On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:05:00 -0800, Jun Wu wrote:
> Excerpts from Yuya Nishihara's message of 2017-02-14 22:49:34 +0900:
> > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:46:21 -0800, Jun Wu wrote:
> > > Excerpts from Yuya Nishihara's message of 2017-02-13 23:00:25 +0900:
> > > > Why not os.pipe()?
> > > >
> > > > We
Excerpts from Yuya Nishihara's message of 2017-02-14 22:49:34 +0900:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:46:21 -0800, Jun Wu wrote:
> > Excerpts from Yuya Nishihara's message of 2017-02-13 23:00:25 +0900:
> > > Why not os.pipe()?
> > >
> > > We share the same (dup-ed) file descriptors. In this case, the
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:46:21 -0800, Jun Wu wrote:
> Excerpts from Yuya Nishihara's message of 2017-02-13 23:00:25 +0900:
> > Why not os.pipe()?
> >
> > We share the same (dup-ed) file descriptors. In this case, the write end can
> > be used by many forked processes, but IIRC the read end can't.
Excerpts from Yuya Nishihara's message of 2017-02-13 23:00:25 +0900:
> Why not os.pipe()?
>
> We share the same (dup-ed) file descriptors. In this case, the write end can
> be used by many forked processes, but IIRC the read end can't. Only one
> reader can read out a message. So I think there's
# HG changeset patch
# User Jun Wu
# Date 1486601798 28800
# Wed Feb 08 16:56:38 2017 -0800
# Node ID 8410c4a6703bed4b459cf8d62bd32fdcb1e7
# Parent 138f7ba58a70de9610713b8bd55d1ba0ac468fa6
# Available At https://bitbucket.org/quark-zju/hg-draft
# hg pull