> > Oh right, that's another thing I wanted to ask -- how would I test that?
> > The only idea I have is to log some verbose message ("tool %s has a
> > graphical interface, launching processes simultaneously") and detect that
> > in test. Is there any better way?
>
> Something like that.
On Sun, 03 Feb 2019 08:52:47 -0800, Ludovic Chabant wrote:
> > Generally looks good. Can you add some tests?
>
> Oh right, that's another thing I wanted to ask -- how would I test that? The
> only idea I have is to log some verbose message ("tool %s has a graphical
> interface, launching
> Generally looks good. Can you add some tests?
Oh right, that's another thing I wanted to ask -- how would I test that? The
only idea I have is to log some verbose message ("tool %s has a graphical
interface, launching processes simultaneously") and detect that in test. Is
there any better
On Sat, 02 Feb 2019 22:24:34 -0800, Ludovic Chabant wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Ludovic Chabant
> # Date 1549173529 28800
> # Sat Feb 02 21:58:49 2019 -0800
> # Node ID b08ea934c2d5ac097b171ca74e826e4f9dea86a9
> # Parent 3a3b053d0882a33ba7ea667052e445b193ffa4df
> extdiff: support
On Sat, 02 Feb 2019 22:43:59 -0800, Ludovic Chabant wrote:
> One thing I'm not quite sure about this change is how to handle the new "gui"
> config flag.
>
> I wanted to use (abuse?) the difference between False and None in order to
> figure out if we found the flag in a section or not (and
One thing I'm not quite sure about this change is how to handle the new "gui"
config flag.
I wanted to use (abuse?) the difference between False and None in order to
figure out if we found the flag in a section or not (and fall back to another
section if not). However, passing None as the
# HG changeset patch
# User Ludovic Chabant
# Date 1549173529 28800
# Sat Feb 02 21:58:49 2019 -0800
# Node ID b08ea934c2d5ac097b171ca74e826e4f9dea86a9
# Parent 3a3b053d0882a33ba7ea667052e445b193ffa4df
extdiff: support tools that can be run simultaneously
diff --git a/hgext/extdiff.py
