> On Dec 2, 2016, at 9:51 PM, Pierre-Yves David
> wrote:
>
>> One aspect Augie and I discussed was to keep a few placeholder flags for
>> home brewed extensions to register transforms on.
>
> Do you have some specific example in mind, or just having some
On 11/28/2016 01:58 AM, Augie Fackler wrote:
On Nov 27, 2016, at 7:38 PM, Pierre-Yves David
wrote:
here is my current understanding of the situation:
Before this patch:
--
1) histedit was refusing to run on public changeset in all cases
On 11/30/2016 06:35 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:
+cc:remi
On Nov 29, 2016 13:51, "Kyle Lippincott via Mercurial-devel" <
mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Augie Fackler wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 07:59:11AM +0100,
On 11/29/2016 06:02 PM, Rémi Chaintron wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 at 06:59 Pierre-Yves David <
pierre-yves.da...@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
On 11/23/2016 06:39 PM, Remi Chaintron wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Remi Chaintron
# Date 1479922644 0
# Wed Nov 23 17:37:24 2016
On 11/29/2016 06:16 PM, Rémi Chaintron wrote:
Thanks for the awesome review.
I included the changes in my current version and will update the stack
once I'm done with all required changes.
The approach I'm currently following relies on getting rid of the
flagprocessor object, instead relying on
Sorry for the long delay, I've been far too busy in November,
There is a couple thing that you could do to help getting a lower
latency on such review. (actual answer to actual question are available
inline)
[CCing me on patch series]
Do not automatically CC me on all your series
On 11/24/2016 08:22 PM, FUJIWARA Katsunori wrote:
At Thu, 24 Nov 2016 17:04:38 +0100,
Pierre-Yves David wrote:
Recently, Foozy created a Plan page for the matcher issues:
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/FileNamePatternsPlan
It is a good start but there is a couple of elements that are
https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5437
Bug ID: 5437
Summary: Selecting a partial chunk in revert -i reverts the
whole chunk
Product: Mercurial
Version: default branch
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:15:57PM +, Mateusz Kwapich wrote:
> I like the relocate idea. It would be an useful abstractions - we have a
> lot of things that are rewriting one commit at a time.
These patches are queued with the rename of the class performed. Thanks!
>
> Excerpts from Jun Wu's
Cc Jeremy
On 12/2/16, 1:41 PM, "Augie Fackler" wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:58:25PM -0800, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Gregory Szorc
> # Date 1480399779 28800
> # Mon Nov 28 22:09:39 2016 -0800
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:58:25PM -0800, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Gregory Szorc
> # Date 1480399779 28800
> # Mon Nov 28 22:09:39 2016 -0800
> # Node ID b39ac39041fb47bee2ff9aa49212b84ad83138ae
> # Parent
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:58:23PM -0800, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Gregory Szorc
> # Date 1480396071 28800
> # Mon Nov 28 21:07:51 2016 -0800
> # Node ID df89cc275198b7ebebf2f9a477a1886c5fef2288
> # Parent
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:58:22PM -0800, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Gregory Szorc
> # Date 1480395590 28800
> # Mon Nov 28 20:59:50 2016 -0800
> # Node ID 36c296adbfabc1f7301dd6f94b5f4515e6a61b81
> # Parent
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:58:19PM -0800, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Gregory Szorc
> # Date 1480394802 28800
> # Mon Nov 28 20:46:42 2016 -0800
> # Node ID e32ff1ce869243618aaab30bb6fba2b13be536ff
> # Parent
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:46:04PM +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 14:26:03 +, Kostia Balytskyi wrote:
> > I like this and previous patch, but if the purpose of this one is to provide
> > examlpes to developers, should we maybe also include debugformatter?
>
> Good point,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 07:26:44PM +, Jun Wu wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Jun Wu
> # Date 1480533784 0
> # Wed Nov 30 19:23:04 2016 +
> # Node ID ff3e01283fa1843920ad63dc1ff7bc6b0a4dbccb
> # Parent 830986c78bb9697057768d64c8556d1dc03c0674
> # Available At
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 04:58:28PM +, Jun Wu wrote:
> Looks good to me. Thanks for the fix!
> A small nit inline - probably could be fixed on flight.
>
> Excerpts from Martijn Pieters's message of 2016-11-30 16:51:41 +:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Martijn Pieters
# HG changeset patch
# User Jeremy Wall (zaphar)
# Date 1480542942 21600
# Wed Nov 30 15:55:42 2016 -0600
# Node ID 9cb1540e417dc79a55944adffb691a3ada01571c
# Parent 9e29d4e4e08b5996adda49cdd0b497d89e2b16ee
push: add a message when pushing phases but not changes
At Thu, 24 Nov 2016 17:04:38 +0100,
Pierre-Yves David wrote:
>
> Recently, Foozy created a Plan page for the matcher issues:
>
> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/FileNamePatternsPlan
>
> It is a good start but there is a couple of elements that are
> missing or still a bit fuzzy to me.
>
>
New changeset in mercurial:
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg/rev/1775975dd439
changeset: 30554:1775975dd439
bookmark:@
tag: tip
user:Kostia Balytskyi
date:Tue Nov 29 07:20:03 2016 -0800
summary: shelve: move patch extension to a string
Excerpts from Yuya Nishihara's message of 2016-12-02 23:19:56 +0900:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:38:53 +0100, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> > Yuya Nishihara a écrit :
> > > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:12:35 +0100, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> > >> Denis Laxalde a écrit :
> > >>> # HG changeset patch
> > >>> # User
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:36:42 +0100, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> Yuya Nishihara a écrit :
> > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:54:15 +0100, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> >> +def changesrange(fctx1, fctx2, linerange2):
> >> +"""Return `(diffinrange, linerange1)` where `diffinrange` is
> >> True
> >> +
4 new changesets (3 on stable) in mercurial:
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg/rev/b3b1ae98f6a0
changeset: 30550:b3b1ae98f6a0
branch: stable
tag: 4.0.1
parent: 30419:819f96b82fa4
user:Wagner Bruna
date:Fri Nov 25 07:39:02 2016 -0200
On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 04:32:47 +0530, Pulkit Goyal wrote:
> There is something strange. One of the patch you pushed and replied to
> the mail is not the same.
I've queued new versions of these patches.
> >> https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2016-October/089102.html
> >
> >
On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 07:22:55 -0800, Kostia Balytskyi wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Kostia Balytskyi
> # Date 1480432803 28800
> # Tue Nov 29 07:20:03 2016 -0800
> # Node ID f6f0ab3f7b0ea0e05cfdcd7afd4994ea21988fd9
> # Parent 64b55bffc1c059eb4c11ca195b561ca8a287f59e
On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:55:06 +, Jun Wu wrote:
> Excerpts from Kostia Balytskyi's message of 2016-11-29 07:22:56 -0800:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Kostia Balytskyi
> > # Date 1480426193 28800
> > # Tue Nov 29 05:29:53 2016 -0800
> > # Node ID
* Kevin Bullock [20161201 21:24]:
> > On Nov 30, 2016, at 01:39, Thomas Arendsen Hein
> > wrote:
> > * Gregory Szorc [20161130 04:53]:
> >> Anyone know what process sends these emails? It would be nice to see the
27 matches
Mail list logo