On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 02:04:44PM +0200, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
>
>
> On 03/27/2017 12:31 PM, Jun Wu wrote:
> > Excerpts from Pierre-Yves David's message of 2017-03-27 09:19:52 +0200:
> > >
> > > On 03/26/2017 08:42 PM, Jun Wu wrote:
> > > > Excerpts from Jun Wu's message of 2017-03-26 09:59:43
On 03/27/2017 12:31 PM, Jun Wu wrote:
Excerpts from Pierre-Yves David's message of 2017-03-27 09:19:52 +0200:
On 03/26/2017 08:42 PM, Jun Wu wrote:
Excerpts from Jun Wu's message of 2017-03-26 09:59:43 -0700:
I'm -1 on this series.
If the goal is to workaround obsolete cycles, the code
Excerpts from Pierre-Yves David's message of 2017-03-27 09:19:52 +0200:
>
> On 03/26/2017 08:42 PM, Jun Wu wrote:
> > Excerpts from Jun Wu's message of 2017-03-26 09:59:43 -0700:
> >> I'm -1 on this series.
> >>
> >> If the goal is to workaround obsolete cycles, the code could do additional
> >>
I'm -1 on this series.
If the goal is to workaround obsolete cycles, the code could do additional
checks "if the destination is obsoleted" and do "hg touch"-like thing
automatically.
That workaround will be no longer necessary if my obsolete cycle patches are
landed.
Internally, we have several