Re: [MBZ] On the Subject of Early MB Slushbox Shifters...

2021-03-07 Thread OK Don via Mercedes
"Speed shifting" is how they explained it.

On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 6:38 PM Mitch Haley via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:

> On 2021-03-07 18:15, OK Don via Mercedes wrote:
> > Back when I was working in a foreign car shop in college, we frequently
> > replaced transmissions in spritgets (AH Sprite, MG Midget) due to
> > reverse
> > being to the right of 4th gear - shifting from third to reverse and
> > letting
> > the clutch out threw the idler gear out the side of the case.
>
> How in the world do you engage a non-synchronized reverse at 30mph?
> Must have been yanking that lever with all their might.
>
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
>
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>
>

-- 
OK Don

"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to
pause and reflect." Mark Twain

“Basic research is what I’m doing when I don’t know what I am doing.”  Wernher
Von Braun
2013 F150, 18 mpg
2017 Subaru Legacy, 30 mpg
1957 C182A, 12 mpg - but at 150 mph!
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] On the Subject of Early MB Slushbox Shifters...

2021-03-07 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes

On 2021-03-07 18:15, OK Don via Mercedes wrote:

Back when I was working in a foreign car shop in college, we frequently
replaced transmissions in spritgets (AH Sprite, MG Midget) due to 
reverse
being to the right of 4th gear - shifting from third to reverse and 
letting

the clutch out threw the idler gear out the side of the case.


How in the world do you engage a non-synchronized reverse at 30mph?
Must have been yanking that lever with all their might.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] On the Subject of Early MB Slushbox Shifters...

2021-03-07 Thread OK Don via Mercedes
Back when I was working in a foreign car shop in college, we frequently
replaced transmissions in spritgets (AH Sprite, MG Midget) due to reverse
being to the right of 4th gear - shifting from third to reverse and letting
the clutch out threw the idler gear out the side of the case.

On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 4:20 PM Allan Streib via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:

> Reverse on manuals doesn't seem to be standard. I've seen it top-left,
> bottom left, or bottom right at least.
>
> Anyone remember the Top Gear where James was driving a (I think) 190E
> 2.3-16 that had the dogleg 1st gear? He kept putting it in Reverse to
> start off from a stop (though I'm sure that was contrived for the show
> for comedic effect).
>
> Allan
>


-- 
OK Don

"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to
pause and reflect." Mark Twain

“Basic research is what I’m doing when I don’t know what I am doing.”  Wernher
Von Braun
2013 F150, 18 mpg
2017 Subaru Legacy, 30 mpg
1957 C182A, 12 mpg - but at 150 mph!
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] On the Subject of Early MB Slushbox Shifters...

2021-03-07 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes

On 2021-03-07 17:17, Allan Streib via Mercedes wrote:

Reverse on manuals doesn't seem to be standard. I've seen it top-left,
bottom left, or bottom right at least.

Anyone remember the Top Gear where James was driving a (I think) 190E
2.3-16 that had the dogleg 1st gear? He kept putting it in Reverse to
start off from a stop (though I'm sure that was contrived for the show
for comedic effect).



The Getrag in the 2.3-16 is the only MBZ I know of with up for reverse.
Amongst farm tractors, it's known as 'shuttle shift' when first and 
reverse are in a straight line. Great for barn and pasture work.


On the 16V, you only need first gear for a standing start, the rest of 
the race you're exclusively using the other four gears.


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] On the Subject of Early MB Slushbox Shifters...

2021-03-07 Thread Allan Streib via Mercedes
Reverse on manuals doesn't seem to be standard. I've seen it top-left,
bottom left, or bottom right at least.

Anyone remember the Top Gear where James was driving a (I think) 190E
2.3-16 that had the dogleg 1st gear? He kept putting it in Reverse to
start off from a stop (though I'm sure that was contrived for the show
for comedic effect).

Allan

Rick Knoble via Mercedes  writes:

>> The shifter design was later standardized for all vehicles sold in the US to 
>> avoid this.
>
> Yep. Vehicles including motorcycles. I have a 1968 Harley Davidson XL 
> (Sportster) that has the shifter on the right side. IIRC, older British bikes 
> are similar.
>

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] On the Subject of Early MB Slushbox Shifters...

2021-03-07 Thread Allan Streib via Mercedes
Dan Penoff via Mercedes  writes:

> At least it didn’t have the pushbutton start and shutdown at stops
> like some modern cars have. Both of those make me crazy.

I don't like the stop/start either. Seems to me it would put much more
wear on the starter over time. I generally disable it when I drive a car
that has it.

Also the auto-stop of the engine seems to have the uncanny ability to
cause traffic lights to turn green within a few seconds.

Allan

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] On the Subject of Early MB Slushbox Shifters...

2021-03-06 Thread Rick Knoble via Mercedes
> The shifter design was later standardized for all vehicles sold in the US to 
> avoid this.

Yep. Vehicles including motorcycles. I have a 1968 Harley Davidson XL 
(Sportster) that has the shifter on the right side. IIRC, older British bikes 
are similar.


Rick
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] On the Subject of Early MB Slushbox Shifters...

2021-03-06 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
The Dodge pickup truck I had as a rental last week in Flagstaff was really 
weird (to me.) It had a knob on the instrument panel for selecting the gears. I 
kept looking for the shifter (on the column) when I would get in and get ready 
to go. Took a bit of getting used to.

At least it didn’t have the pushbutton start and shutdown at stops like some 
modern cars have. Both of those make me crazy.

-D

> On Mar 6, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Jaime Kopchinski via Mercedes 
>  wrote:
> 
> Before 1968 or so, there was no standard in automatic shifters.  This
> resulted in people getting run over because drivers were unfamiliar with
> all the various types of automatic shifters, especially in situations like
> valet parking where someone may drive many types of cars in a short period
> of time.  The shifter design was later standardized for all vehicles sold
> in the US to avoid this.
> 
> This is covered in details in Nader's Unsafe at any speed.  Quite an
> interesting read.
> 
> We've gone away from this again with modern cars (2007 S class being one of
> the first) but there are many mechanisms in the car to prevent them from
> unexpectedly staying in gear and is regulated by FMVSS.
> 
> Jaime
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 9:57 AM M. Mitchell Marmel via Mercedes <
> mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> 
>> [image: image.png]
>> Why were they mounted essentially upside down with Park at the bottom and
>> 1st at the top?  Seems to be the potential for considerable confusion...
>> 
>> -MMM-
>> ___
>> http://www.okiebenz.com
>> 
>> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>> 
>> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
>> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Jaime Kopchinski
> http://www.jaimekop.com/
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] On the Subject of Early MB Slushbox Shifters...

2021-03-06 Thread Jaime Kopchinski via Mercedes
Before 1968 or so, there was no standard in automatic shifters.  This
resulted in people getting run over because drivers were unfamiliar with
all the various types of automatic shifters, especially in situations like
valet parking where someone may drive many types of cars in a short period
of time.  The shifter design was later standardized for all vehicles sold
in the US to avoid this.

This is covered in details in Nader's Unsafe at any speed.  Quite an
interesting read.

We've gone away from this again with modern cars (2007 S class being one of
the first) but there are many mechanisms in the car to prevent them from
unexpectedly staying in gear and is regulated by FMVSS.

Jaime


On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 9:57 AM M. Mitchell Marmel via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:

> [image: image.png]
> Why were they mounted essentially upside down with Park at the bottom and
> 1st at the top?  Seems to be the potential for considerable confusion...
>
> -MMM-
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
>
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>
>

-- 
Jaime Kopchinski
http://www.jaimekop.com/
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] On the Subject of Early MB Slushbox Shifters...

2021-03-06 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
Might have been the “Jetaway 200” that my 1962 Series 60 Cadillac Fleetwood 
had. I don’t recall if “R” was at the far right on that.

-D

> On Mar 5, 2021, at 6:40 PM, Peter Frederick via Mercedes 
>  wrote:
> 
> Do you remember that Hydramatics had the reverse on the far right?  Past Low.
> 
> One of the early Federal automotive requirements was the PRNDL pattern -- far 
> too many cars were jumping curbs because the sloppy linkage GM used (nearly 
> everyone else had quit using Hydramatics after the 1950s fire than destroyed 
> the Hydramatic plant) would have the transmission actually in low gear while 
> the display looked like it was in reverse.
> 
> We had one on the 62 Olds, I think it was changed for the 63 model.  
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] On the Subject of Early MB Slushbox Shifters...

2021-03-05 Thread Peter Frederick via Mercedes
Do you remember that Hydramatics had the reverse on the far right?  Past Low.

One of the early Federal automotive requirements was the PRNDL pattern -- far 
too many cars were jumping curbs because the sloppy linkage GM used (nearly 
everyone else had quit using Hydramatics after the 1950s fire than destroyed 
the Hydramatic plant) would have the transmission actually in low gear while 
the display looked like it was in reverse.

We had one on the 62 Olds, I think it was changed for the 63 model.  
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] On the Subject of Early MB Slushbox Shifters...

2021-03-05 Thread M. Mitchell Marmel via Mercedes
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 8:59 AM Dan Penoff via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:

> This is a manual, you realize.
>

Yeah, but the pic reminded me of the goofy LDNRP arrangement, as they used
the same type of shift knob.

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 12:47 PM Frederick Moir via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:

> My old Mk8 jaguar (RHD in UK) was PNDLR, just to add confusion.
> The trans was sourced from the US.
>

H'm.  I now seem to vaguely remember that DB also sourced US slushboxes at
first.  Perhaps they needed a weird linkage setup to make 'em fit?

-MMM-
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] On the Subject of Early MB Slushbox Shifters...

2021-03-05 Thread Frederick Moir via Mercedes
My old Mk8 jaguar (RHD in UK) was PNDLR, just to add confusion.
The trans was sourced from the US.
Fred.

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 9:59 AM Dan Penoff via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:

> This is a manual, you realize.
>
> As for the PRNDL arrangement on the slushboxes, I have no idea, but it was
> weird.
>
> -D
>
> > On Mar 5, 2021, at 9:56 AM, M. Mitchell Marmel via Mercedes <
> mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> >
> > [image: image.png]
> > Why were they mounted essentially upside down with Park at the bottom and
> > 1st at the top?  Seems to be the potential for considerable confusion...
> >
> > -MMM-
> > ___
> > http://www.okiebenz.com
> >
> > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> >
> > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> >
>
>
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
>
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>
>

-- 
Fred Moir
Lynn MA
Diesel preferred
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] On the Subject of Early MB Slushbox Shifters...

2021-03-05 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
This is a manual, you realize.

As for the PRNDL arrangement on the slushboxes, I have no idea, but it was 
weird.

-D

> On Mar 5, 2021, at 9:56 AM, M. Mitchell Marmel via Mercedes 
>  wrote:
> 
> [image: image.png]
> Why were they mounted essentially upside down with Park at the bottom and
> 1st at the top?  Seems to be the potential for considerable confusion...
> 
> -MMM-
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com