Re: [PATCH] match: adding non-recursive directory matching

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 1:03 AM, FUJIWARA Katsunori wrote: > > At Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:27:17 -0800, > Rodrigo Damazio wrote: > > > > [1 ] > > [1.1 ] > > All sounds very reasonable, and "filesin:" or "rootfilesin:" LGTM. > > Is it OK for your solution that

[PATCH remotenames-ext] display: compute whether the node is obsolete only if needed

# HG changeset patch # User Kostia Balytskyi # Date 1485532411 28800 # Fri Jan 27 07:53:31 2017 -0800 # Node ID 494e92ec0cef1e98a5ac0a233d1fc7dcb6ac3fc7 # Parent ad31e88e4c85ba95642231f73c0915dd6997962f display: compute whether the node is obsolete only if needed For

Re: [PATCH] match: adding non-recursive directory matching

At Thu, 26 Jan 2017 17:27:17 -0800, Rodrigo Damazio wrote: > > [1 ] > [1.1 ] > All sounds very reasonable, and "filesin:" or "rootfilesin:" LGTM. Is it OK for your solution that "rootfilesin:FOO" doesn't match against "file FOO", even though your patch posted in this thread made "files:FOO"