https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5526
Bug ID: 5526
Summary: Error trying to convert cpp-netlib git repo
Product: Mercurial
Version: 4.0.2
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
obsstore-based hidden is broken by design, since it cannot unhide commits:
$ hg export . > patch.txt
$ hg prune . # could also be done by pulling obsmarkers from a remote
# peer, or it could be amend / metaedit etc.
$ hg import --exact --bypass patch.txt # cannot really
Excerpts from Pierre-Yves David's message of 2017-04-06 01:09:47 +0200:
>
> On 04/05/2017 10:54 PM, Jun Wu wrote:
> > I don't think "writing things that hook *may* need to filesystem" is a good
> > approach. It introduces unnecessary overhead if the hook does not need that
> > information.
>
> I
On 04/05/2017 10:54 PM, Jun Wu wrote:
I don't think "writing things that hook *may* need to filesystem" is a good
approach. It introduces unnecessary overhead if the hook does not need that
information.
I do not find the overhead concerning.
The thing to keep in mind is that if they are
On 04/05/2017 03:30 PM, Ryan McElroy wrote:
[…]
I strongly believe that going back into a long discussion or battle over
how evolve should behave is a good use of anyone's time. Can't we just
build out core hiding mechanisms and build experiences on top of that?
We can each use this in the way
(the most interesting content, directly about the internal-concept, is
at the end of this email)
On 04/05/2017 03:23 PM, Ryan McElroy wrote:
On 4/5/17 11:40 AM, Ryan McElroy wrote:
[…]
(3) Thanks to Pierre-Yves for the detailed analysis of verious
mechanisms for implementing internal-only
(important bit about how we -already- have a generic hiding API is at
the end of the email).
On 04/05/2017 04:06 PM, Ryan McElroy wrote:
On 4/5/17 12:06 PM, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
On 04/05/2017 03:11 AM, Durham Goode wrote:
I think we really needs to take a step back here. Before
# HG changeset patch
# User Alexander Fomin
# Date 1491430506 25200
# Wed Apr 05 15:15:06 2017 -0700
# Node ID bb06942306b27dfbbe554c307f82a5c6b08e0cae
# Parent 65969cd351b73228642d1e491e8c78b20d85405a
patch: make diff in git mode respect --text option (issue5510)
This
# HG changeset patch
# User Alexander Fomin
# Date 1491431909 25200
# Wed Apr 05 15:38:29 2017 -0700
# Node ID f3814cce4dda8e8090736f642b694ce7cd3792bb
# Parent 900f393807023064cb484e86e3ccffa6338b55bb
hg: make --binary option for git diffs default to off (BC)
This patch is
# HG changeset patch
# User Alexander Fomin
# Date 1491431468 25200
# Wed Apr 05 15:31:08 2017 -0700
# Node ID 900f393807023064cb484e86e3ccffa6338b55bb
# Parent bb06942306b27dfbbe554c307f82a5c6b08e0cae
hg: add --binary option for git mode diffs
This patch adds --binary
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Durham Goode wrote:
> On 4/5/17 4:06 AM, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
>>
>> On 04/05/2017 03:11 AM, Durham Goode wrote:
>>>
>>> There's been a lot of discussion about how to hide and unhide commits
>>> lately [0][1], and I feel the complexity of our
On 05/04/2017, 07:37, "Ryan McElroy" wrote:
>
> On 4/4/17 11:21 PM, Alexander Fomin wrote:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Alexander Fomin
> > # Date 1491342655 25200
> > # Tue Apr 04 14:50:55 2017 -0700
> > # Node ID 76f6cd23643c9816a688a1e12900a6856c5fabf6
On 4/5/17 4:06 AM, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
On 04/05/2017 03:11 AM, Durham Goode wrote:
There's been a lot of discussion about how to hide and unhide commits
lately [0][1], and I feel the complexity of our current approach is
hurting our ability to reason about it, making it impossible to make
Excerpts from Pierre-Yves David's message of 2017-04-05 13:28:57 +0200:
>
> On 04/04/2017 09:06 PM, Jun Wu wrote:
> > Since most people want a separate hidden storage that handles wider cases, I
> > don't think this incomplete (internal-only) solution worths investment.
>
> They seems to be
On 05/04/2017, 07:54, "Yuya Nishihara" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 15:37:46 +0100, Ryan McElroy wrote:
> > On 4/4/17 11:21 PM, Alexander Fomin wrote:
> > > # HG changeset patch
> > > # User Alexander Fomin
> > > # Date 1491335167
On 4/5/17 9:58 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:
*sigh* I was confused by the gmail/inbox default reply yet again. The
below was meant not just for Greg.
Doesn't really add much value at this point :-P
-- Forwarded message --
From: Martin von Zweigbergk
On 05/04/2017, 07:37, "Ryan McElroy" wrote:
>
> On 4/4/17 11:21 PM, Alexander Fomin wrote:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Alexander Fomin
> > # Date 1490992236 25200
> > # Fri Mar 31 13:30:36 2017 -0700
> > # Node ID 9be2b4ec19e846d2a95fe801ebe76f83fffd1ea9
I respond inline, but I'm also happy to drop discussion about
evolve-like user experience changes and instead focus on the proposal
about just making hidden commits a separate system. So we can discuss
the various topics incrementally.
On 4/5/17 3:23 AM, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
Summary
Excerpts from Pierre-Yves David's message of 2017-04-05 13:28:57 +0200:
>
> On 04/04/2017 09:06 PM, Jun Wu wrote:
> > Since most people want a separate hidden storage that handles wider cases, I
> > don't think this incomplete (internal-only) solution worths investment.
>
> They seems to be
I don't think "writing things that hook *may* need to filesystem" is a good
approach. It introduces unnecessary overhead if the hook does not need that
information.
I think a better way is to have per-hook config to let hooks explicitly
declare what they need, before we run them.
Excerpts from
On 4/5/17 13:30, Olivier Trempe wrote:
Absolutely. This will be fixed in V3.
I also realize the "import sys" statement was removed 3 months ago. I
missed it when rebasing... This will also be fixed in V3.
Thanks.
In general, do you think you could add a test for the behavior where
fsmonitor
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Pierre-Yves David
wrote:
>
>
> On 04/05/2017 05:17 PM, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 5, 2017 04:01, "Pierre-Yves David"
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
On 04/05/2017 05:17 PM, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:
On Apr 5, 2017 04:01, "Pierre-Yves David"
>
wrote:
On 04/05/2017 07:29 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Pierre-Yves
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Siddharth Agarwal
wrote:
>
> On 4/5/17 08:42, Olivier Trempe wrote:
>>
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Olivier Trempe
>> # Date 1488981822 18000
>> # Wed Mar 08 09:03:42 2017 -0500
>> # Branch stable
>> # Node
On 04/05/2017 09:27 PM, Augie Fackler wrote:
On Apr 4, 2017, at 07:09, Pierre-Yves David
wrote:
On 04/03/2017 10:50 PM, Augie Fackler wrote:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 05:03:42PM +0200, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Pierre-Yves David
19 new changesets in mercurial:
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg/rev/7d2cbe11ae48
changeset: 31774:7d2cbe11ae48
user:Yuya Nishihara
date:Wed Mar 29 21:13:55 2017 +0900
summary: pycompat: introduce identity function as a compat stub
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 12:56:54AM +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Yuya Nishihara
> # Date 1491320098 -32400
> # Wed Apr 05 00:34:58 2017 +0900
> # Node ID de8d9a4ba73002af9d2992a15e0a196c2fcaf217
> # Parent
*sigh* I was confused by the gmail/inbox default reply yet again. The
below was meant not just for Greg.
Doesn't really add much value at this point :-P
-- Forwarded message --
From: Martin von Zweigbergk
Date: Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:20 PM
Subject: Re:
On 05/04/2017 02:11, Durham Goode wrote:
There's been a lot of discussion about how to hide and unhide commits
lately [0][1], and I feel the complexity of our current approach is
hurting our ability to reason about it, making it impossible to make
progress.
I would like to formally propose a
> On Apr 4, 2017, at 07:09, Pierre-Yves David
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 04/03/2017 10:50 PM, Augie Fackler wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 05:03:42PM +0200, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
>>> # HG changeset patch
>>> # User Pierre-Yves David
13 new changesets in mercurial:
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg/rev/b044c339c06d
changeset: 31761:b044c339c06d
parent: 31758:04ec317b8128
user:Jun Wu
date:Wed Mar 29 14:45:01 2017 -0700
summary: verify: document corner cases
On 4/5/17 08:42, Olivier Trempe wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Olivier Trempe
# Date 1488981822 18000
# Wed Mar 08 09:03:42 2017 -0500
# Branch stable
# Node ID 2021c3032968bef6b8d1cd7bea5a22996ced994c
# Parent 68f263f52d2e3e2798b4f1e55cb665c6b043f93b
Excerpts from Pierre-Yves David's message of 2017-04-05 13:06:04 +0200:
> I think we really needs to take a step back here. Before thinking about
> unification, I think we needs a clean definition of what we are doing
> here. As mentioned in another thread[2], they are at least three
>
https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5525
Bug ID: 5525
Summary: New hg blame flag to show _current_ line number
Product: Mercurial
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
# HG changeset patch
# User Philippe Pepiot
# Date 1491391351 -7200
# Wed Apr 05 13:22:31 2017 +0200
# Node ID c0231296470330eeae91058b9a3d7a6785e16cbe
# Parent 04ec317b81280c189fcea33a05c8cbbac3c186b1
# Available At https://hg.logilab.org/users/ppepiot/hg
#
On 04/05/2017 04:10 PM, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
On Wed, 05 Apr 2017 14:11:37 +0200, Philippe Pepiot wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Philippe Pepiot
# Date 1491391351 -7200
# Wed Apr 05 13:22:31 2017 +0200
# Node ID 8bec80c135fb155b8d10679900f08661b7f4d06a
#
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 00:33:23 +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Apr 2017 00:29:08 -0700, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Gregory Szorc
> > # Date 1491021501 25200
> > # Fri Mar 31 21:38:21 2017 -0700
> > # Node ID
# HG changeset patch
# User Olivier Trempe
# Date 1488981822 18000
# Wed Mar 08 09:03:42 2017 -0500
# Branch stable
# Node ID 2021c3032968bef6b8d1cd7bea5a22996ced994c
# Parent 68f263f52d2e3e2798b4f1e55cb665c6b043f93b
fsmonitor: match watchman and filesystem encoding
On 4/5/17 3:59 PM, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 15:37:51 +0100, Ryan McElroy wrote:
On 4/4/17 11:21 PM, Alexander Fomin wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Alexander Fomin
# Date 1491342655 25200
# Tue Apr 04 14:50:55 2017 -0700
# Node ID
On Sat, 01 Apr 2017 00:29:08 -0700, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Gregory Szorc
> # Date 1491021501 25200
> # Fri Mar 31 21:38:21 2017 -0700
> # Node ID 0b8be3d244585f5a2874821418fce41bf7631f6c
> # Parent
On Apr 5, 2017 04:01, "Pierre-Yves David"
wrote:
On 04/05/2017 07:29 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Pierre-Yves David
> wrote:
>
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Pierre-Yves David
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 15:37:51 +0100, Ryan McElroy wrote:
> On 4/4/17 11:21 PM, Alexander Fomin wrote:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Alexander Fomin
> > # Date 1491342655 25200
> > # Tue Apr 04 14:50:55 2017 -0700
> > # Node ID 76f6cd23643c9816a688a1e12900a6856c5fabf6
> > #
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 15:21:21 -0700, Alexander Fomin wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Alexander Fomin
> # Date 1491334100 25200
> # Tue Apr 04 12:28:20 2017 -0700
> # Node ID 27515c7e38db9d93e18b7df13149da7c0d88eeb2
> # Parent 9be2b4ec19e846d2a95fe801ebe76f83fffd1ea9
>
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 15:37:46 +0100, Ryan McElroy wrote:
> On 4/4/17 11:21 PM, Alexander Fomin wrote:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Alexander Fomin
> > # Date 1491335167 25200
> > # Tue Apr 04 12:46:07 2017 -0700
> > # Node ID 373acf7da1a621607a1cc062b96ad67a42a7e016
> > #
On 4/4/17 11:21 PM, Alexander Fomin wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Alexander Fomin
# Date 1491342655 25200
# Tue Apr 04 14:50:55 2017 -0700
# Node ID 76f6cd23643c9816a688a1e12900a6856c5fabf6
# Parent 373acf7da1a621607a1cc062b96ad67a42a7e016
hg: make --binary option for
On 4/4/17 11:21 PM, Alexander Fomin wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Alexander Fomin
# Date 1490992236 25200
# Fri Mar 31 13:30:36 2017 -0700
# Node ID 9be2b4ec19e846d2a95fe801ebe76f83fffd1ea9
# Parent 65969cd351b73228642d1e491e8c78b20d85405a
patch: make diff in Git mode
On 4/4/17 11:21 PM, Alexander Fomin wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Alexander Fomin
# Date 1491335167 25200
# Tue Apr 04 12:46:07 2017 -0700
# Node ID 373acf7da1a621607a1cc062b96ad67a42a7e016
# Parent 27515c7e38db9d93e18b7df13149da7c0d88eeb2
tests: add tests for --binary
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 16:54:22 +0200, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Pierre-Yves David
> # Date 1491317338 -7200
> # Tue Apr 04 16:48:58 2017 +0200
> # Node ID 1efd0a70a0c9a185d3f6de6030a37608a9a8dbd5
> # Parent
On Wed, 05 Apr 2017 14:11:37 +0200, Philippe Pepiot wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Philippe Pepiot
> # Date 1491391351 -7200
> # Wed Apr 05 13:22:31 2017 +0200
> # Node ID 8bec80c135fb155b8d10679900f08661b7f4d06a
> # Parent
On 4/5/17 12:06 PM, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
On 04/05/2017 03:11 AM, Durham Goode wrote:
There's been a lot of discussion about how to hide and unhide commits
lately [0][1], and I feel the complexity of our current approach is
hurting our ability to reason about it, making it impossible to make
> On Apr 5, 2017, at 10:01, Ryan McElroy wrote:
>
> Side-note: +1 on Simon's request to put the doc onto the wiki as a plan.
In general, +1 on wiki pages, but only after the potential for a storm of
comments has dwindled: discussion in doc comments is significantly less painful
On 4/5/17 5:29 AM, Durham Goode wrote:
On 4/4/17 8:58 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Durham Goode > wrote:
There's been a lot of discussion about how to hide and unhide
commits lately [0][1], and I feel the
On 4/5/17 11:23 AM, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
Summary
---
I think we need to take an extra step back in the current discussion.
We seems be get slowly lost in a sub branch of evolution design,
discussing sub-concerns with a partial view of the big picture.
I agree. Overall, my feeling is
On 4/5/17 11:40 AM, Ryan McElroy wrote:
On 4/4/17 9:07 PM, Martin von Zweigbergk via Mercurial-devel wrote:
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Jun Wu wrote:
Since most people want a separate hidden storage that handles wider
cases, I
don't think this incomplete (internal-only)
https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5524
Bug ID: 5524
Summary: Abort during convertion
Product: Mercurial
Version: 4.1.2
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: bug
https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5523
Bug ID: 5523
Summary: renamed subrepos cause "repository X not found"
warnings running hg verify
Product: Mercurial
Version: 4.0
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
# HG changeset patch
# User Philippe Pepiot
# Date 1491391351 -7200
# Wed Apr 05 13:22:31 2017 +0200
# Node ID 8bec80c135fb155b8d10679900f08661b7f4d06a
# Parent 04ec317b81280c189fcea33a05c8cbbac3c186b1
# Available At https://hg.logilab.org/users/ppepiot/hg
#
On 04/04/2017 09:06 PM, Jun Wu wrote:
Since most people want a separate hidden storage that handles wider cases, I
don't think this incomplete (internal-only) solution worths investment.
They seems to be misunderstanding here. We should probably jump on a
Face to Face medium
What I've
On 04/05/2017 03:11 AM, Durham Goode wrote:
There's been a lot of discussion about how to hide and unhide commits
lately [0][1], and I feel the complexity of our current approach is
hurting our ability to reason about it, making it impossible to make
progress.
I would like to formally propose a
On 04/05/2017 07:29 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Pierre-Yves David
wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Pierre-Yves David
# Date 1491225382 -7200
# Mon Apr 03 15:16:22 2017 +0200
# Node ID
On 4/4/17 9:07 PM, Martin von Zweigbergk via Mercurial-devel wrote:
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Jun Wu wrote:
Since most people want a separate hidden storage that handles wider cases, I
don't think this incomplete (internal-only) solution worths investment.
I can't say
Summary
---
I think we need to take an extra step back in the current discussion. We
seems be get slowly lost in a sub branch of evolution design, discussing
sub-concerns with a partial view of the big picture.
Currently Evolution has:
* an overall consistent design,
* a planned final UI
https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5522
Bug ID: 5522
Summary: merge reports invalid nothing to merge
Product: Mercurial
Version: 4.1.2
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: bug
63 matches
Mail list logo