krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Queued, thanks.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3437
To: indygreg, #hg-reviewers, krbullock
Cc: krbullock, mercurial-devel
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Queued, thanks.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3436
To: indygreg, #hg-reviewers, krbullock
Cc: krbullock, mercurial-devel
krbullock requested changes to this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Looks like a couple unresolved comments on _possibledestination, plus one
nitpick. I think we can clean those things up easily and then land this though.
INLINE COMMENTS
>
krbullock added a comment.
Oh sorry, I see you're already on the case. Carry on!
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2394
To: sangeet259, durin42, #hg-reviewers
Cc: krbullock, rishabhmadan96, mercurial-devel
krbullock added a comment.
Can we get some test coverage on this?
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2394
To: sangeet259, durin42, #hg-reviewers
Cc: krbullock, rishabhmadan96, mercurial-devel
___
krbullock added a comment.
@durin42 Go for it
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1808
To: spectral, #hg-reviewers, krbullock
Cc: durin42, krbullock, mercurial-devel
___
Mercurial-devel mailing list
krbullock added a comment.
What would be the advantage of taking this? Since we already have the C
implementation, it's not likely to gain us any performance. On the other hand,
it might make a good test case for integrating Rust and Python, finding the
right API boundaries and
krbullock accepted this revision as: krbullock.
krbullock added a comment.
This LGTM now. I think the executable as interpreted by shlex, but without
the added flags, gives enough signal for the user to figure out what might be
wrong without confusing things.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
krbullock requested changes to this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
This has new failures in test-obshistory.t and test-directaccess.t, can you
rebase?
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1591
To:
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Queued, thanks
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1809
To: spectral, #hg-reviewers, krbullock
Cc: krbullock, mercurial-devel
krbullock requested changes to this revision.
krbullock added inline comments.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
INLINE COMMENTS
> debugcommands.py:1212
> fm.write('editor', _("checking commit editor... (%s)\n"), editor)
> -cmdpath =
krbullock requested changes to this revision.
krbullock added inline comments.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
INLINE COMMENTS
> githelp.py:883
> +cmd = Command('status')
> cmd['--change'] = 'tip'
> else:
I don't think `tip` is correct here,
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
Queued, thanks
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1591
To: lothiraldan, #hg-reviewers, durin42, pulkit, krbullock
Cc: krbullock, pulkit, durin42, mercurial-devel
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Sure, queued.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1745
To: phillco, #hg-reviewers, krbullock
Cc: krbullock, mercurial-devel
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Sure, queued.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1720
To: spectral, #hg-reviewers, krbullock
Cc: krbullock, mercurial-devel
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Seems reasonable.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1719
To: spectral, #hg-reviewers, krbullock
Cc: krbullock, quark, mercurial-devel
krbullock requested changes to this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
One nit, otherwise looks nice!
INLINE COMMENTS
> obsutil.py:780
> +else:
> +return 'superseed_split'
> +
These should be 'superseded' and
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Whoops, queued, thanks.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1718
To: wlis, #hg-reviewers, krbullock
Cc: krbullock, mercurial-devel
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Queued per Matt's review, thanks.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1717
To: quark, #hg-reviewers, mharbison72, krbullock
Cc: krbullock,
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM, thanks.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1713
To: durin42, #hg-reviewers, krbullock
Cc: krbullock, mercurial-devel
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM, thanks.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1710
To: durin42, #hg-reviewers, krbullock
Cc: krbullock, mercurial-devel
krbullock added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> copies.py:206
> +return _chain(a, b, cm, _dirstatecopies(b, match))
> +else:
> +return _committedforwardcopies(a, b, match)
Post-queue nitpick: unnecessary `else:`.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
krbullock added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> debugcommands.py:747
> opts = pycompat.byteskwargs(opts)
> -remoteurl, branches = hg.parseurl(ui.expandpath(remoteurl),
> - opts.get('branch'))
> +remoteurl, branches =
krbullock added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> rebase.py:393
> +def _performrebase(self, tr):
> +self._assignworkingcopy()
> +repo, ui = self.repo, self.ui
Rather than having this method spookily set self.wctx, why not make
`_assignworkingcopy` _return_ the wctx (and
krbullock requested changes to this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
This doesn't apply cleanly. Can you rebase?
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1607
To: pulkit, #hg-reviewers, krbullock
Cc:
krbullock requested changes to this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Looks okay to me except for Augie's nit. @indygreg ?
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1457
To: wlis, #hg-reviewers, indygreg,
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1605
To: durin42, #hg-reviewers, pulkit, krbullock
Cc: krbullock, pulkit, mercurial-devel
krbullock added a comment.
@quark @martinvonz Ping
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1063
To: quark, #hg-reviewers, durin42
Cc: krbullock, dlax, martinvonz, durin42, mercurial-devel
___
Mercurial-devel
krbullock added a comment.
Code LGTM, but I haven't done any performance testing on this.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1224
To: mbthomas, #hg-reviewers
Cc: krbullock, mercurial-devel
___
krbullock added a comment.
If this mitigates or fixes issue5716, please mention it in the summary line.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1224
To: mbthomas, #hg-reviewers
Cc: krbullock, mercurial-devel
krbullock added subscribers: durham, krbullock.
krbullock accepted this revision as: krbullock.
krbullock added a comment.
LGTM but I'd like someone with more familiarity with dirstate to have a look
too. Maybe @durham ?
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
krbullock added a comment.
Deferring this until after 4.4, because the added `markers` argument isn't
used yet.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1191
To: lothiraldan, #hg-reviewers, krbullock
Cc: krbullock, mercurial-devel
krbullock added a subscriber: yuja.
krbullock added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> ryanmce wrote in filemerge.py:755-756
> I followed the pattern seen elsewhere in this file.
>
> If you just hit enter, you do get the default, though.
>
> I can follow-up with a patch to fix all of these
krbullock requested changes to this revision.
krbullock added inline comments.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
INLINE COMMENTS
> templater.py:1011
> """Compute obsfate related information based on successors
> (EXPERIMENTAL)"""
> -if len(args) != 1:
> +if len(args)
krbullock added a comment.
We're dropping this stack from 4.4 because it caused unexpected behavior
changes in python-hglib
(https://buildbot.mercurial-scm.org/builders/python-hglib/builds/654) and
elsewhere. Seems to stem from recomputing from the same set on repeated calls
to
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1196
To: durin42, #hg-reviewers, krbullock
Cc: krbullock, mercurial-devel
krbullock added a comment.
Sure, queued.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D956
To: durin42, #hg-reviewers
Cc: krbullock, mercurial-devel
___
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
krbullock added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> test-merge-halt.t:24
> + $ echo onfailure=continue >> $HGRCPATH
> + $ hg rebase -s 1 -d 2 --tool false
> + rebasing 1:1f28a51c3c9b "c"
Why test this with rebase instead of merge?
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
krbullock requested changes to this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
I was initially confused by the description of this change, because the user
can already halt (by configuration) after the first failed file merge. But this
introduces a
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Queued, thanks.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D915
To: singhsrb, #hg-reviewers, krbullock
Cc: krbullock, quark, mercurial-devel
krbullock requested changes to this revision.
krbullock added inline comments.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
INLINE COMMENTS
> mbthomas wrote in merge.py:1739-1743
> I'm not sure if we're planning to work towards PEP8, but it (and I) prefer
> using parentheses to break long if
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Queued these, thanks.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D860
To: durin42, #hg-reviewers, krbullock
Cc: krbullock, mercurial-devel
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Queued these, thanks.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D833
To: indygreg, #hg-reviewers, krbullock
Cc: krbullock, mercurial-devel
krbullock added a comment.
Queued for stable, thanks.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D743
To: mbthomas, #hg-reviewers, durin42, krbullock
Cc: durin42, mercurial-devel
___
Mercurial-devel mailing list
krbullock accepted this revision as: krbullock.
krbullock added a comment.
LGTM, but leaving it for others to review because I know this was a subject
of IRC discussion recently.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D726
To: pulkit, #hg-reviewers,
krbullock requested changes to this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
I think either expanding the docs or using constants would be fine, but the
default weight looks like it's 1, not 10.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
krbullock requested changes to this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Flagging for revision per Augie's open question.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D614
To: pulkit, #hg-reviewers, durham,
krbullock requested changes to this revision.
krbullock added inline comments.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
INLINE COMMENTS
> releasenotes.py:556-575
> +along with the changeset ID. For example::
> +
> + .. abcd::
> +
> + First paragraph under this admonition
krbullock added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> martinvonz wrote in bundlerepo.py:322
> I think we usually use a "fn" prefix for function arguments. I think "readfn"
> would be clearer.
I agree, but as it is, this is simple code movement. Usually we like renames to
be done in separate
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
Looks good, queued!
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D368
To: rishabhmadan96, #hg-reviewers, durin42, krbullock
Cc: krbullock, quark, durin42, mercurial-devel
krbullock added a comment.
These all look like they're heading the right direction, but I'm not prepared
to land them in 4.3-rc. Let's revisit after the freeze.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D127
EMAIL PREFERENCES
krbullock added a comment.
I like this, but I'd rather not take it right before a freeze. Can we revisit
this for 4.4?
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D119
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To:
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Queued, thanks.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D117
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Queued, thanks.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D118
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Queued, thanks.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D114
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Queued, thanks.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D116
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
krbullock accepted this revision.
krbullock added a comment.
Queued, thanks.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D35
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: quark, durin42, phillco, krbullock
Cc:
57 matches
Mail list logo