Re: [MBZ] CU's latest reliability ratings-

2005-11-18 Thread OK Don
Their reliability ratings are (or were, last time I looked) based on
surveys of owners/subscribers during the first year of ownership. Not
very applicable to those of us who buy 15 year old, or older cars --



 I've never been entirely sure what to make of CU's reliability ratings.
 They're so generic.  Unreliable could mean anything from the sunroof
 jams a lot to the engine falls out onto the road.  This is
 demonstrated by the fact that luxury cars (which have more to go wrong)
 tend to make the least reliable list regularly.

 ___
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net



--
OK Don, KD5NRO
Norman, OK
'90 300D, '87 300SDL,  '81 240D,  '78 450SLC
The FSM created the Diesel Benz
http://www.venganza.org/



Re: [MBZ] CU's latest reliability ratings-

2005-11-17 Thread TimothyPilgrim
Also note:

Least Reliable:

SPORTY CARS/
CONVERTIBLES/COUPES: Volkswagen New Beetle Convertible, Mercedes-Benz
SL, Mercedes-Benz CLK, Ford Mustang (V6)*, Chevrolet Corvett

WAGONS: Mercedes-Benz E-Class, Volkswagen Passat (V6) (2005), Volvo V50*

Yet none of the M-B SUVs make the best or worst lists... Now why is
that? Is Mercedes also now an SUV company that happens to produce
cars? At least the C-class didn't score poorly.

Tim
1982 300TD Moby

On 11/15/05, OK Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 http://autos.msn.com/advice/CRArt.aspx?contentid=4023544src=LP%20Passenger

 Least reliable:

 SEDANS: Jaguar S-Type, Lincoln LS, Mercedes-Benz E-Class, Saab 9-3,
 Mercedes-Benz S-Class, BMW 5-Series (V8), Audi A8, Chrysler 300 (V8)*,
 BMW 7 series

 --
 OK Don, KD5NRO
 Norman, OK
 '90 300D, '87 300SDL,  '81 240D,  '78 450SLC
 The FSM created the Diesel Benz
 http://www.venganza.org/

 ___
 For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
 For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net




Re: [MBZ] CU's latest reliability ratings-

2005-11-17 Thread David Brodbeck

OK Don wrote:

http://autos.msn.com/advice/CRArt.aspx?contentid=4023544src=LP%20Passenger

Least reliable:

SEDANS: Jaguar S-Type, Lincoln LS, Mercedes-Benz E-Class, Saab 9-3,
Mercedes-Benz S-Class, BMW 5-Series (V8), Audi A8, Chrysler 300 (V8)*,
BMW 7 series
  


I've never been entirely sure what to make of CU's reliability ratings.  
They're so generic.  Unreliable could mean anything from the sunroof 
jams a lot to the engine falls out onto the road.  This is 
demonstrated by the fact that luxury cars (which have more to go wrong) 
tend to make the least reliable list regularly.