow one to customize the spring
 and shock rate for the way they use their wagon. There's also a good
 chance that an aftermarket spring company somewhere makes the correct
 springs for this conversion.

 Other options that would work well are nivomat self contained leveling
 shocks, and air bags in the springs.

 I'm annoyed that people on here mostly parrot what Marshall said without
 understanding the context.

 Tyler

 Gary Hurst wrote:
 I've never heard of a suspension converted MB wagon that wasn't a
 complete disaster

 What the hell am i doing up at this hour?

 On 10/7/09, pm7...@comcast.net pm7...@comcast.net wrote:

 Marshal always gave the admonishment that any backyard attempt to convert
 the rear suspension would result in a very expensive  uncomfortable
 suspension.

 USUALLY IN CAPS


 --

 Peter Arnold

 Windsor, CT


 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


-- 
Sent from my mobile device

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-09 Thread tyler
It IS trivial to use a spring with the correct spring rate... Anyone 
that can do an engine swap, could do this much cheaper and easier.


Tyler

Peter T. Arnold wrote:
GO for it!  Redesign it. I'm sure that the effort would be trivial to 
a fellow like you.


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-09 Thread Curt Raymond
*Ahem*

I believe the term here is put up or shut up. If its so easy just take a long 
weekend at Andrew's and show us how awesome you can make his car. I'm sure he'd 
give you dinner...

-Curt

Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:48:30 -0700
From: tyler casi...@usermail.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Message-ID: 4acfbdbe.4020...@usermail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

It IS trivial to use a spring with the correct spring rate... Anyone 
that can do an engine swap, could do this much cheaper and easier.

Tyler

Peter T. Arnold wrote:
 GO for it!  Redesign it. I'm sure that the effort would be trivial to 
 a fellow like you.


  
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091009/cfb2e204/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-09 Thread Curt Raymond
Tyler,

We're not just parroting what Marshall said, we're giving you real world 
experience about a car you've apparently never been in... Why screw around 
trying to bodge something that works really really well? What Andrew is trying 
to do is go BACK to what his car had before some other bodger bodged it which I 
think is admirable.

For the record I've ridden in Volvo wagons, the older boxy (pre '91?) body 
style, they DO NOT compare to a 123 wagon.

-Curt

Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:13:22 -0700
From: tyler casi...@usermail.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Message-ID: 4acfb582.2050...@usermail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Well, were they done properly? There's no inherent reason why a wagon 
wouldn't handle fine with a regular rear suspension. I'd be willing to 
bet that most of these conversions use stock sedan springs/shocks from a 
junkyard, which aren't stiff enough for a wagon. If I were going to do 
the swap I would cut the sedan springs down and add an aluminum spacer 
to get the correct ride height and spring rate, and get rear shocks that 
are valved properly for the increased rear weight (Bilstein will revalve 
their shocks cheaply). This would certainly be a lot cheaper and easier 
than replacing an engine- and would allow one to customize the spring 
and shock rate for the way they use their wagon. There's also a good 
chance that an aftermarket spring company somewhere makes the correct 
springs for this conversion.

Other options that would work well are nivomat self contained leveling 
shocks, and air bags in the springs.

I'm annoyed that people on here mostly parrot what Marshall said without 
understanding the context.

Tyler


  
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091009/7b1f21a8/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-09 Thread tyler
The Mercedes hydraulic system is great, and I can understand wanting to 
make it work again. I'm just trying to say that a regular spring 
suspension is perfectly fine, and works great on the majority of stock 
vehicles that use them. A 300TD with sedan springs is horrible, but it's 
probably easier to raise the spring rate or install the correct springs 
than to replace the engine and reinstall all of the hydraulics. I have 
stiffened the springs on several cars by removing some spring and 
replacing it with a solid spacer- with great success. There are also a 
bunch of companies (like lesjoforsab.com and hrsprings.com) that would 
certainly sell you the correct springs, and probably provide advice on 
choosing a spring rate.


What do Volvos have to do with this? I'm a huge fan of the Volvo 
700/900/90 series wagons (1985-1998). The 80s models aren't as 
comfortable and refined as a W123- but do handle better because of a 
stiffer suspension, rack and pinion steering, and about 600lbs less 
weight. I'd love to replace my '87 740 Turbo with a 300TD (especially an 
87 300TD), but it couldn't begin to do what I do with my 740 Turbo. The 
cooling system, transmission, and suspension on the Volvo are much 
simpler and heavier duty. Just a few weeks ago I towed my 22 foot 3500lb 
sailboat up a steep windy mountain road to go sailing on an alpine lake 
that's at 7000 feet elevation. I've also taken it camping several times 
in Baja, driving for days offroad on sand and rock while loaded with 
1000lbs of gear and I've never had to do anything to the suspension 
other than stiffen the rear springs and add a locking differential. 
Somehow the Volvo has held up fine to this abuse for years and years, 
but I should eventually replace it with a 3/4 ton 4wd diesel pickup of 
some sort which is actually designed for this sort of use.


Tyler

Curt Raymond wrote:

Tyler,

We're not just parroting what Marshall said, we're giving you real world 
experience about a car you've apparently never been in... Why screw around 
trying to bodge something that works really really well? What Andrew is trying 
to do is go BACK to what his car had before some other bodger bodged it which I 
think is admirable.

For the record I've ridden in Volvo wagons, the older boxy (pre '91?) body 
style, they DO NOT compare to a 123 wagon.

-Curt

Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:13:22 -0700
From: tyler casi...@usermail.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Message-ID: 4acfb582.2050...@usermail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Well, were they done properly? There's no inherent reason why a wagon 
wouldn't handle fine with a regular rear suspension. I'd be willing to 
bet that most of these conversions use stock sedan springs/shocks from a 
junkyard, which aren't stiff enough for a wagon. If I were going to do 
the swap I would cut the sedan springs down and add an aluminum spacer 
to get the correct ride height and spring rate, and get rear shocks that 
are valved properly for the increased rear weight (Bilstein will revalve 
their shocks cheaply). This would certainly be a lot cheaper and easier 
than replacing an engine- and would allow one to customize the spring 
and shock rate for the way they use their wagon. There's also a good 
chance that an aftermarket spring company somewhere makes the correct 
springs for this conversion.


Other options that would work well are nivomat self contained leveling 
shocks, and air bags in the springs.


I'm annoyed that people on here mostly parrot what Marshall said without 
understanding the context.


Tyler


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-09 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
Or, rather than reinventing the wheel, just leave it like it was meant 
to be.  I have not seen anyone parroting anything Marshall may have 
said without knowing what they were talking about.  Have you 
owned/driven a wagon (or a LWB 126/140 etc) sedan with the properly 
working SLS?  Have you driven one that has had the hack job done?  I 
have.  Big difference.


tyler wrote:
Well, were they done properly? There's no inherent reason why a wagon 
wouldn't handle fine with a regular rear suspension. I'd be willing to 
bet that most of these conversions use stock sedan springs/shocks from 
a junkyard, which aren't stiff enough for a wagon. If I were going to 
do the swap I would cut the sedan springs down and add an aluminum 
spacer to get the correct ride height and spring rate, and get rear 
shocks that are valved properly for the increased rear weight 
(Bilstein will revalve their shocks cheaply). This would certainly be 
a lot cheaper and easier than replacing an engine- and would allow one 
to customize the spring and shock rate for the way they use their 
wagon. There's also a good chance that an aftermarket spring company 
somewhere makes the correct springs for this conversion.


Other options that would work well are nivomat self contained leveling 
shocks, and air bags in the springs.


I'm annoyed that people on here mostly parrot what Marshall said 
without understanding the context.


Tyler


--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
95 E300, 92 500SEL, 92 300SD, 92 300E 4Matic, 91 300D, 91 300E, 
89 560SEL, 87 300SDL x2, 85 380SE 5.0 Euro, 85 190D, 84 190D, 
84 300D euro manny, 81 240D, 80 240D, 76 240D, 76 300D, 
http://www.okiebenz.com

-- next part --

Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.113/2400 - Release Date: 09/28/09 05:51:00

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-09 Thread Loren Faeth
I have done quite a few engine swaps, even put a v-8 in a body made 
for 6 cyl inline ONLY.  That was an adventure.


I have worked on everything from tractors to medium duty trucks, 
houses, commercial buildings concrete, etc.


I do not presume to know more about suspension than the team of 
German-trained engineers (real engineers) that designed the 123 SLS system.


tyler, have at it, but I sincerely hope you are never coming toward 
me with your frankenheap on an Icy curve with a bump on a rainy night.



At 06:34 PM 10/9/2009, you wrote:

*Ahem*

I believe the term here is put up or shut up. If its so easy just 
take a long weekend at Andrew's and show us how awesome you can make 
his car. I'm sure he'd give you dinner...


-Curt

Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:48:30 -0700
From: tyler casi...@usermail.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Message-ID: 4acfbdbe.4020...@usermail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

It IS trivial to use a spring with the correct spring rate... Anyone
that can do an engine swap, could do this much cheaper and easier.

Tyler

Peter T. Arnold wrote:
 GO for it!  Redesign it. I'm sure that the effort would be trivial to
 a fellow like you.



-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091009/cfb2e204/attachment.html

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Loren Faeth 



___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-09 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
The problem is all of this has been tried many times before, it never 
works right.


Loren Faeth wrote:
I have done quite a few engine swaps, even put a v-8 in a body made 
for 6 cyl inline ONLY.  That was an adventure.


I have worked on everything from tractors to medium duty trucks, 
houses, commercial buildings concrete, etc.


I do not presume to know more about suspension than the team of 
German-trained engineers (real engineers) that designed the 123 SLS 
system.


tyler, have at it, but I sincerely hope you are never coming toward me 
with your frankenheap on an Icy curve with a bump on a rainy night.



At 06:34 PM 10/9/2009, you wrote:

*Ahem*

I believe the term here is put up or shut up. If its so easy just 
take a long weekend at Andrew's and show us how awesome you can make 
his car. I'm sure he'd give you dinner...


-Curt

Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:48:30 -0700
From: tyler casi...@usermail.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Message-ID: 4acfbdbe.4020...@usermail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

It IS trivial to use a spring with the correct spring rate... Anyone
that can do an engine swap, could do this much cheaper and easier.

Tyler

Peter T. Arnold wrote:
 GO for it!  Redesign it. I'm sure that the effort would be trivial to
 a fellow like you.



-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091009/cfb2e204/attachment.html 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Loren Faeth

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.113/2400 - Release Date: 09/28/09 05:51:00


  


--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
95 E300, 92 500SEL, 92 300SD, 92 300E 4Matic, 91 300D, 91 300E, 
89 560SEL, 87 300SDL x2, 85 380SE 5.0 Euro, 85 190D, 84 190D, 
84 300D euro manny, 81 240D, 80 240D, 76 240D, 76 300D, 
http://www.okiebenz.com


-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091009/67ef1c90/attachment.html
-- next part --

Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.113/2400 - Release Date: 09/28/09 05:51:00

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-09 Thread Tyler
Modifications aren't about knowing more than Mercedes or re-inventing  
the wheel- fitting a proper rate spring and damper to give you the  
handling you want isn't magic or rocket science- there are dozens of  
books about it and it's done properly on almost every car made,  
including the vast majority of W123s. The ONLY difference is that the  
wagon has more weight in the rear end and cargo capacity, requiring a  
different spring rate and dampener valve. How different? Look at the  
same engineering books as the magic mercedes engineers looked at,  
and calculate it the same way they did for the sedan. Why did they go  
to all of the extra trouble and expense of the hydraulic system then?  
Because it gives a smoother ride, and it's a good marketing gimmick-  
not because a spring is dangerous or less reliable. I for one prefer a  
stiffer ride and better handling than most car buyers, so it's  
reasonable for me to modify the suspension on my vehicles accordingly-  
and I do careful research and make conservative changes to ensure that  
the result is safe and reliable.


There's nothing wrong with modifying a vehicle to suit your needs, if  
you know what you're doing and why you're doing it. It doesn't have to  
mean that you think the origional engineers were wrong to do what they  
did, or that you know more, just that the circumstances are extremely  
different. I have had excellent luck adding and removing features, and  
making minor changes to many different brands of car to allow them to  
work properly under the conditions I use them in, which are often  
somewhat different from those they were designed for. I don't, for  
example consider the fact that I prefer to add a loud audible alarm to  
my oil pressure and coolant level sensors an assault on the competence  
of the company who decided not to include one from the factory.


Sincerely,
Tyler

On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Loren Faeth wrote:

I have done quite a few engine swaps, even put a v-8 in a body made  
for 6 cyl inline ONLY.  That was an adventure.


I have worked on everything from tractors to medium duty trucks,  
houses, commercial buildings concrete, etc.


I do not presume to know more about suspension than the team of  
German-trained engineers (real engineers) that designed the 123 SLS  
system.


tyler, have at it, but I sincerely hope you are never coming toward  
me with your frankenheap on an Icy curve with a bump on a rainy night.



At 06:34 PM 10/9/2009, you wrote:

*Ahem*

I believe the term here is put up or shut up. If its so easy just  
take a long weekend at Andrew's and show us how awesome you can  
make his car. I'm sure he'd give you dinner...


-Curt

Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:48:30 -0700
From: tyler casi...@usermail.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Message-ID: 4acfbdbe.4020...@usermail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

It IS trivial to use a spring with the correct spring rate... Anyone
that can do an engine swap, could do this much cheaper and easier.

Tyler

Peter T. Arnold wrote:
 GO for it!  Redesign it. I'm sure that the effort would be  
trivial to

 a fellow like you.



-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091009/cfb2e204/attachment.html 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Loren Faeth

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-09 Thread andrew strasfogel
PEOPLE!
I have two wagons - one with its original SLS and the other a spring/shock
conversion to go with a replacement non-300TD engine.  You are welcome to
test drive and compare.  I have done this many times, however, and while I
can state with certainty that the non-SLS 300TD is safe to drive, the
correctly suspended (?) 300TD has a more comfortable, stable suspension and
is there fore more fun to drive.



On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Tyler casi...@usermail.com wrote:

 Modifications aren't about knowing more than Mercedes or re-inventing the
 wheel- fitting a proper rate spring and damper to give you the handling you
 want isn't magic or rocket science- there are dozens of books about it and
 it's done properly on almost every car made, including the vast majority of
 W123s. The ONLY difference is that the wagon has more weight in the rear end
 and cargo capacity, requiring a different spring rate and dampener valve.
 How different? Look at the same engineering books as the magic mercedes
 engineers looked at, and calculate it the same way they did for the sedan.
 Why did they go to all of the extra trouble and expense of the hydraulic
 system then? Because it gives a smoother ride, and it's a good marketing
 gimmick- not because a spring is dangerous or less reliable. I for one
 prefer a stiffer ride and better handling than most car buyers, so it's
 reasonable for me to modify the suspension on my vehicles accordingly- and I
 do careful research and make conservative changes to ensure that the result
 is safe and reliable.

 There's nothing wrong with modifying a vehicle to suit your needs, if you
 know what you're doing and why you're doing it. It doesn't have to mean that
 you think the origional engineers were wrong to do what they did, or that
 you know more, just that the circumstances are extremely different. I have
 had excellent luck adding and removing features, and making minor changes to
 many different brands of car to allow them to work properly under the
 conditions I use them in, which are often somewhat different from those they
 were designed for. I don't, for example consider the fact that I prefer to
 add a loud audible alarm to my oil pressure and coolant level sensors an
 assault on the competence of the company who decided not to include one from
 the factory.

 Sincerely,
 Tyler


 On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Loren Faeth wrote:

  I have done quite a few engine swaps, even put a v-8 in a body made for 6
 cyl inline ONLY.  That was an adventure.

 I have worked on everything from tractors to medium duty trucks, houses,
 commercial buildings concrete, etc.

 I do not presume to know more about suspension than the team of
 German-trained engineers (real engineers) that designed the 123 SLS system.

 tyler, have at it, but I sincerely hope you are never coming toward me
 with your frankenheap on an Icy curve with a bump on a rainy night.


 At 06:34 PM 10/9/2009, you wrote:

 *Ahem*

 I believe the term here is put up or shut up. If its so easy just take
 a long weekend at Andrew's and show us how awesome you can make his car. I'm
 sure he'd give you dinner...

 -Curt

 Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:48:30 -0700
 From: tyler casi...@usermail.com
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
 To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
 Message-ID: 4acfbdbe.4020...@usermail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

 It IS trivial to use a spring with the correct spring rate... Anyone
 that can do an engine swap, could do this much cheaper and easier.

 Tyler

 Peter T. Arnold wrote:
  GO for it!  Redesign it. I'm sure that the effort would be trivial to
  a fellow like you.



 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: 
 http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091009/cfb2e204/attachment.html
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


 Loren Faeth

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091009/e77f088d/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-09 Thread David Bruckmann
There's another option that may be somewhat simpler: plumb in another 
belt-driven high-pressure pump instead of the stupid timing-chain-driven MB 
pump. 

At least some of the W124 wagons have a dual-pressure, belt-driven pump 
(124-460-15-80 Vickers) for steering/self-levelling. That could almost 
certainly be adapted to a W123...

D.

At 10:48 PM + 10/9/09, mercedes-requ...@okiebenz.com wrote:
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:13:22 -0700
From: tyler casi...@usermail.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com

Well, were they done properly? There's no inherent reason why a wagon 
wouldn't handle fine with a regular rear suspension. I'd be willing to 
bet that most of these conversions use stock sedan springs/shocks from a 
junkyard, which aren't stiff enough for a wagon. If I were going to do 
the swap I would cut the sedan springs down and add an aluminum spacer 
to get the correct ride height and spring rate, and get rear shocks that 
are valved properly for the increased rear weight (Bilstein will revalve 
their shocks cheaply). This would certainly be a lot cheaper and easier 
than replacing an engine- and would allow one to customize the spring 
and shock rate for the way they use their wagon. There's also a good 
chance that an aftermarket spring company somewhere makes the correct 
springs for this conversion.

Other options that would work well are nivomat self contained leveling 
shocks, and air bags in the springs.

I'm annoyed that people on here mostly parrot what Marshall said without 
understanding the context.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-08 Thread Curt Raymond
Have you ever actually driven an SLS equipped MB wagon? I had an '81, the car 
was basically a disaster but in those few cases where everything was working 
right it was one of the nicest cars I've ever driven. Didn't matter the weight 
in the car, the back end would figure it out. It never wallowed or had 
excessive roll and its the only car I've ever driven that I felt I could drive 
over a railroad crossing at whatever damn speed I wanted, very responsive...
I've considered many times that were I to go cross country an MB wagon would be 
the vehicle to take...

-Curt

Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:25:49 -0700
From: Tyler casi...@usermail.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Message-ID: 82983431-2ddf-4e86-b1dc-f7ac4656b...@usermail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes

Assuming you have the proper spring rate (not just sedan springs), and  
bilstein HD shocks that are valved properly for a wagon- Surely it  
would handle at least as good as a brand new self leveling system- and  
better if you made it a little stiffer (which would also eliminate the  
need for the leveling feature). I personally think the SLS is mostly a  
marketing gimmick- especially on a car that isn't designed for heavy  
duty towing. I guess it lets them get by with softer springs than they  
otherwise would need to prevent sag when loaded, which makes the ride  
softer- but certainly doesn't improve handling over a set of stiff  
regular springs.

Sincerely,
Tyler
1987 190D Turbo Biodiesel

On Oct 6, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:

 We are talking about a wagon here, correct?  Putting in regular  
 springs in a wagon makes for better handling?  I think not.  The SLS  
 when working properly handles VERY well.  It is a very simple  
 system, very little goes wrong.  That think will never be right if  
 you just put springs in it.

 tyler wrote:
 It sounds like a lot of work and expense to reinstall the self  
 levelling system- I'd just keep the regular rear suspension myself.  
 Simpler, more reliable, and better handling. If it sags in the rear  
 when you load it up, just get stiffer springs or some spacers. I've  
 used overload springs with stock height, but a 20% stiffer rate  
 on my Volvo wagons that I do a lot of towing with. It handles a  
 little better, and doesn't really sag at all when I load it up- but  
 I didn't notice any reduction in the ride quality.

 Tyler


  
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091008/5f8dca5f/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-08 Thread Loren Faeth

Agreed.

We had an 84 TE, an 85 TD, 88 TE and the 87 TD.  They are 
wonderful.  I would love to have SLS in the 300SDLs.  Maybe I should 
salvage all the SLS parts from the TD and figure out a way to put 
them on the SDL.   I had to put almost everything to do with the SLS 
new on the 88TE.  The ride is worth it.


I hope some year that the powers at MBNA will deem us worthy to have 
a Diesel wagon again SOME YEAR!!!  It has been 23 years!  Anyone at 
MBNA listening


ok, I didn't think so.



At 06:45 PM 10/8/2009, you wrote:
Have you ever actually driven an SLS equipped MB wagon? I had an 
'81, the car was basically a disaster but in those few cases where 
everything was working right it was one of the nicest cars I've ever 
driven. Didn't matter the weight in the car, the back end would 
figure it out. It never wallowed or had excessive roll and its the 
only car I've ever driven that I felt I could drive over a railroad 
crossing at whatever damn speed I wanted, very responsive...
I've considered many times that were I to go cross country an MB 
wagon would be the vehicle to take...


-Curt

Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:25:49 -0700
From: Tyler casi...@usermail.com
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Message-ID: 82983431-2ddf-4e86-b1dc-f7ac4656b...@usermail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes

Assuming you have the proper spring rate (not just sedan springs), and
bilstein HD shocks that are valved properly for a wagon- Surely it
would handle at least as good as a brand new self leveling system- and
better if you made it a little stiffer (which would also eliminate the
need for the leveling feature). I personally think the SLS is mostly a
marketing gimmick- especially on a car that isn't designed for heavy
duty towing. I guess it lets them get by with softer springs than they
otherwise would need to prevent sag when loaded, which makes the ride
softer- but certainly doesn't improve handling over a set of stiff
regular springs.

Sincerely,
Tyler
1987 190D Turbo Biodiesel

On Oct 6, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:

 We are talking about a wagon here, correct?  Putting in regular
 springs in a wagon makes for better handling?  I think not.  The SLS
 when working properly handles VERY well.  It is a very simple
 system, very little goes wrong.  That think will never be right if
 you just put springs in it.

 tyler wrote:
 It sounds like a lot of work and expense to reinstall the self
 levelling system- I'd just keep the regular rear suspension myself.
 Simpler, more reliable, and better handling. If it sags in the rear
 when you load it up, just get stiffer springs or some spacers. I've
 used overload springs with stock height, but a 20% stiffer rate
 on my Volvo wagons that I do a lot of towing with. It handles a
 little better, and doesn't really sag at all when I load it up- but
 I didn't notice any reduction in the ride quality.

 Tyler



-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091008/5f8dca5f/attachment.html

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Loren Faeth 



___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-08 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
I cant believe they never came out with a 2.5 turbo wagon, or the later 
606 wagon, or a 606 turbo wagon in the 210


Loren Faeth wrote:

Agreed.

We had an 84 TE, an 85 TD, 88 TE and the 87 TD.  They are wonderful.  
I would love to have SLS in the 300SDLs.  Maybe I should salvage all 
the SLS parts from the TD and figure out a way to put them on the 
SDL.   I had to put almost everything to do with the SLS new on the 
88TE.  The ride is worth it.


I hope some year that the powers at MBNA will deem us worthy to have a 
Diesel wagon again SOME YEAR!!!  It has been 23 years!  Anyone at MBNA 
listening


ok, I didn't think so.





--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
95 E300, 92 500SEL, 92 300SD, 92 300E 4Matic, 91 300D, 91 300E, 
89 560SEL, 87 300SDL x2, 85 380SE 5.0 Euro, 85 190D, 84 190D, 
84 300D euro manny, 81 240D, 80 240D, 76 240D, 76 300D, 
http://www.okiebenz.com



___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-08 Thread Loren Faeth
They DID!  they are ALL OVER the REST of the world!   MBNA has deemed 
that we don't want them here.


At 09:56 PM 10/8/2009, you wrote:
I cant believe they never came out with a 2.5 turbo wagon, or the 
later 606 wagon, or a 606 turbo wagon in the 210


Loren Faeth wrote:

Agreed.

We had an 84 TE, an 85 TD, 88 TE and the 87 TD.  They are wonderful.
I would love to have SLS in the 300SDLs.  Maybe I should salvage 
all the SLS parts from the TD and figure out a way to put them on 
the SDL.   I had to put almost everything to do with the SLS new on 
the 88TE.  The ride is worth it.


I hope some year that the powers at MBNA will deem us worthy to 
have a Diesel wagon again SOME YEAR!!!  It has been 23 
years!  Anyone at MBNA listening


ok, I didn't think so.




--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
95 E300, 92 500SEL, 92 300SD, 92 300E 4Matic, 91 300D, 91 300E, 89 
560SEL, 87 300SDL x2, 85 380SE 5.0 Euro, 85 190D, 84 190D, 84 300D 
euro manny, 81 240D, 80 240D, 76 240D, 76 300D, http://www.okiebenz.com



___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Loren Faeth 



___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-07 Thread Tyler
Assuming you have the proper spring rate (not just sedan springs), and  
bilstein HD shocks that are valved properly for a wagon- Surely it  
would handle at least as good as a brand new self leveling system- and  
better if you made it a little stiffer (which would also eliminate the  
need for the leveling feature). I personally think the SLS is mostly a  
marketing gimmick- especially on a car that isn't designed for heavy  
duty towing. I guess it lets them get by with softer springs than they  
otherwise would need to prevent sag when loaded, which makes the ride  
softer- but certainly doesn't improve handling over a set of stiff  
regular springs.


Sincerely,
Tyler
1987 190D Turbo Biodiesel

On Oct 6, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:

We are talking about a wagon here, correct?  Putting in regular  
springs in a wagon makes for better handling?  I think not.  The SLS  
when working properly handles VERY well.  It is a very simple  
system, very little goes wrong.  That think will never be right if  
you just put springs in it.


tyler wrote:
It sounds like a lot of work and expense to reinstall the self  
levelling system- I'd just keep the regular rear suspension myself.  
Simpler, more reliable, and better handling. If it sags in the rear  
when you load it up, just get stiffer springs or some spacers. I've  
used overload springs with stock height, but a 20% stiffer rate  
on my Volvo wagons that I do a lot of towing with. It handles a  
little better, and doesn't really sag at all when I load it up- but  
I didn't notice any reduction in the ride quality.


Tyler


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-07 Thread Dillon, Meade M CIV SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 53310
Do you have such a bastardized car?  Almost every such car I've heard of
was judged to be a very poor handling car compared to the original SLS.

Max

-Original Message-
From: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com
[mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of Tyler
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 3:26 AM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

Assuming you have the proper spring rate (not just sedan springs), and
bilstein HD shocks that are valved properly for a wagon- Surely it would
handle at least as good as a brand new self leveling system- and better
if you made it a little stiffer (which would also eliminate the need for
the leveling feature). I personally think the SLS is mostly a marketing
gimmick- especially on a car that isn't designed for heavy duty towing.
I guess it lets them get by with softer springs than they otherwise
would need to prevent sag when loaded, which makes the ride
softer- but certainly doesn't improve handling over a set of stiff
regular springs.

Sincerely,
Tyler
1987 190D Turbo Biodiesel

On Oct 6, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:

 We are talking about a wagon here, correct?  Putting in regular 
 springs in a wagon makes for better handling?  I think not.  The SLS 
 when working properly handles VERY well.  It is a very simple system, 
 very little goes wrong.  That think will never be right if you just 
 put springs in it.

 tyler wrote:
 It sounds like a lot of work and expense to reinstall the self 
 levelling system- I'd just keep the regular rear suspension myself.
 Simpler, more reliable, and better handling. If it sags in the rear 
 when you load it up, just get stiffer springs or some spacers. I've 
 used overload springs with stock height, but a 20% stiffer rate on 
 my Volvo wagons that I do a lot of towing with. It handles a little 
 better, and doesn't really sag at all when I load it up- but I didn't

 notice any reduction in the ride quality.

 Tyler

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives
http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-07 Thread pm7088
Marshal always gave the admonishment that any backyard attempt to convert the 
rear suspension would result in a very expensive  uncomfortable suspension. 

USUALLY IN CAPS 


-- 

Peter Arnold 

Windsor, CT 

- Original Message - 
From: Meade M CIV SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC Dillon, 53310 
meade.m.dil...@navy.mil 
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com 
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 6:57:52 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor 

Do you have such a bastardized car? Almost every such car I've heard of 
was judged to be a very poor handling car compared to the original SLS. 

Max 

-Original Message- 
From: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com 
[mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of Tyler 
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 3:26 AM 
To: Mercedes Discussion List 
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor 

Assuming you have the proper spring rate (not just sedan springs), and 
bilstein HD shocks that are valved properly for a wagon- Surely it would 
handle at least as good as a brand new self leveling system- and better 
if you made it a little stiffer (which would also eliminate the need for 
the leveling feature). I personally think the SLS is mostly a marketing 
gimmick- especially on a car that isn't designed for heavy duty towing. 
I guess it lets them get by with softer springs than they otherwise 
would need to prevent sag when loaded, which makes the ride 
softer- but certainly doesn't improve handling over a set of stiff 
regular springs. 

Sincerely, 
Tyler 
1987 190D Turbo Biodiesel 

On Oct 6, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin wrote: 

 We are talking about a wagon here, correct? Putting in regular 
 springs in a wagon makes for better handling? I think not. The SLS 
 when working properly handles VERY well. It is a very simple system, 
 very little goes wrong. That think will never be right if you just 
 put springs in it. 
 
 tyler wrote: 
 It sounds like a lot of work and expense to reinstall the self 
 levelling system- I'd just keep the regular rear suspension myself. 
 Simpler, more reliable, and better handling. If it sags in the rear 
 when you load it up, just get stiffer springs or some spacers. I've 
 used overload springs with stock height, but a 20% stiffer rate on 
 my Volvo wagons that I do a lot of towing with. It handles a little 
 better, and doesn't really sag at all when I load it up- but I didn't 

 notice any reduction in the ride quality. 
 
 Tyler 

___ 
http://www.okiebenz.com 
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives 
http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ 

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: 
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com 

___ 
http://www.okiebenz.com 
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com 
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ 

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: 
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com 
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091007/7cf0a594/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-07 Thread Dillon, Meade M CIV SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 53310
Rich, have you contacted this guy yet?  I've sent him an email but no
response yet.

Max 

-Original Message-
From: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com
[mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of Rich Thomas
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 8:11 AM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

http://charleston.craigslist.org/cto/1406417804.html

Solid construction, incomparable fit and finish, constructed of high
grade materials, it does not show the signs of aging that would be
expected in a 25-year-old car. There is no shimmy or shake in the body,
no out of character vibrations, and absolutely no rattles or squeaks
from the interior. the Engine is bad . The interior and exterior finish
is factory original in very good condition, no rust at all underneath.

This car has been maintained regularly. We have replaced the alternator,
starter, glow plugs fuel pump and brake pads. New battery on 2008. Less
than 8,000 miles on all four tires. We have all maintenance and repair
records less then 8000 on new transmission. Needs a motor. antenna
motor. All other power options and accesories are in working condition. 
It has been having an intermittent problem with fuel injection.

Driving and riding in this car is an exceptionally pleasurable
experience. It averages 25-30 MPG. With a little TLC, you will enjoy
many miles of happy motoring!


-R

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives
http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-07 Thread Rich Thomas
Uh, no.  I have one foot in the grave already, if I even contacted 
someone about another old Benz I would be summarily executed and covered 
up, with no words said over my mortal remains.


--R

Dillon, Meade M CIV SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 53310 wrote:

Rich, have you contacted this guy yet?  I've sent him an email but no
response yet.

Max 


-Original Message-
From: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com
[mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of Rich Thomas
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 8:11 AM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

http://charleston.craigslist.org/cto/1406417804.html

Solid construction, incomparable fit and finish, constructed of high
grade materials, it does not show the signs of aging that would be
expected in a 25-year-old car. There is no shimmy or shake in the body,
no out of character vibrations, and absolutely no rattles or squeaks
from the interior. the Engine is bad . The interior and exterior finish
is factory original in very good condition, no rust at all underneath.

This car has been maintained regularly. We have replaced the alternator,
starter, glow plugs fuel pump and brake pads. New battery on 2008. Less
than 8,000 miles on all four tires. We have all maintenance and repair
records less then 8000 on new transmission. Needs a motor. antenna
motor. All other power options and accesories are in working condition. 
It has been having an intermittent problem with fuel injection.


Driving and riding in this car is an exceptionally pleasurable
experience. It averages 25-30 MPG. With a little TLC, you will enjoy
many miles of happy motoring!


-R

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives
http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

  


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-07 Thread andrew strasfogel
So Rich, do we have a deal yet?  Should I have my girl call your girl?

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Rich Thomas 
richthomas79td...@constructivity.net wrote:

 Uh, no.  I have one foot in the grave already, if I even contacted someone
 about another old Benz I would be summarily executed and covered up, with no
 words said over my mortal remains.

 --R


 Dillon, Meade M CIV SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 53310 wrote:

 Rich, have you contacted this guy yet?  I've sent him an email but no
 response yet.

 Max
 -Original Message-
 From: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com
 [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of Rich Thomas
 Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 8:11 AM
 To: Mercedes Discussion List
 Subject: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

 http://charleston.craigslist.org/cto/1406417804.html

 Solid construction, incomparable fit and finish, constructed of high
 grade materials, it does not show the signs of aging that would be
 expected in a 25-year-old car. There is no shimmy or shake in the body,
 no out of character vibrations, and absolutely no rattles or squeaks
 from the interior. the Engine is bad . The interior and exterior finish
 is factory original in very good condition, no rust at all underneath.

 This car has been maintained regularly. We have replaced the alternator,
 starter, glow plugs fuel pump and brake pads. New battery on 2008. Less
 than 8,000 miles on all four tires. We have all maintenance and repair
 records less then 8000 on new transmission. Needs a motor. antenna
 motor. All other power options and accesories are in working condition. It
 has been having an intermittent problem with fuel injection.

 Driving and riding in this car is an exceptionally pleasurable
 experience. It averages 25-30 MPG. With a little TLC, you will enjoy
 many miles of happy motoring!


 -R

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives
 http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com




 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091007/f3facdb0/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-07 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin

exactly.

Dillon, Meade M CIV SPAWARSYSCEN-ATLANTIC, 53310 wrote:

Do you have such a bastardized car?  Almost every such car I've heard of
was judged to be a very poor handling car compared to the original SLS.

Max

-Original Message-
From: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com
[mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of Tyler
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 3:26 AM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

Assuming you have the proper spring rate (not just sedan springs), and
bilstein HD shocks that are valved properly for a wagon- Surely it would
handle at least as good as a brand new self leveling system- and better
if you made it a little stiffer (which would also eliminate the need for
the leveling feature). I personally think the SLS is mostly a marketing
gimmick- especially on a car that isn't designed for heavy duty towing.
I guess it lets them get by with softer springs than they otherwise
would need to prevent sag when loaded, which makes the ride
softer- but certainly doesn't improve handling over a set of stiff
regular springs.

Sincerely,
Tyler
1987 190D Turbo Biodiesel

On Oct 6, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:

  
We are talking about a wagon here, correct?  Putting in regular 
springs in a wagon makes for better handling?  I think not.  The SLS 
when working properly handles VERY well.  It is a very simple system, 
very little goes wrong.  That think will never be right if you just 
put springs in it.


tyler wrote:

It sounds like a lot of work and expense to reinstall the self 
levelling system- I'd just keep the regular rear suspension myself.
Simpler, more reliable, and better handling. If it sags in the rear 
when you load it up, just get stiffer springs or some spacers. I've 
used overload springs with stock height, but a 20% stiffer rate on 
my Volvo wagons that I do a lot of towing with. It handles a little 
better, and doesn't really sag at all when I load it up- but I didn't
  


  

notice any reduction in the ride quality.

Tyler
  


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives
http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

  


--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
95 E300, 92 500SEL, 92 300SD, 92 300E 4Matic, 91 300D, 91 300E, 
89 560SEL, 87 300SDL x2, 85 380SE 5.0 Euro, 85 190D, 84 190D, 
84 300D euro manny, 81 240D, 80 240D, 76 240D, 76 300D, 
http://www.okiebenz.com


-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091007/9f2136ef/attachment.html
-- next part --

Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.113/2400 - Release Date: 09/28/09 05:51:00

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-06 Thread andrew strasfogel
Yep.

BTW, I still have a running 1985 300D motor for sale FREE.  The motor is
in a running, driving 300TD.  All you pay for is the removal cost (at an
indy mechanic of my choosing in Rockville, MD).  Happy motoring!

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Dwight E. Giles, Jr degco...@cox.netwrote:

 Happy Motoring'-Wasn't that the old Esso ad?
 I date myself.

 Dwight E. Giles, Jr.
 1978 240D 4 speed. 218K + miles.
 1990 300D 2.5t 170K miles.
 Wickford, RI

 -Original Message-
 From: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com]
 On Behalf Of Bob Rentfro
 Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:15 PM
 To: Mercedes Discussion List
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

 Anyone who describes a car as able to give you happy motoring isn't
 hooked
 up right.
 Never have I thought, I'd really like to motor today...I long for an
 automobile that would afford me happy motoring...

 Bob R




  ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091006/657f3474/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-06 Thread Rich Thomas

So if I came by with my engine hoist could I become your indy of choice?

--R

andrew strasfogel wrote:

Yep.

BTW, I still have a running 1985 300D motor for sale FREE.  The motor is
in a running, driving 300TD.  All you pay for is the removal cost (at an
indy mechanic of my choosing in Rockville, MD).  Happy motoring!

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Dwight E. Giles, Jr degco...@cox.netwrote:

  

Happy Motoring'-Wasn't that the old Esso ad?
I date myself.

Dwight E. Giles, Jr.
1978 240D 4 speed. 218K + miles.
1990 300D 2.5t 170K miles.
Wickford, RI

-Original Message-
From: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com]
On Behalf Of Bob Rentfro
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:15 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

Anyone who describes a car as able to give you happy motoring isn't
hooked
up right.
Never have I thought, I'd really like to motor today...I long for an
automobile that would afford me happy motoring...

Bob R




 ___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091006/657f3474/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

  

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091006/2013b707/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-06 Thread andrew strasfogel
Yes, provided you also hooked up my replacement engine.

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Rich Thomas 
richthomas79td...@constructivity.net wrote:

 So if I came by with my engine hoist could I become your indy of choice?

 --R

 andrew strasfogel wrote:

  Yep.

 BTW, I still have a running 1985 300D motor for sale FREE.  The motor is
 in a running, driving 300TD.  All you pay for is the removal cost (at an
 indy mechanic of my choosing in Rockville, MD).  Happy motoring!

 On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Dwight E. Giles, Jr degco...@cox.net
 wrote:



 Happy Motoring'-Wasn't that the old Esso ad?
 I date myself.

 Dwight E. Giles, Jr.
 1978 240D 4 speed. 218K + miles.
 1990 300D 2.5t 170K miles.
 Wickford, RI

 -Original Message-
 From: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com [mailto:
 mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com]
 On Behalf Of Bob Rentfro
 Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:15 PM
 To: Mercedes Discussion List
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

 Anyone who describes a car as able to give you happy motoring isn't
 hooked
 up right.
 Never have I thought, I'd really like to motor today...I long for an
 automobile that would afford me happy motoring...

 Bob R




  ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: 
 http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091006/657f3474/attachment.html

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: 
 http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091006/2013b707/attachment.html


 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091006/4efd0f4b/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-06 Thread Rich Thomas

Hook it up to what?

--R

andrew strasfogel wrote:

Yes, provided you also hooked up my replacement engine.

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Rich Thomas 
richthomas79td...@constructivity.net wrote:

  

So if I came by with my engine hoist could I become your indy of choice?

--R

andrew strasfogel wrote:



 Yep.

BTW, I still have a running 1985 300D motor for sale FREE.  The motor is
in a running, driving 300TD.  All you pay for is the removal cost (at an
indy mechanic of my choosing in Rockville, MD).  Happy motoring!

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Dwight E. Giles, Jr degco...@cox.net
  

wrote:





___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-06 Thread andrew strasfogel
I am hoping to find a 300TD (wagon) motor to install so I can reconnect the
self levelling system (SLS) on my wagon.  Currently, the car is fitted with
a perfectly adequate replacement 300D replacement engine from a non wagon.
The PO disconnected the SLS (removed the hydraulic struts) and installed
normal Bilstein shocks when he installed the current motor (which of course
has no SLS pump).  Idiot.

Do you really need a turbodiesel engine, or are you messing with me?

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Rich Thomas 
richthomas79td...@constructivity.net wrote:

 Hook it up to what?

 --R

 andrew strasfogel wrote:

 Yes, provided you also hooked up my replacement engine.

 On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Rich Thomas 
 richthomas79td...@constructivity.net wrote:



 So if I came by with my engine hoist could I become your indy of choice?

 --R

 andrew strasfogel wrote:



  Yep.

 BTW, I still have a running 1985 300D motor for sale FREE.  The motor
 is
 in a running, driving 300TD.  All you pay for is the removal cost (at an
 indy mechanic of my choosing in Rockville, MD).  Happy motoring!

 On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Dwight E. Giles, Jr degco...@cox.net


 wrote:




  ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091006/2369eebf/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-06 Thread Rich Thomas

yes

--R

andrew strasfogel wrote:


Do you really need a turbodiesel engine, or are you messing with me?

  



___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-06 Thread andrew strasfogel
Haha. If you mess around with me I will donate my engine to someone else.

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Rich Thomas 
richthomas79td...@constructivity.net wrote:

 yes

 --R

 andrew strasfogel wrote:


 Do you really need a turbodiesel engine, or are you messing with me?




  ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091006/e62d361b/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-06 Thread tyler
It sounds like a lot of work and expense to reinstall the self levelling 
system- I'd just keep the regular rear suspension myself. Simpler, more 
reliable, and better handling. If it sags in the rear when you load it 
up, just get stiffer springs or some spacers. I've used overload 
springs with stock height, but a 20% stiffer rate on my Volvo wagons 
that I do a lot of towing with. It handles a little better, and doesn't 
really sag at all when I load it up- but I didn't notice any reduction 
in the ride quality.


Tyler

andrew strasfogel wrote:

I am hoping to find a 300TD (wagon) motor to install so I can reconnect the
self levelling system (SLS) on my wagon.  Currently, the car is fitted with
a perfectly adequate replacement 300D replacement engine from a non wagon.
The PO disconnected the SLS (removed the hydraulic struts) and installed
normal Bilstein shocks when he installed the current motor (which of course
has no SLS pump).  Idiot.

Do you really need a turbodiesel engine, or are you messing with me?


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-06 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
We are talking about a wagon here, correct?  Putting in regular springs 
in a wagon makes for better handling?  I think not.  The SLS when 
working properly handles VERY well.  It is a very simple system, very 
little goes wrong.  That think will never be right if you just put 
springs in it.


tyler wrote:
It sounds like a lot of work and expense to reinstall the self 
levelling system- I'd just keep the regular rear suspension myself. 
Simpler, more reliable, and better handling. If it sags in the rear 
when you load it up, just get stiffer springs or some spacers. I've 
used overload springs with stock height, but a 20% stiffer rate on 
my Volvo wagons that I do a lot of towing with. It handles a little 
better, and doesn't really sag at all when I load it up- but I didn't 
notice any reduction in the ride quality.


Tyler

andrew strasfogel wrote:
I am hoping to find a 300TD (wagon) motor to install so I can 
reconnect the
self levelling system (SLS) on my wagon.  Currently, the car is 
fitted with
a perfectly adequate replacement 300D replacement engine from a non 
wagon.

The PO disconnected the SLS (removed the hydraulic struts) and installed
normal Bilstein shocks when he installed the current motor (which of 
course

has no SLS pump).  Idiot.

Do you really need a turbodiesel engine, or are you messing with me?


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
95 E300, 92 500SEL, 92 300SD, 92 300E 4Matic, 91 300D, 91 300E, 
89 560SEL, 87 300SDL x2, 85 380SE 5.0 Euro, 85 190D, 84 190D, 
84 300D euro manny, 81 240D, 80 240D, 76 240D, 76 300D, 
http://www.okiebenz.com

-- next part --

Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.113/2400 - Release Date: 09/28/09 05:51:00

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


[MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-05 Thread Rich Thomas

http://charleston.craigslist.org/cto/1406417804.html

Solid construction, incomparable fit and finish, constructed of high 
grade materials, it does not show the signs of aging that would be 
expected in a 25-year-old car. There is no shimmy or shake in the body, 
no out of character vibrations, and absolutely no rattles or squeaks 
from the interior. the Engine is bad . The interior and exterior finish 
is factory original in very good condition, no rust at all underneath.


This car has been maintained regularly. We have replaced the alternator, 
starter, glow plugs fuel pump and brake pads. New battery on 2008. Less 
than 8,000 miles on all four tires. We have all maintenance and repair 
records less then 8000 on new transmission. Needs a motor. antenna 
motor. All other power options and accesories are in working condition. 
It has been having an intermittent problem with fuel injection.


Driving and riding in this car is an exceptionally pleasurable 
experience. It averages 25-30 MPG. With a little TLC, you will enjoy 
many miles of happy motoring!



-R

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-05 Thread andrew strasfogel
Maybe *just* an antenna motor!

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Rich Thomas 
richthomas79td...@constructivity.net wrote:

 http://charleston.craigslist.org/cto/1406417804.html

 Solid construction, incomparable fit and finish, constructed of high grade
 materials, it does not show the signs of aging that would be expected in a
 25-year-old car. There is no shimmy or shake in the body, no out of
 character vibrations, and absolutely no rattles or squeaks from the
 interior. the Engine is bad . The interior and exterior finish is factory
 original in very good condition, no rust at all underneath.

 This car has been maintained regularly. We have replaced the alternator,
 starter, glow plugs fuel pump and brake pads. New battery on 2008. Less than
 8,000 miles on all four tires. We have all maintenance and repair records
 less then 8000 on new transmission. Needs a motor. antenna motor. All other
 power options and accesories are in working condition. It has been having an
 intermittent problem with fuel injection.

 Driving and riding in this car is an exceptionally pleasurable experience.
 It averages 25-30 MPG. With a little TLC, you will enjoy many miles of happy
 motoring!


 -R

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091005/3b440a3e/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-05 Thread Bob Rentfro
Anyone who describes a car as able to give you happy motoring isn't hooked
up right.
Never have I thought, I'd really like to motor today...I long for an
automobile that would afford me happy motoring...

Bob R



On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 2:04 PM, andrew strasfogel astrasfo...@gmail.comwrote:

 Maybe *just* an antenna motor!

 On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Rich Thomas 
 richthomas79td...@constructivity.net wrote:

  http://charleston.craigslist.org/cto/1406417804.html
 
  Solid construction, incomparable fit and finish, constructed of high
 grade
  materials, it does not show the signs of aging that would be expected in
 a
  25-year-old car. There is no shimmy or shake in the body, no out of
  character vibrations, and absolutely no rattles or squeaks from the
  interior. the Engine is bad . The interior and exterior finish is factory
  original in very good condition, no rust at all underneath.
 
  This car has been maintained regularly. We have replaced the alternator,
  starter, glow plugs fuel pump and brake pads. New battery on 2008. Less
 than
  8,000 miles on all four tires. We have all maintenance and repair records
  less then 8000 on new transmission. Needs a motor. antenna motor. All
 other
  power options and accesories are in working condition. It has been having
 an
  intermittent problem with fuel injection.
 
  Driving and riding in this car is an exceptionally pleasurable
 experience.
  It averages 25-30 MPG. With a little TLC, you will enjoy many miles of
 happy
  motoring!
 
 
  -R
 
  ___
  http://www.okiebenz.com
  For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
  To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
  To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
  http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: 
 http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091005/3b440a3e/attachment.html
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20091005/f76f9844/attachment.html
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

2009-10-05 Thread Dwight E. Giles, Jr
Happy Motoring'-Wasn't that the old Esso ad?
I date myself.

Dwight E. Giles, Jr.
1978 240D 4 speed. 218K + miles.  
1990 300D 2.5t 170K miles.
Wickford, RI

-Original Message-
From: mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com]
On Behalf Of Bob Rentfro
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:15 PM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Great car but it needs a motor

Anyone who describes a car as able to give you happy motoring isn't hooked
up right.
Never have I thought, I'd really like to motor today...I long for an
automobile that would afford me happy motoring...

Bob R




___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com