On 3/2/17 11:55 AM, Augie Fackler wrote:
On Mar 2, 2017, at 12:37 PM, Durham Goode wrote:
On 3/2/17 8:09 AM, Ryan McElroy wrote:
On 3/2/17 7:46 AM, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:55:25 -0800, Jun Wu wrote:
According to
> On Mar 2, 2017, at 12:37 PM, Durham Goode wrote:
>
> On 3/2/17 8:09 AM, Ryan McElroy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/2/17 7:46 AM, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
>>> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:55:25 -0800, Jun Wu wrote:
According to
On 3/2/17 8:09 AM, Ryan McElroy wrote:
On 3/2/17 7:46 AM, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:55:25 -0800, Jun Wu wrote:
According to
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:55:25 -0800, Jun Wu wrote:
> According to https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4546:
>
> Testing with mercurial 3.2 and 3.3 to a Linux samba server worked without
> issue in the few tests I've done. This suggests the most likely cause is
> an NTFS/Windows
According to https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4546:
Testing with mercurial 3.2 and 3.3 to a Linux samba server worked without
issue in the few tests I've done. This suggests the most likely cause is
an NTFS/Windows based file server?
So I think at least we can have a whitelist
Augie Fackler writes:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 01:31:02AM -0800, Jeroen Vaelen wrote:
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Jeroen Vaelen
>> # Date 1487064458 28800
>> # Tue Feb 14 01:27:38 2017 -0800
>> # Node ID c7fb7ac39a12c8683518bb7db7e1a93346e017e0
>> #
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 20:34:32 +, Jeroen Vaelen wrote:
> Confidence in stable posix implementations could come from:
>
> - hardlink backups being the default for nearly 10 years before the previously
> mentioned patch disabled them after a series of bug reports coming
> exclusively from
Sorry for the delay in reply.
Confidence in stable posix implementations could come from:
- hardlink backups being the default for nearly 10 years before the previously
mentioned patch disabled them after a series of bug reports coming
exclusively from Windows users.
- generally more
Augie Fackler wrote:
> I'm hesitant to take this because as of 10.12 macOS is pushing people
> towards CIFS instead of AFP,
Interesting
> so this issue feels more likely to come up there.
> Also, isn't it possible to mount CIFS volumes in the filesystem space on
> Linux?
I was going to
# HG changeset patch
# User Jeroen Vaelen
# Date 1487064458 28800
# Tue Feb 14 01:27:38 2017 -0800
# Node ID c7fb7ac39a12c8683518bb7db7e1a93346e017e0
# Parent a0e3d808690d57d1c9dff840e0b8ee099526397b
transaction: enable hardlink backups for non-windows systems
07a92bbd02e5
10 matches
Mail list logo