So, how secure is that gun in the holster?
How easy might it be for someone to come up behind you and take the gun
from you?
That is what would concern me as much as anything.
If some nut case takes your gun, you may just be the first one to get shot.
RB
On 10/09/2014 7:30 AM, Mitch Haley
Typically the Blackhawk line of holsters have a catch positioned so it can
be quickly released if needed by the wearer, but are very awkward for
anyone else to be able to reach while also trying to draw the pistol out of
the holster. These are the same holsters that uniformed police and
military
The nut case is the guy displaying a gun in public. The criminal is
probably smart enough to disarm the nut case.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Meade Dillon via Mercedes
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:
Typically the Blackhawk line of holsters have a catch positioned so it can
be quickly
Speaking only for myself, training first in military, later as a Deputy,
weapon retention is primary. It is a multi part process starting with
holster selection and then with situational awareness at all times, armed
or not. That rigorous training is refreshed often and by acceptance of
daily
And that observation is based on what fact?
The documented number of times a criminal has attacked when a gun was
present with the intended victim? That begs substance please.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:
The nut case is the guy
Meade Dillon via Mercedes wrote:
Typically the Blackhawk line of holsters have a catch positioned so it can
be quickly released if needed by the wearer, but are very awkward for
anyone else to be able to reach while also trying to draw the pistol out of
the holster. These are the same holsters
G Mann via Mercedes wrote:
And that observation is based on what fact?
The fact that Andrew is of the privileged Progressive type that gets to make up
their facts on the fly, and evil Conservatives aren't allowed to dispute them.
Mitch.
___
Let's not get personal, please. You don't know me at all.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Mitch Haley via Mercedes
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:
G Mann via Mercedes wrote:
And that observation is based on what fact?
The fact that Andrew is of the privileged Progressive type that gets to
Andrew wrote:
Let's not get personal, please. You don't know me at all.
Das' Kool!!
You keep the mystery about who you are.
The rest of us?
For the most part, we are open book.
Again, Das' Kool!!
mao
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives
-
From: Mercedes [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of
Mountain Man via Mercedes
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 7:27 PM
To: Andrew Strasfogel; Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] N and guns
Andrew wrote:
Let's not get personal, please. You don't know me at all
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:50:24 -0400 Scott Ritchey via Mercedes
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:
Then he started charging them with federal firearms violations. The
Federal court dates were soon and proof of the crime was (relatively)
easy. As I recall, 19 perps went away for 5-10 years each, that
11 matches
Mail list logo