Excerpts from Danek Duvall's message of 2017-02-16 10:27:58 -0800:
> Or both? Would it be useful consider one to be primary and the other
> secondary, and to always test only a subset of networking-related tests on
> the secondary if it's available? Running the entire testsuite twice just
> to ma
Jun Wu wrote:
> With all the changes, it'll be easy to switch between v4 and v6 (by changing
> "useipv6" in run-tests.py). I think we can add a new command line flag to
> run-tests.py so people can choose whether they want to test v4 or v6.
Or both? Would it be useful consider one to be primary
Excerpts from Danek Duvall's message of 2017-02-16 09:51:14 -0800:
> Jun Wu wrote:
>
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Jun Wu
> > # Date 1487221422 28800
> > # Wed Feb 15 21:03:42 2017 -0800
> > # Node ID f2743873dfbd6adedcd3aa1777b651ce5bd6f6ed
> > # Parent a70e11929c63cd9245812f3db8091a
Jun Wu wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Jun Wu
> # Date 1487221422 28800
> # Wed Feb 15 21:03:42 2017 -0800
> # Node ID f2743873dfbd6adedcd3aa1777b651ce5bd6f6ed
> # Parent a70e11929c63cd9245812f3db8091a449cd1273e
> # Available At https://bitbucket.org/quark-zju/hg-draft
> #
# HG changeset patch
# User Jun Wu
# Date 1487221422 28800
# Wed Feb 15 21:03:42 2017 -0800
# Node ID f2743873dfbd6adedcd3aa1777b651ce5bd6f6ed
# Parent a70e11929c63cd9245812f3db8091a449cd1273e
# Available At https://bitbucket.org/quark-zju/hg-draft
# hg pull https://bitbucket.or
