khanchi97 added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3764#59797, @pulkit wrote:
> @khanchi97 you should have created a new differential so that we don't
loose your earlier patch titled: 'rebase: improve output of --dry-run' which is
yet under review.
Oh sorry, it was by
pulkit added a comment.
@khanchi97 you should have created a new differential so that we don't loose
your earlier patch titled: 'rebase: improve output of --dry-run' which is yet
under review.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3764
To: khanchi97,
pulkit added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3764#59443, @indygreg wrote:
> In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3764#59425, @pulkit wrote:
>
> > Thinking out loud here: I see that `--dry-run` for rebase will be very
useful for automation. How about returning 1 when there
khanchi97 updated this revision to Diff 9258.
khanchi97 edited the summary of this revision.
khanchi97 retitled this revision from "rebase: improve output of --dry-run" to
"rebase: no need to store backup during dry-run while aborting".
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
