Oops. She's still gorgeous
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:33:46 -0600, Mitch Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luther wrote:
The second Leia is MUCH better looking. Naturally gorgeous.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm204/
Portman wasn't a 2nd Leia, she's Luke and Leia's mother.
Fisher wasn't bad
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:40:04 -0600 Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got a zoom lense? :)
I didn't need a zoom lens when she walked about a foot from me on my next
door neighbor's porch.
Craig
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list
Dude, what kind of geek are you? She's Leia's MOM.
Still...
-Curt
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:25:31 -0600
From: Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Sleeper 300CD and the forces of evil
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text
Got a zoom lense? :)
Luther
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:48:13 -0600, Craig McCluskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:33:46 -0500 Mitch Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luther wrote:
The second Leia is MUCH better looking. Naturally gorgeous.
The second Leia is MUCH better looking. Naturally gorgeous.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm204/
Luther, preferring brunettes over blondes
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:29:54 -0600, Rich Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uh, dude, have you seen her lately? Aside from the age since then, she
has
Luther wrote:
The second Leia is MUCH better looking. Naturally gorgeous.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm204/
Portman wasn't a 2nd Leia, she's Luke and Leia's mother.
Fisher wasn't bad looking in Star Wars, but her face was already
starting to look old by the time they filmed Return of the
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:33:46 -0500 Mitch Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luther wrote:
The second Leia is MUCH better looking. Naturally gorgeous.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm204/
Portman wasn't a 2nd Leia, she's Luke and Leia's mother.
She's also starring in the movie _Brothers_,
