Re: [PATCH 5 of 6] rebase: demonstrate behavior with requiredest and pull --rebase

2017-03-29 Thread Jun Wu
Excerpts from Ryan McElroy's message of 2017-03-29 11:38:00 +0100: > drawdag.py I think you mean? > > I suppose a nice thing about drawdag is that you see the dag being > created so its more obvious what's going on without graph logs, but is > it worth a re-send do you think? These tests are

Re: [PATCH 5 of 6] rebase: demonstrate behavior with requiredest and pull --rebase

2017-03-29 Thread Ryan McElroy
On 3/28/17 10:35 PM, Jun Wu wrote: Excerpts from Ryan McElroy's message of 2017-03-28 14:31:14 -0700: # HG changeset patch # User Ryan McElroy # Date 1490735116 25200 # Tue Mar 28 14:05:16 2017 -0700 # Node ID cdf33d63e89377abd6f48ba6d4548a3b3f4af3e2 # Parent

Re: [PATCH 5 of 6] rebase: demonstrate behavior with requiredest and pull --rebase

2017-03-28 Thread Jun Wu
Excerpts from Ryan McElroy's message of 2017-03-28 14:31:14 -0700: > # HG changeset patch > # User Ryan McElroy > # Date 1490735116 25200 > # Tue Mar 28 14:05:16 2017 -0700 > # Node ID cdf33d63e89377abd6f48ba6d4548a3b3f4af3e2 > # Parent

[PATCH 5 of 6] rebase: demonstrate behavior with requiredest and pull --rebase

2017-03-28 Thread Ryan McElroy
# HG changeset patch # User Ryan McElroy # Date 1490735116 25200 # Tue Mar 28 14:05:16 2017 -0700 # Node ID cdf33d63e89377abd6f48ba6d4548a3b3f4af3e2 # Parent ac6634fab80b59ba48958ca03289c4434e9483c4 rebase: demonstrate behavior with requiredest and pull --rebase diff --git