On 05/08/2020 10.47, Pulkit Goyal wrote:
Oops, if possible can you email a patch for this. The website
repository lives at https://www.mercurial-scm.org/repo/hg-website/.
Like that?
# HG changeset patch
# User Marcus Harnisch
# Date 1596620149 -7200
# Wed Aug 05 11:35:49 2020 +0200
#
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 1:55 PM Marcus Harnisch wrote:
>
> On 25/07/2020 10.11, David Demelier wrote:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User David Demelier
> > # Date 1595664656 -7200
> > # Sat Jul 25 10:10:56 2020 +0200
> > # Node ID 7eaad1ed8c743d40fe71620434f3a151f0067105
> > # Parent
On 25/07/2020 10.11, David Demelier wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User David Demelier
# Date 1595664656 -7200
# Sat Jul 25 10:10:56 2020 +0200
# Node ID 7eaad1ed8c743d40fe71620434f3a151f0067105
# Parent b0e3c6141a7844e1fdd55535677ea3bfb1527707
who: remove OpenJDK
They unfortunately moved
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 18:30:57 +0200, Antonio Muci wrote:
> > Il 31/07/2020 17:55 Pierre-Yves David ha
> > scritto:
...
> > Moving to a modern Mercurial version, using sparse revlog for storage
> > and recomputing delta gave a massive boost to storage size and clone
> > performance.
>
> At
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 06:30:57PM +0200, Antonio Muci via Mercurial-devel
wrote:
> What concerns me the most are two things:
>
> 1. scripta manent: when in some years people will google for "mercurial
> performance" they will stumble upon JDK considerations, and take them
> form granted. What
On 7/31/20 6:30 PM, Antonio Muci wrote:
I am wondering if the countermeasures to this have to be only technical. I see
this more as a communication disadvantage compared to the git ecosystem.
We could definitely use more communication :-/
--
Pierre-Yves David
> Il 31/07/2020 17:55 Pierre-Yves David ha
> scritto:
>
> I got int touch with the OpenJDK people one and half year ago. [...]
Very active move on your part. Kudos.
> Moving to a modern Mercurial version, using sparse revlog for storage
> and recomputing delta gave a massive boost to storage
On 7/25/20 7:36 PM, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 12:27:42 +0200, Antonio Muci via Mercurial-devel wrote:
That's sad.
Yeah.
This motivated me enough to clone the repos (hg and git) and collect some
data. Maybe people here will find it useful.
I got int touch with the
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 10:19 PM Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 01:36:32PM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > First off, the clone itself. I cloned it from the official upstream repos.
> > My internet connection is 150 Mbit/s, the storage is a 3-way ZFS mirror. I
> >
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 18:35:03 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 11:12:25AM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > > > I'm guessing that they would have benefited from treemanifest.
> > >
> > > From my testing, treemanifests don't help at all.
> >
> > They seemed to help
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 11:12:25AM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > > I'm guessing that they would have benefited from treemanifest.
> >
> > From my testing, treemanifests don't help at all.
>
> They seemed to help with the jdk repo. I'm guessing that jdk has a deeper
> nested directories
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 04:11:06 +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 01:36:32PM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > First off, the clone itself. I cloned it from the official upstream repos.
> > My internet connection is 150 Mbit/s, the storage is a 3-way ZFS mirror. I
>
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 01:36:32PM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> First off, the clone itself. I cloned it from the official upstream repos.
> My internet connection is 150 Mbit/s, the storage is a 3-way ZFS mirror. I
> used hg 4.9.1 (py27), and git 2.21.0. (I know, I need to update both.
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 12:27:42 +0200, Antonio Muci via Mercurial-devel wrote:
> That's sad.
Yeah.
This motivated me enough to clone the repos (hg and git) and collect some
data. Maybe people here will find it useful.
First off, the clone itself. I cloned it from the official upstream repos.
That's sad.
Apparently OpenJDK started contemplating a migration to git one year ago
(2019-07-12): https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/357
I am reporting (an edited version of) the "motivation" section of that
ticket, because I'd like a reflection about how mercurial is perceived
"out there":
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 1:43 PM David Demelier wrote:
>
> # HG changeset patch
> # User David Demelier
> # Date 1595664656 -7200
> # Sat Jul 25 10:10:56 2020 +0200
> # Node ID 7eaad1ed8c743d40fe71620434f3a151f0067105
> # Parent b0e3c6141a7844e1fdd55535677ea3bfb1527707
> who: remove OpenJDK
# HG changeset patch
# User David Demelier
# Date 1595664656 -7200
# Sat Jul 25 10:10:56 2020 +0200
# Node ID 7eaad1ed8c743d40fe71620434f3a151f0067105
# Parent b0e3c6141a7844e1fdd55535677ea3bfb1527707
who: remove OpenJDK
They unfortunately moved to GitHub.
17 matches
Mail list logo
