Re: [MBZ] Was: Turbo seal? Now OM603 compression test

2005-12-03 Thread Peter Frederick
Marshall: The Volvo had 150,000 miles on it when I got it (now has 220,000 or so), and I believe the turbo was shot when I got it. Certainly the new one is MUCH louder, unlike my Benz turbo. The Benz was used, and was smoking when purchased, but being a W140 I don't know if it had the trap

Re: [MBZ] Was: Turbo seal? Now OM603 compression test

2005-12-03 Thread Marshall Booth
Peter Frederick wrote: Marshall: The Volvo had 150,000 miles on it when I got it (now has 220,000 or so), and I believe the turbo was shot when I got it. Certainly the new one is MUCH louder, unlike my Benz turbo. The Benz was used, and was smoking when purchased, but being a W140 I don't

Re: [MBZ] Was: Turbo seal? Now OM603 compression test

2005-12-02 Thread Marshall Booth
Peter Frederick wrote: Marshall: I know of two turbos that have failed in exactly that fashion, one on my car and one on someone else's. Both showed serious lack of boost at low speed cold and both showed excessive oil consumption. One (the MB one) blew blue smoke on acceleration. My

Re: [MBZ] Was: Turbo seal? Now OM603 compression test

2005-12-01 Thread Peter Frederick
Marshall: I know of two turbos that have failed in exactly that fashion, one on my car and one on someone else's. Both showed serious lack of boost at low speed cold and both showed excessive oil consumption. One (the MB one) blew blue smoke on acceleration. My volvo TD didn't, but the

Re: [MBZ] Was: Turbo seal? Now OM603 compression test

2005-11-30 Thread Peter Frederick
Your turbo is shot, get it fixed. It's leaking oil into the exhaust side, and it burns off when you accelerate. It will eventually make such a smokescreen you will get ticketed for excessive smoke, but the engine will run fine. Your compression is a normal (lower than new, considerably