On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 02:47:26AM -0800, Kostia Balytskyi wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Kostia Balytskyi
> # Date 1484824655 28800
> # Thu Jan 19 03:17:35 2017 -0800
> # Node ID 19a449c91ef14e691cf1347748473e0094fedc86
> # Parent
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 02:47:26AM -0800, Kostia Balytskyi wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Kostia Balytskyi
> # Date 1484824655 28800
> # Thu Jan 19 03:17:35 2017 -0800
> # Node ID 19a449c91ef14e691cf1347748473e0094fedc86
> # Parent
On 13/02/2017 21:58, Jun Wu wrote:
> As said before, I still prefer a simpler design without the "required"
> boolean flag, and move the responsibility of checking requirements to the
> higher-level code. Because:
>
>- As Yuya pointed out at the first place, "required" here will have
>
As said before, I still prefer a simpler design without the "required"
boolean flag, and move the responsibility of checking requirements to the
higher-level code. Because:
- As Yuya pointed out at the first place, "required" here will have
trouble dealing with future schema changes. So
# HG changeset patch
# User Kostia Balytskyi
# Date 1484824655 28800
# Thu Jan 19 03:17:35 2017 -0800
# Node ID 19a449c91ef14e691cf1347748473e0094fedc86
# Parent 9f264adbe75bfae8551dc0e6e0fce8d43fc7b43a
scmutil: add a simple key-value file helper
The purpose of the added