Re: [PATCH 2 of 7] copies: update _checkcopies to work in a rotated DAG

2016-10-12 Thread Pierre-Yves David
On 10/07/2016 05:41 PM, timeless wrote: Gábor Stefanik wrote: copies: update _checkcopies to work in a rotated DAG I'd argue this should be tagged (BC). I absolutely support this change, it should be changed, it is a bug. But the reason I'd argue that it's a change is that a repository cons

Re: [PATCH 2 of 7] copies: update _checkcopies to work in a rotated DAG

2016-10-07 Thread timeless
Gábor Stefanik wrote: > copies: update _checkcopies to work in a rotated DAG I'd argue this should be tagged (BC). I absolutely support this change, it should be changed, it is a bug. But the reason I'd argue that it's a change is that a repository constructed along this path will result in a dif