Re: problems understanding backout

On 8/9/20 7:38 PM, Uwe Brauer wrote: Hi I very use backout rarely. (Either I strip or solve the problem in a different way). I realised that I don't really understand its logic. Take the following script hg init echo "First" > test.org hg add test.org hg commit -m "0: First" echo "Second"

Re: problems understanding backout

>>> "MM" == Malcolm Matalka writes: > Did you figure hit sout? I just did a test locally and the backout > worked as expected. In the latest head I ran hg backout -r 2 > --no-commit (I wanted to verify it). When I ran that, I was presented > with a merge screen to handle the

Re: problems understanding backout

Did you figure hit sout? I just did a test locally and the backout worked as expected. In the latest head I ran hg backout -r 2 --no-commit (I wanted to verify it). When I ran that, I was presented with a merge screen to handle the conflict caused by the backout, and afterwards I had the

Re: problems understanding backout

>>> "UB" == Uwe Brauer writes: > Hi > I very use backout rarely. (Either I strip or solve the problem in a > different way). > I realised that I don't really understand its logic. > Take the following script > hg init > echo "First" > test.org > hg add test.org >

problems understanding backout

Hi I very use backout rarely. (Either I strip or solve the problem in a different way). I realised that I don't really understand its logic. Take the following script hg init echo "First" > test.org hg add test.org hg commit -m "0: First" echo "Second" >> test.org hg commit -m "1: Second"