Re: [PATCH] transaction: enable hardlink backups for non-windows systems

2017-03-02 Thread Durham Goode
On 3/2/17 11:55 AM, Augie Fackler wrote: On Mar 2, 2017, at 12:37 PM, Durham Goode wrote: On 3/2/17 8:09 AM, Ryan McElroy wrote: On 3/2/17 7:46 AM, Yuya Nishihara wrote: On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:55:25 -0800, Jun Wu wrote: According to

Re: [PATCH] transaction: enable hardlink backups for non-windows systems

2017-03-02 Thread Augie Fackler
> On Mar 2, 2017, at 12:37 PM, Durham Goode wrote: > > On 3/2/17 8:09 AM, Ryan McElroy wrote: >> >> >> On 3/2/17 7:46 AM, Yuya Nishihara wrote: >>> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:55:25 -0800, Jun Wu wrote: According to

Re: [PATCH] transaction: enable hardlink backups for non-windows systems

2017-03-02 Thread Durham Goode
On 3/2/17 8:09 AM, Ryan McElroy wrote: On 3/2/17 7:46 AM, Yuya Nishihara wrote: On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:55:25 -0800, Jun Wu wrote: According to

Re: [PATCH] transaction: enable hardlink backups for non-windows systems

2017-03-02 Thread Yuya Nishihara
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:55:25 -0800, Jun Wu wrote: > According to https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4546: > > Testing with mercurial 3.2 and 3.3 to a Linux samba server worked without > issue in the few tests I've done. This suggests the most likely cause is > an NTFS/Windows

Re: [PATCH] transaction: enable hardlink backups for non-windows systems

2017-03-01 Thread Jun Wu
According to https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4546: Testing with mercurial 3.2 and 3.3 to a Linux samba server worked without issue in the few tests I've done. This suggests the most likely cause is an NTFS/Windows based file server? So I think at least we can have a whitelist

Re: [PATCH] transaction: enable hardlink backups for non-windows systems

2017-02-21 Thread Sean Farley
Augie Fackler writes: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 01:31:02AM -0800, Jeroen Vaelen wrote: >> # HG changeset patch >> # User Jeroen Vaelen >> # Date 1487064458 28800 >> # Tue Feb 14 01:27:38 2017 -0800 >> # Node ID c7fb7ac39a12c8683518bb7db7e1a93346e017e0 >> #

Re: [PATCH] transaction: enable hardlink backups for non-windows systems

2017-02-17 Thread Yuya Nishihara
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 20:34:32 +, Jeroen Vaelen wrote: > Confidence in stable posix implementations could come from: > > - hardlink backups being the default for nearly 10 years before the previously > mentioned patch disabled them after a series of bug reports coming > exclusively from

Re: [PATCH] transaction: enable hardlink backups for non-windows systems

2017-02-15 Thread Jeroen Vaelen
Sorry for the delay in reply. Confidence in stable posix implementations could come from: - hardlink backups being the default for nearly 10 years before the previously mentioned patch disabled them after a series of bug reports coming exclusively from Windows users. - generally more

Re: [PATCH] transaction: enable hardlink backups for non-windows systems

2017-02-14 Thread timeless
Augie Fackler wrote: > I'm hesitant to take this because as of 10.12 macOS is pushing people > towards CIFS instead of AFP, Interesting > so this issue feels more likely to come up there. > Also, isn't it possible to mount CIFS volumes in the filesystem space on > Linux? I was going to

[PATCH] transaction: enable hardlink backups for non-windows systems

2017-02-14 Thread Jeroen Vaelen
# HG changeset patch # User Jeroen Vaelen # Date 1487064458 28800 # Tue Feb 14 01:27:38 2017 -0800 # Node ID c7fb7ac39a12c8683518bb7db7e1a93346e017e0 # Parent a0e3d808690d57d1c9dff840e0b8ee099526397b transaction: enable hardlink backups for non-windows systems 07a92bbd02e5