On 10/07/2016 05:41 PM, timeless wrote:
Gábor Stefanik wrote:
copies: update _checkcopies to work in a rotated DAG
I'd argue this should be tagged (BC).
I absolutely support this change, it should be changed, it is a bug.
But the reason I'd argue that it's a change is that a repository
cons
Gábor Stefanik wrote:
> copies: update _checkcopies to work in a rotated DAG
I'd argue this should be tagged (BC).
I absolutely support this change, it should be changed, it is a bug.
But the reason I'd argue that it's a change is that a repository
constructed along this path will result in a dif