.6 and 2.8, given that the 2.8 has
electronic fuel injection it should have been a bit better on the juice.
Hendrik
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 4:46 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] which six
>> <> be
>> better but i
> < better but if I was gonna have a motor that I have to maintain and fix
> myself then I would choose a 103, also whilst the 104 has more power it does
> not have that much more torque than the 103.>>
>
My '89 2.6 M103 with 158hp (or thereabouts) had a distributor, points, CIS,
and an exposed
nna have a motor that I have to maintain and fix
myself then I would choose a 103, also whilst the 104 has more power it does
not have that much more torque than the 103.
Hendrik
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:54 AM
Subject: Re:
In a message dated 1/13/2008 6:24:56 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The 3.0 Liter Inline 6 cylinder M103 engine (much more reliable than the
> M104) ...>>
>
Absolute nonsense. The M104 is better in many ways.
RLE
Opinions are like A--holes, everyone has one!
> <<"The 3.0 Liter Inline 6 cylinder M103 engine (much more reliable than the
> M104) ...>>
>
Absolute nonsense. The M104 is better in many ways.
RLE
**
Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape.
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp003000
