lothiraldan abandoned this revision.
lothiraldan added a comment.
I've started splitting the configuration, need to finish it before the
freeze. As the stack will be unrelated to https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D761
and https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D762, I think we can close this stack.
REP
durin42 added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D761#13848, @lothiraldan wrote:
> @durin42 Good for me, I don't have strong opinion on the matter. I will
have a patch ready for the sprint.
What's the story with this revision? Should we close it and
https://phab.mercuri
lothiraldan added a comment.
@durin42 Good for me, I don't have strong opinion on the matter. I will have
a patch ready for the sprint.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D761
To: lothiraldan, #hg-reviewers, pulkit, quark
Cc: durin42, quark, pulkit,
durin42 added a comment.
I would bias towards just having one change that advances to using
`[experimental]` if we want to rename this again. I don't think we need to take
the rollback-then-forward approach, seems like unnecessary ceremony. Let's just
talk this over at the sprint?
REPOSITOR
lothiraldan added a comment.
Sorry for the lag, I was at a conference.
I didn't planned for such changes, but I think it's a very good idea! I'm
gonna send patches soon. Do you think I should start a new series of patch or
add new patch on top of the backout?
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
durin42 added a comment.
I concur with @quark: if we're going to bother renaming this again, we should
just use the `[experimental]` namespace.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D761
To: lothiraldan, #hg-reviewers, pulkit, quark
Cc: durin42, quark,
quark requested changes to this revision.
quark added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Although "stabilization" may be controversial, but I don't think "evolution"
is a strictly better than that.
I think it makes more sense to split the giant config into different
pulkit accepted this revision.
pulkit added a comment.
The evolution config name makes sense. stabilization was ambiguous.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D761
To: lothiraldan, #hg-reviewers, pulkit
Cc: pulkit, mercurial-devel
_
lothiraldan created this revision.
Herald added a subscriber: mercurial-devel.
Herald added a reviewer: hg-reviewers.
REVISION SUMMARY
The concept is still call "Changeset Evolution". The "troubles" got renamed to
"instability", so the action can be renamed from "evolve troubles" to
"stabili