Re: Internal-changeset concept (was: re: [PATCH RFC] repo: add an ability to hide nodes in an appropriate way)

2017-04-01 Thread Jun Wu
IIRC at the sprint that people tend to agree on root based hidden separated from phase root. I was about to ask questions about "strip", and some "obsstore" interaction, but I think the main focus should be in the obsstore thread. So I'd not distract you here. See inline comments, mainly about re

Internal-changeset concept (was: re: [PATCH RFC] repo: add an ability to hide nodes in an appropriate way)

2017-03-31 Thread Pierre-Yves David
[And here is the actual reply, sorry for the initial misstep] On 03/30/2017 07:08 PM, Ryan McElroy wrote: On 3/30/17 3:15 PM, Pierre-Yves David wrote: […] I hope this long message help to clarify various concept. We have way forward to reduce the use of stripping without abusing the obsolescenc

Internal-changeset concept (was: re: [PATCH RFC] repo: add an ability to hide nodes in an appropriate way)

2017-03-31 Thread Pierre-Yves David
On 03/30/2017 07:08 PM, Ryan McElroy wrote: On 3/30/17 3:15 PM, Pierre-Yves David wrote: […] I hope this long message help to clarify various concept. We have way forward to reduce the use of stripping without abusing the obsolescence concept in a way that will create issue for users. These wa