Well I think there is plenty of info to say the original question has been answered. Far as the you beaut MB V6 goes, the new Toyota quad cam V6 is much the same. 200kw/268hp 10L/100K's or 23.5mpg although it is a 3.5 litre and the MB V6 3.5 also puts out 200kw but uses a little bit less fuel. Although we dn't get the 3 or 3.5litre over here but only the 2.2 and 2.8 and a Diesel.
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <mercedes@okiebenz.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 11:53 AM Subject: Re: [MBZ] Hendrik never gives up > about 1mpg less. The M112 C320 hovered around 19-20mpg and the '08 C300 > does > 19mpg. Which is damned good considering it's weight and horsepower, 228. > > My opinion of which six is based on which compnents are likely to fail > earlier than the other and what has been engineered out and I maintain the > M104 is > better. Not as good as the V-6s, you undersatnd. > > RLE _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
