Re: [MBZ] First Biodiesel, now cranberries

2005-11-24 Thread TimothyPilgrim
Obviously because we humans have been sending probes there that are
warming the atmosphere!

Tim

On 11/24/05, Craig McCluskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:00:52 -0600 Kaleb C. Striplin
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  If the earth is warming because of humans then why is Mars also warming?

 Superb question, Kaleb!


 Craig



Re: [MBZ] First Biodiesel, now cranberries

2005-11-24 Thread Hans Neureiter
Not the humans. The sun is making it's last effort before dying.
--
Hans Neureiter, Houston, TX
'82 300SD, '95 E300D



 On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:00:52 -0600 Kaleb C. Striplin
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  If the earth is warming because of humans then why is Mars also warming?



Re: [MBZ] First Biodiesel, now cranberries

2005-11-23 Thread Loren Faeth
Greenie Weenie idiots.  Cranberries were growing here long before 
people.  The greenie weenies WAY overinflate their self-worth.  They should 
all be made into Biodiesel.


As to the impact of biofuels
Madam Pele spews more CO, NOx and other miscellaneous offal into the air in 
any given day from Kilauea than what is created by mere mortals driving 
around.  And that is only one volcano.  If you add up all the volcanos, 
there is a whole lot.  Remember Mt St Helens?  The immediate predictions 
were that the climate was going to change, we might even enter an Ice age 
in Norte America, and whole countries would be deforested from the ash 
cloud, CO, NOx, etc.


What happened?  The ash fell, the trees cleansed the air, and before the 
ash had been carried 1000 miles in the jet stream, there was no effect.  IN 
fact, that was about the last of the dire screeching about the coming Ice 
age, and the birth of the global warming BS.


Oh, by the way, What happens to all the stuff spewed by Madam Pele?

A short distance downwind, and you can be suffocated by the gasses.  Funny 
thing, if you get a short distance from the island, there is no 
trace.  Nature is a wondrous thing.  The earth heals itself, whether the 
wounds are self inflicted or inflicted by mere mortals.


I guess some on the list are not old enough to remember Mt St. Helens, but 
go read some real history.  It will astound you!


The global warming BS has been around for 20 years.  It is time to start 
the screeching about the coming ice age again.


At 06:58 PM 11/22/2005, you wrote:

How can you enjoy driving that diesel and eating cranberry sauce when it
is going to drive the earth to ruin?  I might have to move to Mars, no
wait, it is warming up globally too, I think from those rovers we sent
there...

--R (stirring worries, and gravy)


Wetland worries color cranberry industry
By Traci Watson, USA TODAY
The fruit that brings a welcome splash of puckery crimson to
Thanksgiving feasts has also stirred worries about the impact it has on
the environment before it reaches the nation's dining-room tables. MORE
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-11-22-cranberries_x.htm?csp=34


___
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net





Re: [MBZ] First Biodiesel, now cranberries

2005-11-23 Thread Zeitgeist
Yes, clearly concern for the environment and the human impact on its
various and sundry ecosystems is a silly waste of time.  Nothing to
see here...as you were.

Casey
Olympia, WA
Biodiesel: I drive in a persistent vegetative state
'87 300TD intercooler (211k)
'84 300D (205k)
Gashuffer:
'89 Vanagon Wolfsburg Edition (186K)



Re: [MBZ] First Biodiesel, now cranberries

2005-11-23 Thread David Brodbeck

Loren Faeth wrote:

...the trees cleansed the air...


Wait, I thought Ronald Reagan said that trees cause pollution.  Now 
they're cleansing the air?





Re: [MBZ] First Biodiesel, now cranberries

2005-11-23 Thread David Brodbeck

Zeitgeist wrote:

Yes, clearly concern for the environment and the human impact on its
various and sundry ecosystems is a silly waste of time.  Nothing to
see here...as you were.
  


Yeah.  They told us lead was harmless, a little nuclear radiation would 
never hurt anyone, and tobacco couldn't possibly cause cancer, and we 
know how well those predictions turned out.  We need to trust the 
scientists that shill for corporations.  They always have our best 
interests at heart.





Re: [MBZ] First Biodiesel, now cranberries

2005-11-23 Thread Loren Faeth
Hmmm,   If you get out your Geiger counter, you will find that everything 
around you is radioactive to some degree.  My science project in Jr high 
was monitoring radiation in common store-bought milk.  Yep, it is 
radioactive too!  So, if a little radiation will kill you, You'd better 
hurry off the planet, because, guess what!  There is lots of radiation all 
around you!


Only greenie weenies feed their kids lead paint.  The rest of us tell the 
kids not to eat paint.


Gotcha goin' didn't I? grin

Junk science is still junk!

At 09:18 PM 11/22/2005, you wrote:

Yeah.  They told us lead was harmless, a little nuclear radiation would
never hurt anyone





Re: [MBZ] First Biodiesel, now cranberries

2005-11-23 Thread David Brodbeck

Loren Faeth wrote:

Junk science is still junk!
  


And shill science is still shill science.  It's instructive to look at 
the global warming skeptics and see who's paying them to reach those 
conclusions.




Re: [MBZ] First Biodiesel, now cranberries

2005-11-23 Thread Loren Faeth
Skeptics of those who claim global warming is caused by human activity are 
by and large independent thinkers.  Those who claim  global warming is 
caused by human activity are by and large sheeple led by avowed communists 
and those of the socialist philosophy, and largely anti christian.  It is 
also very instructive to see who is paying them.  I do agree that it is 
very instructive to see who is paying whom on both sides.


TO counter your claim, I make my money teaching computer networking.  How 
does that relate to being paid by the evil oil companies?  I have had 
papers published in scientific journals, I am a Certified Quality Engineer, 
and a Certified Manufacturing Technologist.  My graduate and post graduate 
research was technical, related to science and engineering.  I am named on 
a patent because of that research.  There are many on the list who hold 
better credentials than mine.


The science shows that the earth goes through long term warming and cooling 
cycles.  It also shows the sun is burning hotter than it did, say 20 years 
ago.  Science show earth temps are related to the heat generated by the 
sun.  Statistics show that there is nothing out of normal variation 
cycles.  There was a hot cycle in the 30s that created the dust bowl 
phenomenon.  Then we went into a cool cycle.  Many record lows were set in 
the 50s - 70s.  The current warming trend was predictable, just as is the 
cooling trend that will come.  I have not seen any evidence put forth by 
greenie weenies that will stand up to scientific scrutiny for long.  I am 
not for or against greenie weenies, I am looking for the truth behind the 
shreiking of those looking for media attention.


Apply Deming and Shewharts  Statistical Process Control principles to temp 
trends over the span of recorded history and you will see there is nothing 
out of normal variance.  That is science.


Read How to Lie with Statistics.  It is somewhat outdated, but 
entertaining and instructive.


Junk science is still junk.

At 10:30 PM 11/22/2005, you wrote:

Loren Faeth wrote:
 Junk science is still junk!


And shill science is still shill science.  It's instructive to look at
the global warming skeptics and see who's paying them to reach those
conclusions.

___
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net





Re: [MBZ] First Biodiesel, now cranberries

2005-11-23 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
If the earth is warming because of humans then why is Mars also warming? 
 I know, its Bush's fault.


Loren Faeth wrote:
Skeptics of those who claim global warming is caused by human activity are 
by and large independent thinkers.  Those who claim  global warming is 
caused by human activity are by and large sheeple led by avowed communists 
and those of the socialist philosophy, and largely anti christian.  It is 
also very instructive to see who is paying them.  I do agree that it is 
very instructive to see who is paying whom on both sides.


TO counter your claim, I make my money teaching computer networking.  How 
does that relate to being paid by the evil oil companies?  I have had 
papers published in scientific journals, I am a Certified Quality Engineer, 
and a Certified Manufacturing Technologist.  My graduate and post graduate 
research was technical, related to science and engineering.  I am named on 
a patent because of that research.  There are many on the list who hold 
better credentials than mine.


The science shows that the earth goes through long term warming and cooling 
cycles.  It also shows the sun is burning hotter than it did, say 20 years 
ago.  Science show earth temps are related to the heat generated by the 
sun.  Statistics show that there is nothing out of normal variation 
cycles.  There was a hot cycle in the 30s that created the dust bowl 
phenomenon.  Then we went into a cool cycle.  Many record lows were set in 
the 50s - 70s.  The current warming trend was predictable, just as is the 
cooling trend that will come.  I have not seen any evidence put forth by 
greenie weenies that will stand up to scientific scrutiny for long.  I am 
not for or against greenie weenies, I am looking for the truth behind the 
shreiking of those looking for media attention.


Apply Deming and Shewharts  Statistical Process Control principles to temp 
trends over the span of recorded history and you will see there is nothing 
out of normal variance.  That is science.


Read How to Lie with Statistics.  It is somewhat outdated, but 
entertaining and instructive.


Junk science is still junk.

At 10:30 PM 11/22/2005, you wrote:


Loren Faeth wrote:


Junk science is still junk!



And shill science is still shill science.  It's instructive to look at
the global warming skeptics and see who's paying them to reach those
conclusions.

___
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net




___
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net





--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
 89 560SEL, 87 300SDL, 85 380SE, 85 300D,
 84 250 LWB, 83 300TD, 81 300TD, 81 240D, 81 240D,
 76 450SEL, 76 240D, 76 300D, 74 240D, 69 250
Okie Benz Auto parts-email for used parts



Re: [MBZ] First Biodiesel, now cranberries

2005-11-23 Thread Zeitgeist
Uh, you forgot to mention that the godless commies are also seeking to
introduce foreign substances into our precious bodily fluids...and sap
our vital essences!   Whatever you do, don't let the red menace sap
your vital essence.

On 11/23/05, Loren Faeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Skeptics of those who claim global warming is caused by human activity are
 by and large independent thinkers.  Those who claim  global warming is
 caused by human activity are by and large sheeple led by avowed communists
 and those of the socialist philosophy, and largely anti christian.  It is
 also very instructive to see who is paying them.  I do agree that it is
 very instructive to see who is paying whom on both sides.

 TO counter your claim, I make my money teaching computer networking.  How
 does that relate to being paid by the evil oil companies?  I have had
 papers published in scientific journals, I am a Certified Quality Engineer,
 and a Certified Manufacturing Technologist.  My graduate and post graduate
 research was technical, related to science and engineering.  I am named on
 a patent because of that research.  There are many on the list who hold
 better credentials than mine.

 The science shows that the earth goes through long term warming and cooling
 cycles.  It also shows the sun is burning hotter than it did, say 20 years
 ago.  Science show earth temps are related to the heat generated by the
 sun.  Statistics show that there is nothing out of normal variation
 cycles.  There was a hot cycle in the 30s that created the dust bowl
 phenomenon.  Then we went into a cool cycle.  Many record lows were set in
 the 50s - 70s.  The current warming trend was predictable, just as is the
 cooling trend that will come.  I have not seen any evidence put forth by
 greenie weenies that will stand up to scientific scrutiny for long.  I am
 not for or against greenie weenies, I am looking for the truth behind the
 shreiking of those looking for media attention.

 Apply Deming and Shewharts  Statistical Process Control principles to temp
 trends over the span of recorded history and you will see there is nothing
 out of normal variance.  That is science.

 Read How to Lie with Statistics.  It is somewhat outdated, but
 entertaining and instructive.

 Junk science is still junk.

Casey
Olympia, WA
Biodiesel: I drive in a persistent vegetative state
'87 300TD intercooler (211k)
'84 300D (205k)
Gashuffer:
'89 Vanagon Wolfsburg Edition (186K)