Re: [PATCH] py3: remove use of *L syntax

2016-09-02 Thread Yuya Nishihara
On Thu, 01 Sep 2016 04:44:57 +0530, Pulkit Goyal wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User Pulkit Goyal <7895pul...@gmail.com> > # Date 1472677186 -19800 > # Thu Sep 01 02:29:46 2016 +0530 > # Node ID 5ffa4cfc09d7c563b09bc3d4fbd50bccff16aa6a > # Parent 8a84347b9907ada91f9f3a21aca1fb62cac0fed5 >

Re: [PATCH] help: show content for explicitly disabled extension (issue5228)

2016-09-02 Thread Augie Fackler
> On Sep 1, 2016, at 16:08, liscju wrote: > > # HG changeset patch > # User liscju > # Date 1472760402 -7200 > # Thu Sep 01 22:06:42 2016 +0200 > # Node ID fbf842ccbfcf26f3f110638ba6b174891bb0d69f > # Parent

[PATCH 1 of 3] revset: make optimize() reject unknown operators

2016-09-02 Thread Yuya Nishihara
# HG changeset patch # User Yuya Nishihara # Date 1470549702 -32400 # Sun Aug 07 15:01:42 2016 +0900 # Node ID 5cb90003deb87ae58f620657ec891df26e04c72a # Parent d130a38ef41f3c9e2d2f26df3535d89a93f87301 revset: make optimize() reject unknown operators This should have caught

[PATCH 3 of 3] revset: do not partial-match operator and function names in optimize()

2016-09-02 Thread Yuya Nishihara
# HG changeset patch # User Yuya Nishihara # Date 1470555368 -32400 # Sun Aug 07 16:36:08 2016 +0900 # Node ID 1c24a66616699350c48aee283da06906ec9b4efa # Parent 04d0742aa7ecb239a06ba46e9f8ebe0c52a86e9d revset: do not partial-match operator and function names in optimize() It

[PATCH 2 of 3] revset: remove false condition to process 'negate' operator

2016-09-02 Thread Yuya Nishihara
# HG changeset patch # User Yuya Nishihara # Date 1470546807 -32400 # Sun Aug 07 14:13:27 2016 +0900 # Node ID 04d0742aa7ecb239a06ba46e9f8ebe0c52a86e9d # Parent 5cb90003deb87ae58f620657ec891df26e04c72a revset: remove false condition to process 'negate' operator 'negate' is

Re: RFC: bitmap storage for hidden

2016-09-02 Thread Augie Fackler
> On Aug 31, 2016, at 16:53, Durham Goode wrote: > > One of the performance costs that affects every command is the computehidden > function (which computes what commits are hidden based on a combination of > obsmarkers, bookmarks, workingcopy, phases, and tags). At Facebook

Re: RFC: bitmap storage for hidden

2016-09-02 Thread Gregory Szorc
> On Aug 31, 2016, at 13:53, Durham Goode wrote: > > One of the performance costs that affects every command is the computehidden > function (which computes what commits are hidden based on a combination of > obsmarkers, bookmarks, workingcopy, phases, and tags). At Facebook

Re: [PATCH] evolution: make troubles appear in default log (issue4686)

2016-09-02 Thread Kevin Bullock
> On Sep 2, 2016, at 04:38, liscju wrote: > > # HG changeset patch > # User liscju > # Date 1472809041 -7200 > # Fri Sep 02 11:37:21 2016 +0200 > # Node ID 463b164126a0db3f7147787ace34f74deeccc03f > # Parent

Re: [PATCH 1 of 2 RFC V2] largefiles: abort push on client when file fit largefiles (issue3245)

2016-09-02 Thread Yuya Nishihara
On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 09:12:34 +0200, Piotr Listkiewicz wrote: > > I don't have any better idea, but I think it's too late to exchange minsize > > and patterns on push. Ideally these limits should be enforced when files > > are > > added or committed. In order to do that, these values have to be

Re: RFC: bitmap storage for hidden

2016-09-02 Thread Bryan O'Sullivan
I agree that it would make a lot of sense to not use a plain bitmap. The current state of the art for compressed high-performance bitmaps is here: http://roaringbitmap.org/ On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Augie Fackler wrote: > I've considered doing a bitmap index for hidden

Re: RFC: bitmap storage for hidden

2016-09-02 Thread Durham Goode
On 9/2/16 9:14 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote: On Aug 31, 2016, at 13:53, Durham Goode wrote: One of the performance costs that affects every command is the computehidden function (which computes what commits are hidden based on a combination of obsmarkers, bookmarks,

Re: [PATCH 4 of 5] manifest: use property instead of field for manifest revlog storage

2016-09-02 Thread FUJIWARA Katsunori
At Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:35:41 -0700, Durham Goode wrote: > > > On 8/10/16 1:01 AM, FUJIWARA Katsunori wrote: > > At Mon, 8 Aug 2016 18:17:13 -0700, > > Durham Goode wrote: > >> # HG changeset patch > >> # User Durham Goode > >> # Date 1470697899 25200 > >> # Mon Aug 08

[PATCH 3 of 4] streamclone: clear caches after writing changes into files for visibility

2016-09-02 Thread FUJIWARA Katsunori
# HG changeset patch # User FUJIWARA Katsunori # Date 1472840249 -32400 # Sat Sep 03 03:17:29 2016 +0900 # Node ID 33e29b5ebe885cdeeef433861e2d165b882d48d1 # Parent 32f53aaf63f8db0c1352a3b0afb290c425486704 streamclone: clear caches after writing changes into files for

[PATCH 4 of 4] localrepo: make _refreshfilecachestats unfiltered method to refresh correctly

2016-09-02 Thread FUJIWARA Katsunori
# HG changeset patch # User FUJIWARA Katsunori # Date 1472840250 -32400 # Sat Sep 03 03:17:30 2016 +0900 # Node ID b4264bfd8cbc814cab2c87f4752a8b05f84f6f77 # Parent 33e29b5ebe885cdeeef433861e2d165b882d48d1 localrepo: make _refreshfilecachestats unfiltered method to

[PATCH 2 of 4] localrepo: factor out invalidation of @filecache properties to reuse

2016-09-02 Thread FUJIWARA Katsunori
# HG changeset patch # User FUJIWARA Katsunori # Date 1472840248 -32400 # Sat Sep 03 03:17:28 2016 +0900 # Node ID 32f53aaf63f8db0c1352a3b0afb290c425486704 # Parent b9866cdaf302d52a7ddafa60a8a8e5155a764342 localrepo: factor out invalidation of @filecache properties to

[PATCH 1 of 4] streamclone: force @filecache properties to be reloaded from file

2016-09-02 Thread FUJIWARA Katsunori
# HG changeset patch # User FUJIWARA Katsunori # Date 1472840247 -32400 # Sat Sep 03 03:17:27 2016 +0900 # Node ID b9866cdaf302d52a7ddafa60a8a8e5155a764342 # Parent ea486ad5201ccc2cfc254277ba19c81c3131781a streamclone: force @filecache properties to be reloaded from

[PATCH] crecord: properly handle files with No newline at eof (issue5268)

2016-09-02 Thread timeless
# HG changeset patch # User timeless # Date 1472847337 0 # Fri Sep 02 20:15:37 2016 + # Node ID 68a20f02785b24f08b13e21ffc9e2a05031b07f8 # Parent f148bfa40489269be2e48046734f81065129847a # Available At https://bitbucket.org/timeless/mercurial-crew # hg

[PATCH V2] update: warn if cwd was deleted

2016-09-02 Thread Stanislau Hlebik
# HG changeset patch # User Stanislau Hlebik # Date 1472848944 25200 # Fri Sep 02 13:42:24 2016 -0700 # Node ID 374caff3f6ba064070d01329eec1bd33a6a45370 # Parent 318e2b600b80e4ed3c6f37df46ec7544f60d4c0b update: warn if cwd was deleted During update directories are deleted as

Re: change, transform convert branches to bookmarks

2016-09-02 Thread Uwe Brauer
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Uwe Brauer wrote: > One option is to use "hg convert" with the "--branchmap" option to > produce a new repository without any named branches. If you've only > got a small number of branches, it should be fairly easy to create the

[PATCH V2] import: report directory-relative paths in error messages (issue5224)

2016-09-02 Thread liscju
# HG changeset patch # User liscju # Date 1472208500 -7200 # Fri Aug 26 12:48:20 2016 +0200 # Node ID 48eb647e37e99a8c996420e3b99e8b538cf08caa # Parent b1809f5d7630a3fff0fa715bbd30dba0f07672a8 import: report directory-relative paths in error messages (issue5224)