On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 06:49:45PM +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Aug 2016 23:04:06 +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> >> Well you're using TIMEIT to do GC benchmarks - it's a terrible
> >> idea, ever,
Well, seems the comment is out of date. I know the issue - the GC got
triggered every X objects in 2.6, which caused O(n^2) performance when
allocating lots of objects. These days (since 2.7) it adapts the
threshold, which means it always amortizes to O(n).
Either way, I don't care if we disable