We pushed a new release for the evolve extension: 10.0.2.
As usual, the release is available on PyPI and upgrade is recommended.
This is a bugfix release that addresses issues in split and uncommit
commands from evolve extension and revset logic in topic extension.
Check the changelog for
We pushed a new release for the evolve extension: 10.0.2.
As usual, the release is available on PyPI and upgrade is recommended.
This is a bugfix release that addresses issues in split and uncommit
commands from evolve extension and revset logic in topic extension.
Check the changelog for
2 new changesets in mercurial:
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg/rev/8ddbb75bad09
changeset: 45413:8ddbb75bad09
parent: 45411:a42999f611ff
user:Augie Fackler
date:Mon Sep 07 15:31:34 2020 -0400
summary: git: convert tz offset to int (issue6359)
New changeset (1 on stable) in mercurial:
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg/rev/aaeccdb6e654
changeset: 45412:aaeccdb6e654
branch: stable
tag: tip
parent: 45398:d58a205d0672
user:Matt Harbison
date:Fri Sep 04 15:21:02 2020 -0400
summary: repoview: pin
queued, thanks
> On Sep 9, 2020, at 08:20, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
>
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Yuya Nishihara
> # Date 1599568690 -32400
> # Tue Sep 08 21:38:10 2020 +0900
> # Node ID cc233fb2375feef75d3f9619ed69cd5d5dea89dd
> # Parent 89d2c8f8bb4f5bfda272d2665ebcacd98e273d25
>
queued, thanks
> On Sep 9, 2020, at 08:17, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
>
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Yuya Nishihara
> # Date 1599619911 -32400
> # Wed Sep 09 11:51:51 2020 +0900
> # Node ID 89d2c8f8bb4f5bfda272d2665ebcacd98e273d25
> # Parent 0babbc33baec093b9119be36ec535edb8a12b3b8
>
durin42 created this revision.
Herald added a reviewer: hg-reviewers.
Herald added a subscriber: mercurial-patches.
REVISION SUMMARY
This is broken on Python 3.9rc1, and while it sounds like there may be
a fix in Python, we probably also should have this workaround in place
in hg. See the
On 9/8/20 1:58 PM, PIERRE AUGIER wrote:
Hi,
I was working on a PR to add Mercurial support to MyBinder
(https://github.com/jupyterhub/repo2docker/pull/950).
I need to add mercurial and hg-evolve as requirements.
However, since there is no wheel updated for Linux and OSX, (i) the CI fails
pulkit created this revision.
Herald added a reviewer: hg-reviewers.
Herald added a subscriber: mercurial-patches.
REVISION SUMMARY
Some merges can result in file being absent form working directory. This can
be
one of file was kept deleted or file was removed by merge code.
User might
pulkit created this revision.
Herald added a reviewer: hg-reviewers.
Herald added a subscriber: mercurial-patches.
REVISION SUMMARY
`ACTION_KEEP` is overloaded and it's hard to figure out how we end up with
this
KEEP, what was the state of things.
In a previous patch, we introduced
# HG changeset patch
# User Yuya Nishihara
# Date 1599619278 -32400
# Wed Sep 09 11:41:18 2020 +0900
# Node ID d9a83a225c54affd48b570c486bd4f08a6877252
# Parent cc233fb2375feef75d3f9619ed69cd5d5dea89dd
grep: fix hash(linestate) to not include linenum
linestate.__eq__() just compares the
# HG changeset patch
# User Yuya Nishihara
# Date 1599568690 -32400
# Tue Sep 08 21:38:10 2020 +0900
# Node ID cc233fb2375feef75d3f9619ed69cd5d5dea89dd
# Parent 89d2c8f8bb4f5bfda272d2665ebcacd98e273d25
test-grep: document that trivially moved lines might not be detected
I'm not going to
# HG changeset patch
# User Yuya Nishihara
# Date 1599619911 -32400
# Wed Sep 09 11:51:51 2020 +0900
# Node ID 89d2c8f8bb4f5bfda272d2665ebcacd98e273d25
# Parent 0babbc33baec093b9119be36ec535edb8a12b3b8
revset: remove indirect indexing of status tuple
Just use the attribute name.
diff
New changeset in mercurial:
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg/rev/a42999f611ff
changeset: 45411:a42999f611ff
bookmark:@
tag: tip
parent: 45410:2d08dcf8fd9e
parent: 45398:d58a205d0672
user:Augie Fackler
date:Mon Sep 07 15:20:31 2020 -0400
summary:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 9:32 AM Raphaël Gomès
wrote:
> Whether it should be a separate flag is another question
Would it be possible to override -b to accept topics? I think it would be
better than a separate custom flag.
--
| Raffaele Salmaso
| https://salmaso.org
|
A I see. I misunderstood what you were saying. My apologies.
If I understand correctly now, you are proposing that during a merge you
get to pick at each point how the merge is done, like an interactive
merge. I thought you were talking about during a conflicting graft,
sorry for not
> Uwe Brauer writes:
> In what way the results of the merge not be the same in terms of the
> graph? As far as I am aware, a graft doesn't connect the source commit
> in the graph. The graph would look the same with what I suggested. Is
> my understanding incorrect?
I am
17 matches
Mail list logo