Re: call for Emacs testers (and opinion) native support of hg ci -i

> Hi Uwe, > On 10/10/2022 22:17, Uwe Brauer wrote: > Sounds really great. > This is interesting and I'd be happy to test it, if I get the time > (that is the hard part as you can imagine). Such a feature could even > get me to actually use `vc-hg`, especially if we can get the variant > for `hg

Re: call for Emacs testers (and opinion) native support of hg ci -i

Hi Georges Great that a developer is interested, sorry for the delay. > Hi Uwe, > On 10/10/2022 22:17, Uwe Brauer wrote: > Sounds really great. > This is interesting and I'd be happy to test it, if I get the time > (that is the hard part as you can imagine). Such a feature could even > get me

Re: call for Emacs testers (and opinion) native support of hg ci -i

Hi Uwe, On 10/10/2022 22:17, Uwe Brauer wrote: Hi I am not sure how many mercurial users, also use GNU emacs for their work. I do, and I am mostly happy with vc-hg.el provided by GNU emacs. There is however one feature I really miss, hg ci -i So that you can just commit certain hunks.

call for Emacs testers (and opinion) native support of hg ci -i

Hi I am not sure how many mercurial users, also use GNU emacs for their work. I do, and I am mostly happy with vc-hg.el provided by GNU emacs. There is however one feature I really miss, hg ci -i So that you can just commit certain hunks. Well using [ui] interface = curses The online