I think that most of the people that are serious about cars would not be affected much by photography issues. In fact, lush photos sort of make me suspicious.
With houses, and with women car buyers, I think photography may be a bigger issue? brian On 5/22/07, Curt Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You got that right Glenn. When we were looking last year I found that you couldn't tell ANYTHING about a house from the pictures. Because of which we ended up looking at 3x as many houses as otherwise because I knew the pictures told me nothing... -Curt Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 09:31:18 -0400 From: "Glenn Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [MBZ] Drool . . . WOW! What a nice car! To: mercedes@okiebenz.com Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Regarding the Utah 300D you guys have been conversing about, I agree it's an extremely nice example but my contribution to the topic has to do with the fact that the owner/whoever took the time, etc. to take decent photographs and should help immensely in the sale of the car. The reason I'm pointing this out is that, while I've been waiting for my house to sell, I've been perusing the I-net for houses in the area where I intend to move and I'm astounded at the lousy photography which many realtors apparently deem acceptable to entice prospective buyers. G. M. Brown Rochester, NY --------------------------------- Need Mail bonding? Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users. _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
